Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Seeking Connections, Creating Movement: The Power of Altruistic Action

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Health Care Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Participation of older people in designing and improving the care and services provided in residential care settings is limited. Traditional forms of democratic representation, such as client councils, and consumer models are management-driven. An alternative way of involving older people in the decisions over their lives, grounded in notions of care ethics and deliberative democracy, was explored by action research. In line with this tradition older people engage in collective action to enhance the control over their lives and those of others. In this article the theoretical background of altruistic action is presented and illustrated by a case example of a group of older women who changed the food policies within their residential home. Altruistic action is the joint and coordinated action by a group of clients based on their agenda. Such action is given in by a shared dissatisfaction and search for connections. Altruistic action may enhance the sense of self, belonging and ownership, and create a transformative movement enhancing the wellbeing and community life in residential settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abma, T. A. (2001). Evaluating palliative care. Facilitating reflexive dialogues about an ambiguous concept. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 4(3), 261–276.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Abma, T. A. (2010). Herinneringen en dromen van zeggenschap. Cliëntenparticipatie in de ouderenzorg. [Memories and dreams of agency. Client participation in elderly care. Inaugural lecture.] Den Haag: Boom Lemma Uitgevers.

  3. Abma, T. A. (2005). Patient participation in health research. Research with and for people with spinal cord injuries. Qualitative Health Research, 15(10), 1–19.

  4. Abma, T. A. (2006). Patients as partners in health research. Evaluation and the Health Professions, 29(4), 424–439.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Abma, T. A., & Broerse, J. (2010). Patient participation as dialogue: Setting research agendas. Health Expectations, 13(2), 160–173.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Abma, T. A., Bruijn, A. de, Schols, A., Kardol, T., & Widdershoven G. A. M. (2011). Responsibilities in elderly care. Mr Powell’s narrative of duty and relations. Bioethics, 26(1), 22–31.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Abma, T. A., Nierse, C., & Widdershoven, G. A. M. (2009). Patients as research partners in responsive research. Methodological notions for collaborations in research agenda setting. Qualitative Health Research, 19(3), 401–415.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Abma, T. A., & Widdershoven, G. A. M. (2008). Dialogues in palliative cancer care: The value of responsive evaluation to develop shared understandings. In L. K. Jacobs (Eds.), Coping with cancer (pp. 95–106). New York: Nova Science Publishers.

  9. Abma, T. A., & Widdershoven, G. A. M. (2011). Evaluation as a Relationally Responsive Practice Practice. In N. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Qualitative Research (pp. 669–680). Sage Handbook. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

  10. Adams, R. (1996). Social work and empowerment. Practical social work/BASW. London: MacMillan Press.

  11. Advisory Council on Health Research. (2007). Patient participation in health research. The Hague: Advisory Council on Health Research (RGO), publication no. 56.

  12. Barclay, L. (2000). Autonomy and the social self. In C. Mackenzie & N. Stoljar (Eds.), Relational autonomy. Feminist perspectives on autonomy, agency, and the social self (pp. 52–71). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Barnes, M. (2005). The same old process? Older people, participation and deliberation. Aging and Society, 25, 245–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Barnes, M., & Bennett, G. (1998). Frail bodies, courageous voices: Older people influencing community care. Health and Social Care in the Community, 6(2), 102–111.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Barnes, M. (2012). Care in everyday life. An ethics of care in practice. Brighton: University of Brighton.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Baur, V. (2012). Participation & Partnership. Developing the influence of older people in residential care homes. Dissertation. DenBosch: Tutein Nolthenius bv.

  17. Baur, V. E., & Abma, T. A. (2011). Resident councils between life-world and system: Is there room for communicative action? Journal of Aging Studies, 25, 390–396.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Baur, V. E., & Abma, T. A. (2012). ‘The Taste Buddies’: Participation and empowerment in a residential home for older people. Aging & Society, 32(6), 1055–1078.

