Skip to main content
Log in

Understanding Factors Affecting Salespeople’s Perceptions of Ethical Behavior in South Africa

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sales professionals have been frequent targets of ethical criticism. This paper reports on a survey on ethics of sales professionals in South Africa. The results revealed salespeople’s views on controversial sales practices that involve direct monetary consequences; on practices that adversely affect customers, employers and competitors; and on sales peoples sensitization of ethical issues. Stealing from a competitor at a trade show was viewed as the most unethical of the scenarios, while phone sabotage and lying to a customer were held to be the next most unethical scenarios. Analysis of the results lead to a discussion of the implications for sales management. Ethical perceptions were affected by financial considerations. Marketing and Sales Managers will have to review their approach to training in sales ethics as well as how sales professionals implement the market driven approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aldridge, H. and D. Herker: 1997, ‘Boundary Spanning Roles and Organization Structure’, Academy of Management Review 2, 217-230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellizzi, J. A.: 1995, ‘Committing and Supervising Unethical Sales Force Behaviour: The Effects of Victim Gender, Victim Status, and Sales Force Motivation Techniques’, Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management 15, 1-15

    Google Scholar 

  • Bush, V., S. Harris and A. Bush: 1997, ‘Establishing Ethical Boundaries for Service Providers: A Narrative Approach’, Journal of Service Marketing 11, 265-280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callan, V. J.: 1992, ‘Predicting Ethical Values and Training Needs in Ethics’, Journal of Business Ethics 11, 761-769.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chonko, L. B. and J. J. Burnett: 1983, ‘Measuring the Importance of Ethical Situations as a Source of Role Conflict: A Survey of Sales People, Sales Managers and Support Personnel’, Journal of Personnel Selling and Sales Management 3, 41-47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chonko, L. B. and S. D. Hunt: 1985, ‘Ethics and Marketing Management: An Empirical Investigation’, Journal of Business Research 13, 339-359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dabholkar, P. A. and J. J. Kellaris: 1992, ‘Towards Understanding Marketing Students’ Ethical Judgement of Controversial Personal Selling Practices’, Journal of Business Research 24, 313-329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrell, O. C. and S. J. Skinner: 1988, ‘Ethical Behavior and Bureaucratic Structure in Marketing Research Organizations’, Journal of Marketing Research 25, 103-109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G.: 1997, Cultures and Organizations; Software of the Mind (McGraw-Hill, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellaris, J. J. and P. A. Dabholkar: 1989, ‘The PSE Scale: A Scenario Based Approach to Assessing the Ethical Sensitivity of Sales Students and Professionals’, in D. J. Good (ed.), Proceedings of the Pi Sigma Epsilon National Conference in Sales Management (Pi Sigma Epsilon, New Orleans, LA), pp. 32-37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, M. and A. J. Dubinsky: 1983, ‘Identifying and Addressing Retail Salespeople’s Ethical Problems: A Method and Application’, Journal of Retailing 59, 46-66.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClaren, N.: 2000, ‘Ethics in Personal Selling and Sales Management: A Review of the Literature Focusing on Empirical Findings and Conceptual Foundations’, Journal of Business Ethics 27, 285-303.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNichols, C. W. and T. W. Zimmerer: 1985, ‘Situational Ethics: An Empirical Study of Differentiators of Student Attitudes’, Journal of Business Ethics 4, 175-180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, P. E. and G. R. Laczniak: 1981, ‘Marketing Ethics: A Review with Implications For Managers, Educators and Researchers’, in B. E. Enis and K. J. Roering (eds.), Review of Marketing (American Marketing Association, Chicago, IL).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nantel, J. and W. A. Weeks: 1996, ‘Marketing Ethics: Is there More to it Than the Utilitarian Approach?’, European Journal of Marketing 30, 543-555.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serwineck, P. J.: 1992, ‘Demographic and Related Differences in Ethical Views among Small Businesses’, Journal of Business Ethics 11, 555-566.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, T. H. and C. D. Bodkin: 1988, ‘A Cross National Comparison of University Students’ Perceptions Regarding the Ethics and Acceptability of Sales Practices’, Journal of Business Ethics 17, 45-55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trompenaars, F.: 1993, Riding the Waves of Culture: Understanding Cultural Diversity in Business (Nicholas Brealey Publishing Ltd., London)

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitell, S. J., K. Rallapalli and A. Singhapakdi: 1993, ‘Marketing Norms: The Influences of Personal Moral Philosophies and Organizational Ethical Culture’, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 21, 331-337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weeks, W. A. and J. Nantel: 1992, ‘Corporate Codes of Ethics and Sales Force Behavior: A Case Study’, Journal of Business Ethics 11, 753-760.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zikmund, W.: 1984, Business Research Methods, 5th Edition (The Dryden Press, Orlando).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Abratt, R., Penman, N. Understanding Factors Affecting Salespeople’s Perceptions of Ethical Behavior in South Africa. Journal of Business Ethics 35, 269–280 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013872805967

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013872805967

Navigation