Abstract
A syllabic acrostic (de-ca-te, “tenth”) has recently been discovered by Leah Kronenberg at Eclogue 4.9–11. The aim of the present article is to adduce further evidence for the intentionality of this acrostic. The article begins by pointing to corroborative clues in the text encompassed by the acrostic itself. Attention is then drawn to the overlooked deni‑acrostic in the previous Eclogue (3.55–58). This acrostical deni, for whose intentionality arguments are likewise adduced, evidently serves to corroborate acrostical decate. This deni‑acrostic is itself confirmed shortly afterwards by decem (Ecl. 3.71), which is in turn an imitation of Theocritus (Id. 3.10). This Theocritean text, which contains the word δέκα in ‘line ten’, provides further corroboration of the decate-acrostic, which is likewise centred around ‘line ten’. In particular it is argued that this passage of Theocritus has inspired the noun which decate can be shown to qualify.
Bibliography
Bucolici Graeci, ed. A. S. F. Gow, Oxford 1958.Search in Google Scholar
P. Vergilius Maro, Bucolica, ed. S. Ottaviano; Georgica, ed. G. B. Conte, Berlin/Boston 2013.Search in Google Scholar
N. Adkin, “How Long Was Christ in the Womb? A Division of Opinion in the Fathers”, EThL 70, 1994, 394–397.10.2143/ETL.70.4.556069Search in Google Scholar
N. Adkin, “Laocoon’s Shot: A Note on Aen. 2.50–53”, Maia 64, 2012, 424–428.Search in Google Scholar
N. Adkin, “‘Read the Edge’: Acrostics in Virgil’s Sinon Episode”, ACD 50, 2014, 45–72.Search in Google Scholar
N. Adkin, “On a New Virgil Acrostic: Aeneid 6.77–84”, Mnemosyne 68, 2015 a, 1018–1019.10.1163/1568525X-12341886Search in Google Scholar
N. Adkin, “Quis est nam ludus in undis? (Virgil, Ecl. 9.39–43)”, ACD 51, 2015 b, 43–58.Search in Google Scholar
N. Adkin, “A Political Acrostic in Virgil (Ecl. 6.14–24)”, BStudLat 45, 2015 c, 433–455.Search in Google Scholar
N. Adkin, “Acrostic Shit (Ecl. 4.47–52)”, ACD 52, 2016, 21–37.10.22315/ACD/2016/2Search in Google Scholar
N. Adkin, “Valerius Flaccus’ Laniabor-Acrostic (Argon. 4.177–184)”, CQ 67, 2017 a, 327–328.10.1017/S0009838817000027Search in Google Scholar
N. Adkin, “Who is the Dedicatee of Virgil’s Eighth Eclogue?: A New Acrostic”, Latomus 76, 2017 b, 1065–1067.Search in Google Scholar
N. Adkin, “MA VE PU Again: Kill Caesar! (Georg. 1.424–471)”, ACD 54, 2018, 73–90.10.22315/ACD/2018/4Search in Google Scholar
N. Adkin, “Virgilian Acrostics: A Typology”, BStudLat 51, 2021, 128–136. Search in Google Scholar
N. Adkin, “On a Newly Discovered Acrostic in Virgil (Aen. 10.693–697): Mezentius and Jupiter”, EClás 161, 2022 a, 53–64. Search in Google Scholar
N. Adkin, “Acrostic Conversation: Horace, Ode 1.18”, ACD 58, 2022 b, 67–100.10.22315/ACD/2022/5Search in Google Scholar
E. Benoist, Oeuvres de Virgile: Bucoliques et Géorgiques, Paris 31884. Search in Google Scholar
W. Clausen, A Commentary on Virgil, Eclogues, Oxford 1994.Search in Google Scholar
R. Coleman, Vergil: Eclogues, Cambridge 1977.Search in Google Scholar
J. Conington/H. Nettleship/F. Haverfield, Conington’s Virgil: Eclogues, Exeter 2007.Search in Google Scholar
J. Danielewicz, “ASTER, ASTER, ASTER: A Triple Transliterated Greek Acrostic in Vergil’s Eclogue 4”, Philologus 163, 2019, 361–366.10.1515/phil-2018-0036Search in Google Scholar
J. L. de la Cerda, P. Virgilii Maronis Bucolica et Georgica, Lyon 1619.Search in Google Scholar
G. Firpo, “Ancora sui Decem Menses di Verg. Ecl. 4.61”, Aevum 79, 2005, 41–48.Search in Google Scholar
H. Holtorf, P. Vergilius Maro: Die grösseren Gedichte, I, Freiburg/München 1959.Search in Google Scholar
N. Hopkinson, Theocritus, Moschus, Bion, Cambridge, MA/London 2015. Search in Google Scholar
J. T. Katz, “The Muse at Play: An Introduction”, in: J. Kwapisz/D. Petrain/M. Szymański (eds.), The Muse at Play: Riddles and Wordplay in Greek and Latin Poetry, Berlin/Boston 2013, 3–30. 10.1515/9783110270617.1Search in Google Scholar
S. Koster, Ille ego qui. Dichter zwischen Wort und Macht, Erlangen 1988. Search in Google Scholar
L. Kronenberg, “The Tenth Age of Apollo and a New Acrostic in Eclogue 4”, Philologus 161, 2017, 337–339.10.1515/phil-2016-0120Search in Google Scholar
T. Ladewig/C. Schaper/P. Deuticke/P. Jahn, Vergils Gedichte, I, Berlin 101973.Search in Google Scholar
P. Levi, “The Dedication to Pollio in Virgil’s Eighth Eclogue”, Hermes 94, 1966, 73–79.Search in Google Scholar
R. Maltby, A Lexicon of Ancient Latin Etymologies, Leeds 1991.Search in Google Scholar
J. J. O’Hara, True Names: Vergil and the Alexandrian Tradition of Etymological Wordplay, Ann Arbor 22017.Search in Google Scholar
T. L. Papillon/A. E. Haigh, P. Vergili Maronis opera, II, Oxford 1892.Search in Google Scholar
G. C. Paraskeviotis, Vergil’s Eclogues: A Study of the Greek and Roman Literary Sources, Cambridge 2020.Search in Google Scholar
J. Perret, Virgile: Les Bucoliques, Paris 21970.Search in Google Scholar
F. Plessis/P. Lejay, Oeuvres de Virgile, Paris 1919.Search in Google Scholar
M. Robinson, “Looking Edgeways: Pursuing Acrostics in Ovid and Virgil”, CQ 69, 2019 a, 290–308. 10.1017/S0009838819000375Search in Google Scholar
M. Robinson, “Arms and a Mouse: Approaching Acrostics in Ovid and Virgil”, MD 82, 2019 b, 23–73.Search in Google Scholar
A. Sidgwick, P. Vergili Maronis opera, II, Cambridge 1890.Search in Google Scholar
A. Walde/J. B. Hofmann, Lateinisches etymologisches Wörterbuch, I, Heidelberg 62008. Search in Google Scholar
R. D. Williams, Virgil: The Eclogues and Georgics, London 1979.Search in Google Scholar
© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