  19. Baur, V. E., Abma, T. A., & Widdershoven, G. A. M. (2010). Participation of marginalized people in evaluation: Mission impossible? Evaluation and Program Planning, 33(3), 238–245.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Broerse, J. E. W., & Bunders, J. F. H. (Eds.). (2010). Transitions in health systems. Dealing with persistent problems. Amsterdam: VU University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Brown, W. K. (2004). Resiliency and the mentoring factor. Reclaiming Children and Youth, 13(2), 75–79.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Butler, J., & Scott, J. W. (Eds.). (1992). Feminists theorize the political. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Charlton, J. J. (1998). Nothing about us without us: Disability oppression and empowerment. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. Dewar, B. J. (2005). Beyond tokenistic involvement of older people in research—A framework for future development and understanding. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 14(3a), 48–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Dunston, R., Lee, A., Boud, D., Brodie, P., & Chiarella, M. (2009). Co-production and health system reform. From re-imagining to re-making. The Australian Journal of Public Administration, 68(1), 39–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Garmezy, N. (1991). Resilience and vulnerability to adverse developmental outcomes associated with poverty. American Behavioural Scientist, 34, 416–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Giddens, A. (2001). Modernity and self-identity, self and society in the late modern age. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Gilleard, C., & Higgs, P. (1998). Older people as users and consumers of healthcare: A third age rhetoric for a fourth age reality? Ageing and Society, 18, 233–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Gilroy, R. (2003). Why can’t more people have a say? Learning to work with older people. Ageing and Society, 23, 659–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Greene, J. C. (2006). Evaluation, democracy and social change. In I. F. Shaw, J. C. Greene, & M. M. Mark (Eds.), The sage handbook of evaluation (pp. 118–140). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Greve, B., & Staudinger, U. M. (2006). Resilience in later adulthood and old age. Resources and potentials for successful aging. In D. Cichetti & D. Cohen (Eds.), Developmental psychopathology (Vol. 2, pp. 796–840). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Hardy, S., Concato, J., & Gill, T. M. (2004). Resilience of community dwelling older persons. Journal of American Geriatrics Society, 52, 257–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Health Consumer Powerhouse. (2009). The empowerment of the European patient. Options and implications. Report. Brussel.

  35. Holstein, M. B., Parks, J. A., & Waymack, M. H. (2011). Ethics, aging and society. The critical turn. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Hook, M. L. (2006). Partnering with patients: A concept ready for action. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 56, 133–143.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Hyung Hur, M. (2006). Empowerment in terms of theoretical perspectives: Exploring a typology of the process and components across disciplines. Journal of Community Psychology, 34(5), 523–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. In ‘t Veld, R. (2010). Knowledge democracy. Consequences for science, politics and media. Heidelberg, Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  39. INVOLVE. (2009). Promoting public involvement in the NHS, public health and social care research. Summary: Exploring impact. NHS National Institute for Health Research.

  40. Isin, E., & Wood, P. (1999). Citizenship and identity. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Isreal, B. A., Checkoway, B., Schulz, A., & Zimmerman, M. (1994). Health education and community empowerment: Conceptualizing and measuring perceptions of individual, organizational and community control. Health Education Quarterly, 21(2), 149–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Janssen, B. T., Van Regenmortel, T., & Abma, T. A. (2011). Identifying sources of strength: Processes of resilience among older people living in the community who receive care. European Journal of Aging. doi:10.1007/510433-011-0190-8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Karpowitz, C. F., Raphael, C., & Hammond, A. S. (2009). Deliberative democracy and inequality: Two cheers for enclave deliberation among the disempowered. Politics & Society, 37(4), 576–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Lather, P. (1991). Getting smart: Feminist research and pedagogy within the postmodern. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Luthar, S. S. (2006). Resilience in development. A synthesis of research across five decades. In D. Chichette & D. Cohen (Eds.), Developmental psychopathology (2nd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 739–795). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Lyotard, L. F. (1984). The postmodern condition. A report on knowledge. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Mackenzie, C., & Stoljar, N. (Eds.). (2000). Relational autonomy. Feminist perspectives on autonomy, agency and the social self. New York: Oxford University.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Masten, A. (2001). Ordinary magic: Resilience processes in development. American Psychologist, 56(3), 227–238.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Masten, A. S., & Wright, M. O. (2009). Resilience over the lifespan: Development perspectives on resistance, recovery, and transformation. In J. W. Reich (Ed.), Handbook of adult resilience (pp. 213–237). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  50. McKie, L. (2003). Rhetorical spaces: Participation and pragmatism in the evaluation of community health work. Evaluation, 9(3), 307–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Mc Lean, A. (1995). Empowerment and the psychiatric consumer/ex-patient movement in the US: Contradictions, crisis and change. Social Science and Medicine, 40(8), 1053–1071.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Mehrotra, C. M., & Wagner, L. S. (2009). Aging and diversity. An active learning experience (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Melucci, A. (1996). Challenging codes. Collective action in the information age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  54. Mertens, D. (2009). Transformative research and evaluation. New York, London: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Nelson, G., Lord, J., & Ochocha, J. (2001). Empowerment and mental health in the community: Narratives of psychiatric consumer/survivors. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 11, 125–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Nierse, C., & Abma, T. A. (2011). Developing voice and empowerment: The first step towards a broad consultation in research agenda setting. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 55(4), 411–421.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Nierse, C., Schipper, K., Zadelhoff, E. van, Griendt, J. van de, & Abma, T. A. (2011). Collaboration and co-ownership in research. Dynamics and dialogues between patient research partners and professional researchers in a research team. Health Expectations. doi:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00661.x. URL: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/abstract.

