Skip to main content

Past Designs as Repositories of Tacit Collective Knowledge

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Rethinking Technology and Engineering

Part of the book series: Philosophy of Engineering and Technology ((POET,volume 45))

  • 214 Accesses

Abstract

As most engineering design proceeds by modifying past designs and reusing and adapting existing components and solution principles, a significant part of the knowledge engineers employ in design is encapsulated in the past designs they are familiar with. References to past designs, as well as encounters with them, serve to invoke the knowledge associated with them and constructed from them. This chapter argues that much of this knowledge is tacit consisting in and/or made available by the perceptual recognition of features and situations, using a discussion of design margins to illustrate how engineers use tacit knowledge in reasoning about the properties of new designs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Addis, M. (2013). Linguistic competence and expertise, special issue “Tacit knowledge: New theories and practices”. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 12(2), 327–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Addis, M. (2016). Tacit and explicit knowledge in construction management, special issue “Theorising expertise in construction”. Construction Management and Economics, 34(7/8), 439–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archer, L. B. (1981). A view of the nature of design research. In R. Jacques & J. A. Powell (Eds.), Design, science, method (pp. 30–35). Butterworths.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blessing, L. T. M., & Chakrabarti, A. (2009). DRM, a design research methodology. Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • De Weck, O. L., Roos, D., & Magee, C. L. (2011). Engineering systems: Meeting human needs in a complex technological world. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckert, C. M., & Clarkson, P. J. (2010). Planning development processes for complex products. Research in Engineering Design 21(3), 153–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckert, C., & Hillerbrand, R. (2018). Models in engineering design: Generative and epistemic function of product models. In P. Vermaas & S. Vial (Eds.), Advancements in the philosophy of design (pp. 219–242). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckert, C. M., Stacey, M. K., & Clarkson, P. J. (2003). The spiral of applied research: A methodological view on integrated design research. In Proceedings of the 14th international conference on engineering design (ICED’03). Design Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckert, C. M., Clarkson, P. J., & Zanker, W. (2004). Change and customisation in complex engineering domains. Research in Engineering Design, 15(1), 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckert, C. M., Stacey, M. K., & Earl, C. F. (2005). References to past designs. Studying Designers, 05, 3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckert, C. M., Stacey, M., Wyatt, D., & Garthwaite, P. (2012a). Change as little as possible: Creativity in design by modification. Journal of Engineering Design, 23(4), 337–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckert, C. M., Isaksson, O., & Earl, C. F. (2012b). Product property margins: An underlying critical problem of engineering design. In Proceedings of TMCE 2012, Karlsruhe, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckert, C. M., Isaksson, O., & Earl, C. F. (2019). Design margins: A hidden issue in industry. Design Science, 5, e9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckert, C. M., Isaksson, O., Lebjioui, S., Earl, C. F., & Edlund, S. (2020). Design margins in industrial practice. Design Science, 6, e30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eger, T., Eckert, C. M., & Clarkson, P. J. (2005). The role of design freeze in product development. In Proceedings of the 15th international conference on engineering design (ICED’05). Design Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gobet, F. (2019). Three views on expertise: Philosophical implications for rationality, knowledge, intuition and education. In M. Addis & C. Winch (Eds.), Education and expertise (pp. 58–74). Wiley Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horvath, I. (2004). A treatise on order in engineering design research. Research in Engineering Design, 15(3), 155–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houkes, W. (2006). Knowledge of artefact functions. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 37(1), 102–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houkes, W. (2009). Philosophy of technology and engineering sciences. In A. W. M. Meijers (Ed.), Handbook of the philosophy of science (Vol. 9, pp. 309–350). Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isaksson, O., Lindroth, P., & Eckert, C. M. (2014). Optimisation of products versus optimisation of product platforms: An engineering change margin perspective. In DS 77: Proceedings of the DESIGN 2014 13th international design conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, E. (2017). Evidence in engineering. In D. Michelfelder, B. Newberry, & Q. Zhu (Eds.), Philosophy and engineering. Philosophy of engineering and technology (Vol. 26). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koriat, A., Goldsmith, M., & Pansky, A. (2000). Towards a psychology of memory accuracy. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 481–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Löwenstein, D. (2017). Know-how as competence. Klostermann.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pirtle, Z. (2009). How the models of engineering tell the truth. In I. Van de Poel & D. E. Goldberg (Eds.), Philosophy and engineering (pp. 95–108). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Poser, H. (2013). The ignorance of engineers and how they know it. In D. P. Michelfelder, N. McCarthy, & D. E. Goldberg (Eds.), Philosophy and engineering: Reflections on practice, principles and process (pp. 3–14). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Purcell, T., & Gero, J. S. (1998). Drawings and the design process. Design Studies, 19, 389–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryle, G. (1946). Knowing how and knowing that. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 56, 212–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryle, G. (1949). The concept of mind. Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, M. K., & Eckert, C. M. (2022). Objects as carriers of engineering knowledge. Engineering Studies, 14(2), 87–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tahera, K., Wynn, D. C., Earl, C. F., & Eckert, C. M. (2019). Testing in the incremental design and development of complex products. Research in Engineering Design, 30(2), 291–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vincenti, W.G. (1990). What engineers know and how they know it: analytical studies from aeronautical history. The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, M. T. (2018). Intuition and ineffability: Tacit knowledge and engineering design. In A. Fritzsche & S. J. Oks (Eds.), The future of engineering (pp. 53–67). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark Addis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Addis, M., Eckert, C., Stacey, M. (2023). Past Designs as Repositories of Tacit Collective Knowledge. In: Fritzsche, A., Santa-María, A. (eds) Rethinking Technology and Engineering. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology, vol 45. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25233-4_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics