Abstract
The meaning of the word ‘homology’ has changed. From being a comparative concept in pre-Darwinian times, it became a historical concept, strictly signifying a common evolutionary origin for either anatomical structures or genes. This historical understanding of homology is not useful in classification; therefore I propose a return to its pre-Darwinian meaning.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aboitiz, F. (1987). ‘Homology’ in anatomy and molecular biology.- Cell 51: 515–516.
Darwin, C. (1872). The Origin of Species.- 6th Ed. New York: Collier Eds. 1962.
Goodwin, B.C. (1982). Development and evolution.- J. Theor. Biol. 97: 43–55.
Gould, S.J. (1987). Time's Arrow, Time's Cycle. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Gould, S.J. (1988). Conference on molecular data and systematics.- Symposium on “The Impact of Molecular Analyses on Our Understanding of Evolution”.- Univ. of South California, March 11.
Reeck, G.R., de Haen, C., Teller, D.C., Doolitle, R.F., Fitch, W.M., Dickerson, R.E., Chambon, P., McLachlan, A.D., Margoliash, E., Jukes, T.H. and Zuckerland, E. (1987). A terminology muddy and a way out of it.- Cell 50: 667.
Russell, E.S. (1916). Form and Function.- Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1982.
Thom, R. (1972). Structural Stability and Morphogenesis. Mass.: W.A. Benjamin.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Aboitiz, F. Homology: A comparative or a historical concept?. Acta Biotheor 37, 27–29 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00050805
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00050805