  58. Nilsen, E. S., Myrhaug, H. T., Johansen, M., Oliver, S., & Oxman, A. D. (2006). Methods of consumer involvement in developing healthcare policy and research, clinical practice guidelines and patient information material. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (3), CD004563. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD004563.pub2.

  59. Oliver, M. (1992). Changing the social relations of research production? Disability, Handicap & Society, 7(2), 101–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Peterson, N. A., & Zimmerman, M. A. (2004). Beyond the individual: Toward a nomological network of organizational empowerment. American Journal of Community Psychology, 13(5), 569–579.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Powers, P. (2003). Empowerment as treatment and the role of health professionals. Advances in Nursing Science, 26(3), 227–237.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Rapp, C. A., & Goscha, R. J. (2006). The strengths model. Case management with people with psychiatric disabilities. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Rappaport, J. (1995). Empowerment meets narrative: Listening to stories and creating settings. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23(5), 795–808.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Rappaport, J. (1981). In praise of paradox: A social policy of empowerment over prevention. American Journal of Community Psychology, 9(1), 1–25.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Rappaport, J. (1987). Terms of empowerment/exemplars of prevention: Toward a theory of community psychology. American Journal of Community Psychology, 15(2), 121–148.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Ryfe, D. M. (2006). Narrative and deliberation in small group forums. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 34(1), 72–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Schipper, K., Abma, T. A., Van Zadelhoff, E., Van de Griendt, E., Nierse, C., & Widdershoven, G. A. M. (2010). What does it mean to be a patient research partner? An ethnodrama. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(6), 501–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Simon, B. (2004). Identity in modern society: A social psychological perspective. Malden, MA, USA: Blackwell.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  69. Sprague, J., & Hayes, J. (2000). Self-determination and empowerment: A feminist standpoint analysis of talk about disability. American Journal of Community Psychology, 28(5), 671–695.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Tengland, P. A. (2008). Empowerment: A conceptual discussion. Health Care Analysis, 16, 77–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Trappenburg, M. (2008). Genoeg is genoeg. Over gezondheidszorg en democratie [Enough is enough. About healthcare and democracy]. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

  72. Tronto, J. (1993). Moral boundaries. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Van de Bovenkamp, H. M. (2010). The limits of patient power. Rotterdam: EUR.

  74. Van der Plaat, M. (1999). Locating the feminist scholar: Relational empowerment and social activism. Qualitative Health Research, 9(6), 773–785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Van der Voet, G. W. (2004). De kwaliteit van de WMCZ als medezeggenschapswet [The quality of the WMCZ as co-determination law]. Rotterdam: Erasmus University Repub.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Van Gunsteren, H. (1992) Eigentijds burgerschap [Contemporary citizenship]. WRR rapport. Den Haag: Sdu uitgeverij.

  77. Van Osselen, J. (2003). Ethical aspects of palliative care. Maastricht: Maastricht University.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Verkerk, M. (2001). The care perspective and autonomy. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 4, 289–294.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. Visse, M. A., Abma, T. A., & Widdershoven, G. A. M. (2012). Relational responsibilities in responsive evaluation. Evaluation & Program Planning, 35(1), 97–104.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Walker, M. U. (1998). Moral understandings. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Walmsley, J., & Johnson, K. (2003). Inclusive research with people with learning disabilities. Past, present and futures. London: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Williams, V. (1999). Researching together. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27(2), 48–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Williamson, C. (2010). Toward the emancipation of patients. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Zimmerman, M. A. (2000). Empowerment theory: Psychological, organisational, and community level of analysis. In J. Rappaport & E. Seidman (Eds.), Handbook of community psychology (pp. 43–63). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Medical Humanities, Emgo+ Research Institute for Health and Primary Care Research, VU University Medical Center, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Tineke A. Abma & Vivianne Baur

Authors
  1. Tineke A. Abma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Vivianne Baur
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tineke A. Abma.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Abma, T.A., Baur, V. Seeking Connections, Creating Movement: The Power of Altruistic Action. Health Care Anal 22, 366–384 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-012-0222-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-012-0222-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation