This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
REFERENCES
Adler, J.: 1997a, 'Fallacies Not Fallacious: Not!', Philosophy and Rhetoric 30, 333–350.
Adler, J.: 1997b, 'Reply by Repetition and Reminder', Philosophy and Rhetoric 30, 367–375.
Bowles, G.: 1990, 'Propositional Relevance', Informal Logic XII, 65–77.
Bowles, G.: 1996, 'Affirming the Consequent', Argumentation 10, 429–444.
Carroll, L.: 1895, 'What the Tortoise Said to Achilles', Mind 4, 278–280.
Copi, I. M. and C. Cohen: 1994, Introduction to Logic, Ninth Edition, MacMillan, New York.
Duhem, P.: 1954, The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Giere, R.: 1979, Understanding Scientific Reasoning, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.
Grice, P.: 1989, Studies in the Way of Words, essay 2, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
Manicas, P. T. and A. N. Kruger: 1976, Logic: The Essentials, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Massey, G.: 1981, 'The Fallacy Behind Fallacies', Midwest Studies in Philosophy 6, 489–500.
Quine, W. v. O.: 1980, 'Two Dogmas of Empiricism', From a Logical Point of View, Second Revised Edition, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp. 20–46.
Wellman, C.: 1971, Challenge and Response, Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale.
Woods, J.: 1994, 'Sunny Prospects for Relevance?', in R. H. Johnson and J. A. Blair (eds.), New Essays in Informal Logic, University of Windsor, Windsor, pp. 82–92.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Adler, J.E. Affirming a Straw Man: A Reply to Bowles. Argumentation 13, 17–26 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007737330129
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007737330129