Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Role of Off-line Communication in Human Evolution

  • Published:
Biosemiotics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The existence of embodied communication in humans places them among other living systems and helps to differentiate sign patterns that are common to all bioforms from those that are peculiarly human. Despite the fact that the biological roots of communication have been proven, the understanding of human forms of discourse is still far from being clarified. The main question remains: when and why did humans acquire the ability to exchange messages via speech? My thesis is that it became possible only after humans made a shift from on-line to off-line interaction and learned to communicate in the interpersonal mode via externalized analog codes that constitute the various forms of human culture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577–609.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bickerton, D. (1996). Language and human behavior. Seattle: University of Washington Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvin,W.H. & Bickerton, D. (2000). Lingua ex Machina. MIT. http://williamcalvin.com/LEM/index.htm.

  • Chafe, W. (1994). Discourse, consciousness, and time: The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croft, D., & Thagard, P. (2001). Dynamic imagery: a computational model of motion and visual analogy. http://cogsci.uwaterloo.ca/Articles/Papers/diva.pdf.

  • Donald, M. (1991). Origins of the modern mind: Three stages in evolution of culture and cognition. Cambridge.

  • Frege, G. (1962). Funktion, Begriff, Bedeutung: Fünf logishe Studien. Göttingen.

  • Gatewood, J. (1985). Actions speak louder than words. In J. Dougherty (Ed.), Directions in Cognitive Anthropology pp. 199–220. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glenberg, A. M., & Kaschak, M. P. (2002). Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9(3), 558–565.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Glenberg, A. M., & Robertson, D. A. (2000). Symbol grounding and meaning: a comparison of high-dimensional and embodied theories of meaning. Journal of Memory and Language, 43, 379–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrod, J. (2001). Synopsis of evolution of the human mind. http://www.originsnet.org/old.pdf.

  • Harrod, J. (2002). The cascade of technological evolution. http://www.originsnet.org/old.pdf.

  • Henshilwood, C. S., Marean, C. W. (2006). Remodelling the origins of modern human behaviour. In: H. Soodyall (Ed.), The human genome and Africa: Part one: History and archaeology. Pretoria. http://www.crf.uib/sfu/blombos/pdf.

  • Hoffmeyer, J. (2001). Life and reference. http://www.c3.lang.gov/~rocha/pattee/hoffmeyer–2001.

  • Hoffmeyer, J., & Emmeche, C. (1991) Code-duality and the semiotiotics of nature. http://www.nbi.dk/~emmeche/coPubl/91.JHCE/codedual.

  • Holloway, R. (1996). Evolution of the human brain. In A. Lock, & C. Peters (Eds.), Handbook of human symbolic evolution pp. 74–116. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, T. (2000). The perception of the environment. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansson, S. (2005). Origins of language: constraints on hypotheses. Amsterdam.

  • Keller, J., & Keller, C. (1991). Thinking and acting with iron. Beckman Institute cognitive technical reports Cs-91-08. Champaign (IL): Beckman Institute.

  • Kosslyn, St. (1978). On the ontological status of visual mental images. Theoretical issues in natural languages processing: VII. Arlington (VA), 167–171.

  • Kosslyn, St. (1980). Image and mind. Cambridge (Mass.).

  • Kull, K. (1999). Biosemiotics in the twentieth century: a view from biology. Semiotica, 127(1/4), 385–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laland, K. N., Odling-Smee, J., & Feldman, M. W. (2000). Niche construction, biological evolution, and cultural change. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 131–175.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, Ph. (1998). Eve spoke: human language and human evolution. N.Y.

  • Paducheva E.V. (1984). Refentzial’nye aspekty semantiki predlozheniya [Refential aspects of the sentence semantics]. Izvestiya Akademii nauk SSSR. Seriya literatury i yazyka. T. 42. N.4. 291–303 (in Russian).

  • Pattee, H. H. (1997). The physics of symbols and the evolution of semiotic controls. In M. Coombs, & M. Sulcoski (Eds.), Control mechanisms for complex systems: issues of measurement and semiotic analysis pp. 9–25. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reznikova, Zh. I. (2007). Dialogue with black box: using information theory to study animal language behaviour. Acta Ethologica, 2007.

  • Reznikova, Zh. I., & Ryabko, B. (2001). A study of ant’s numerical competence. Electronic Transactions on Artificial Intelligence Issue, 5(Section B), 111–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzolatti, G., Fadiga, L., Gallese, V., & Fogassi, L. (1996). Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. Cognitive Brain Research, 3(2), 131–141 March.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roepstorff, A. (2001). Thinking with animals. Sign Systems Studies, 29(1), 203–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, D. (2007). H. sapiens as ecologically special: what does language contribute? Language Sciences. doi:10.1016/j.langsci.2006.12.008.

  • Savage-Rumbaugh, E. S., Stuart G. Shanker & Talbot J. Taylor. (2001). Apes, language, and the human mind. Oxford.

  • Schick, K., Toth, N., Garufi, G., Savage-Rumbaugh, E., Savage-Rumbaugh, D., & Sevcik, R. (1999). Continuing investigations into the stone tool-making capabilities of a Bonobo (Pan paniscus). Journal of Archaeological Science, 26, 821–832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sebeok, T. (1972). Perspectives in zoosemiotics. The Hague: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharov, A. A. (2001). Umwelt theory and pragmatism. Semiotica, 134, 211–228 http://www.gypsymoth.ento.vt.edu/~sharov/biosem/txt.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinha, C. (2005). Biology, culture and the emergence and elaboation of symbolization. In A. Saleemi, O. S. Bohn, & A. Gjedde (Eds.), In search of a language for the mind-brain: Can the multiple perspectives be unified? pp. 311–335. Aahus: Aarhus University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinha, C. (2006). Epigenetics, semiotics, and the mysteries of the organism. Biological Theory, 1(2), 112–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stolyar, A. D. (1985). Proiskhozhdeni’e iskusstva [The origin of arts]. Moscow. (in Russian).

  • Toth, N., Schick, K., Savage-Rumbaugh, E., Sevcik, R., & Savage- Rumbaugh, D. (1993). Pan the tool-maker: investigations into the stone tool-making and tool-using capabilities of a bonobo (Pan paniscus). Journal of Archaeological Science, 20, 81–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uexküll, J. von. (1982 [1940]). The theory of meaning. Semiotica, 42(1), 25–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whiten, A., Goodall, J., McGrew, W. C., Nishida, T., Reynolds, V., Sugiyama, Y., Tutin, C. E. G., Wrangham, R. W., & Boesch, C. (1999). Cultures and chimpanzees. Nature, 399, 682–685.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wills, P. R. (2005). Molecular information processing in nature http://www.phy.auckland.ac.nz/alifex/Wills_ALifeX_Workshop.pdf.

  • Witzany, G. (2005). Natural history of life: history of communication logics and dymanics. Journal of Semiotics Evolution, 5(1), 27–55 Energy and development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wynn, T. (2002). Archaeology and cognitive evolution. http://web.uccs.edu/twynn/Archaeology.

  • Wynn, T. (1995). Handaxe enigmas //. World Archaeology, 27(1), 10–27 Symbolic aspects of early technologies. Routledge.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zorina, Z. A. (2005). Animal intelligence: laboratory experiments and observations in nature. Entomological Review, 85(Suppl. 1), S42–S54.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Foreign Languages Department, Herzen State Pedagogical University, 48 Moika Embankment, St. Petersburg, 191186, Russian Federation

    Natalia A. Abieva

Authors
  1. Natalia A. Abieva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Natalia A. Abieva.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Abieva, N.A. The Role of Off-line Communication in Human Evolution. Biosemiotics 1, 295–311 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-008-9024-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-008-9024-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation