Abstract
Although norms of premarital sex vary cross-culturally, the sexuality of adolescent girls has been consistently more restricted than that of adolescent boys. Three major theories that attempt to explain restrictions on female premarital sex (FPS) concern male, female, and parental control. These competing theories have not been tested against each other cross-culturally. In this study, we do this using a sample of 128 nonindustrial societies and socioecological predictors capturing extramarital sex, paternal care, female status, sex ratio, parental control over a daughter’s mate choice, residence, and marriage transactions, while also controlling for phylogenetic non-independence across societies. We found that multiple parties benefit from restrictions on FPS. Specifically, FPS is more restricted in societies intolerant of extramarital sex and where men transfer property to their children (male control), as well as where marriages are arranged by parents (parental control). Both paternity uncertainty (partitioned among marital fidelity and paternal investment) and parent–offspring conflict (prompting parents to control their daughter’s sexuality) were identified as possible mechanisms of FPS restrictions. The evidence for female control is ambiguous, mainly because it can be equally well interpreted as both male control and parental control, and because fathers, rather than mothers, are often the primary decision makers about a daughter’s mate choice. Our results also emphasize the importance of social roles, rather than stereotyped sex roles, as a more useful approach to understanding the evolution of FPS restrictions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Code and Data Availability
References
Apostolou, M. (2007). Sexual selection under parental choice: The role of parents in the evolution of human mating. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28(6), 403–409. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203741658
Apostolou, M. (2010). Sexual selection under parental choice in agropastoral societies. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31(1), 39–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2009.06.010
Apostolou, M. (2013a). Sexual selection under parental choice: The evolution of human mating behavior. In Sexual selection under parental choice: The evolution of human mating behavior. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203741658
Apostolou, M. (2013b). Do as we wish: Parental tactics of mate choice manipulation. Evolutionary Psychology, 11(4), 795–813. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470491301100404
Barry, H., & Schlegel, A. (1982). Cross-cultural codes on contributions by women to subsistence. Ethnology, 21(2), 165. https://doi.org/10.2307/3773435
Baumeister, R. F., & Twenge, J. M. (2002). Cultural suppression of female sexuality. Review of General Psychology, 6(2), 166–203. American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.6.2.166
Baumeister, R. F., & Vohs, K. D. (2004). Sexual economics: Sex as female resource for social exchange in heterosexual interactions. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(4), 339–363. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_2
Betzig, L. (1992). Roman monogamy. Ethology and Sociobiology, 13(5–6), 351–383.
Blake, K., Fourati, M., & Brooks, R. C. (2018). Who suppresses female sexuality? An examination of support for Islamic veiling in a secular Muslim democracy as a function of sex and offspring sex. Evolution and Human Behavior, 39(6), 632–638.
Borgerhoff Mulder, M. (1988). Kipsigis bridewealth payments. In L. L. Betzig, M. Borgerhoff Mulder, & P. W. Turke (Eds.), Human reproductive behaviour: A Darwinian perspective. (pp. 65–82). Cambridge University Press.
Broude, G. J. (1975). Norms of premarital sexual behavior: A cross-cultural study. Ethos, 3(3), 381–402. https://doi.org/10.1525/eth.1975.3.3.02a00020
Broude, G. J. (1983). Male-female relationships in cross-cultural perspective: A study of sex and intimacy. Cross-Cultural Research, 18(2), 154–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/106939718301800204
Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00023992
Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100(2), 204–232. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.100.2.204
Buunk, A. P., Park, J. H., & Dubbs, S. L. (2008). Parent-offspring conflict in mate preferences. Review of General Psychology, 12(1), 47–62. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.12.1.47
Carpenter, B., Gelman, A., Hoffman MD, Lee, D., Goodrich B, Betancourt, M., Brubaker, M., Guo, J., Li, P., & Riddell, A. (2017). Stan: A probabilistic programming language. Journal of Statistical Software, 76(1), 1–32. https://www.jstatsoft.org/index.php/jss/article/view/v076i01
Chagnon, N., Lynch, R., Shenk, M., Hames, R., & Flinn, M. (2017). Cross-cousin marriage among the Yanomamö shows evidence of parent–offspring conflict and mate competition between brothers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(13), E2590–E2607. https://www.pnas.org/content/114/13/E2590.short
Daly, M., Wilson, M., & Weghorst, S. (1982). Male sexual jealousy. Ethology and Sociobiology, 31(1), 11–27.
Deffner, D., Rohrer, J., & McElreath, R. (2021). A causal framework for cross-cultural generalizability. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/fqukp
Dow, M. M., & Eff, E. A. (2009). Multiple imputation of missing data in cross-cultural samples. Cross-Cultural Research, 43(3), 206–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069397109333362
Duda, P., & Zrzavý, J. (2016). Human population history revealed by a supertree approach. Scientific Reports, 6. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep29890
Ericksen, K. P. (1989). Female genital mutilations in Africa. Cross-Cultural Research, 23(1–4), 182–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/106939718902300104
Fortunato, L. (2012). The evolution of matrilineal kinship organization. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 279(1749), 4939–4945. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2012.1926
Fortunato, L., & Archetti, M. (2010). Evolution of monogamous marriage by maximization of inclusive fitness. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 23(1), 149–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01884.x
Francis, A. M. (2011). Sex ratios and the red dragon: Using the Chinese Communist Revolution to explore the effect of the sex ratio on women and children in Taiwan. Journal of Population Economics, 24(3), 813–837. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00148-009-0262-7
Gaulin, S. J. C., & Boster, J. S. (1990). Dowry as female competition. American Anthropologist, 92(4), 994–1005. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1990.92.4.02a00080
Gaulin, S. J. C., & Schlegel, A. (1980). Paternal confidence and paternal investment: A cross cultural test of a sociobiological hypothesis. Ethology and Sociobiology, 1(4), 301–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(80)90015-1
Gelman, A. (2008). Scaling regression inputs by dividing by two standard deviations. Statistics in Medicine, 27(15), 2865–2873. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.3107
Gelman, A., & Hill, J. (2006). Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. Cambridge University Press.
Goethals, G. (1971). Factors affecting permissive and nonpermissive rules regarding premarital sex. In J. M. Henslin (Ed.), Sociology of sex: A book of readings (pp. 9–25). Appelton-Century-Crofts.
Goetz, A. T., & Shackelford, T. K. (2009). Sexual conflict in humans: Evolutionary consequences of asymmetric parental investment and paternity uncertainty. Animal Biology, 59(4), 449–456. https://doi.org/10.1163/157075509X12499949744342
Gray, P. B., & Crittenden, A. N. (2014). Father Darwin: Effects of children on men, viewed from an evolutionary perspective. Fathering, 12(2), 121–142. https://doi.org/10.3149/fth.1202.121
Guttentag, M., & Secord, P. (1983). Too many women? SAGE Publications.
Hartung, J. (1981). Paternity and inheritance of wealth. Nature, 291(5817), 652–654. https://doi.org/10.1038/291652a0
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). Most people are not WEIRD. Nature, 466, 29. https://doi.org/10.1038/466029a
Hewlett, B., & Macfarlan, S. (2010). Fathers’ roles in hunter-gatherer and other small-scale cultures. In M. E. Lamb (Ed.), The role of the father in child development (pp. 413–434). John Wiley & Sons.
Howard, J. A., & Gibson, M. A. (2019). Is there a link between paternity concern and female genital cutting in West Africa? Evolution and Human Behavior, 40(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2018.06.011
Jones, N. S., & Moriarty, J. (2013). Evolutionary inference for function-valued traits: Gaussian process regression on phylogenies. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 10(78). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2012.0616
Kellie, D. J., Dixson, B. J. W., & Brooks, R. C. (2020). Papa don’t preach? Using lies to expose the truth about who suppresses female sexuality. Human Nature, 31(3), 222–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-020-09372-7
Korotayev, A. V., & Kazankov, A. A. (2003). Factors of sexual freedom among foragers in cross-cultural perspective. Cross-Cultural Research, 37, 29–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069397102238920
Low, B. (2005). Women’s lives there, here, then, now: A review of women’s ecological and demographic constraints cross-culturally. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26(1), 64–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069397108317669
Makley, C. (1997). The meaning of liberation: Representations of Tibetan women. The Tibet Journal, 22(2), 4–29.
Marlowe, F. (1999). Male care and mating effort among Hadza foragers. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 46(1), 57–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/S002650050592
Marlowe, F. (2000). Paternal investment and the human mating system. Behavioural Processes, 51(1–3), 45–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-6357(00)00118-2
Marlowe, F. (2003). Hadza. In C. R. Ember & M. Ember (Eds.), Encyclopedia of sex and gender: Men and women in the world’s cultures (pp. 425–432). Springer Science & Business Media.
McElreath, R. (2020). Statistical rethinking: A Bayesian course with examples in R and Stan. CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315372495
Minocher, R., Duda, P., & Jaeggi, A. V. (2019). Explaining marriage patterns in a globally representative sample through socio-ecology and population history: A Bayesian phylogenetic analysis using a new supertree. Evolution and Human Behavior, 40(2), 176–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2018.11.003
Muggleton, N. K., Tarran, S. R., & Fincher, C. L. (2019). Who punishes promiscuous women? Both women and men are prejudiced towards sexually-accessible women, but only women inflict costly punishment. Evolution and Human Behavior, 40(3), 259–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2018.12.003
Murdock, G. P. (1964). Cultural correlates of the regulation of premarital sex behavior. In Process and pattern in culture: Essays in honor of Julian H. Steward (pp. 399–410). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315127453-29
Murdock, G. P., & White, D. R. (1969). Standard cross-cultural sample. Ethnology, 8(4), 329–369. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3772907
Oliver, M., & Sedikides, C. (1992). Effects of sexual permissiveness on desirability of partner as a function of low and high commitment to relationship. Social Psychology Quarterly, 55, 321–333.
Onyishi, I. E., Prokop, P., Okafor, C. O., & Pham, M. N. (2016). Female genital cutting restricts sociosexuality among the Igbo people of Southeast Nigeria. Evolutionary Psychology, 14(2), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704916648784
Paige, K., & Paige, J. M. (1981). The politics of reproductive ritual. University of California Press.
Perilloux, C., Fleischman, D. S., & Buss, D. M. (2008). The daughter-guarding hypothesis: Parental influence on, and emotional reactions to, offspring’s mating behavior. Evolutionary Psychology, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/147470490800600202
R Development Core Team. (2013). A language and environment for statistical computing, version 3.0.1. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
Rao, V. (1993). The rising price of husbands: A hedonic analysis of dowry increases in rural India. Journal of Political Economy, 101(4), 666–677. https://doi.org/10.1086/261892
Reynolds, T., Baumeister, R. F., & Maner, J. K. (2018). Competitive reputation manipulation: Women strategically transmit social information about romantic rivals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 78, 195–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.03.011
Ringen, E., Martin, J., & Jaeggi, A. (2021). Novel phylogenetic methods reveal that resource-use intensification drives the evolution of “complex” societies. EcoEvoRxiv. https://doi.org/10.32942/osf.io/wfp95
Rudman L. A., Fetterolf, J. C., & Sanchez, D. T. (2013). What motivates the sexual double standard? More support for male versus female control theory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(2), 250–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212472375
Šaffa, G., Zrzavý, J., & Duda, P. (2022). Global phylogenetic analysis reveals multiple origins and correlates of genital mutilation/cutting. Nature Human Behaviour. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-022-01321-x
Scelza, B. A., Prall, S. P., Blumenfield, T., Crittenden, A. N., Gurven, M., Kline, M., Koster, J., Kushnick, G., Mattison, S. M., Pillsworth, E., Shenk, M. K., Starkweather, K., Stieglitz, J., Sum, C. Y., Yamaguchi, K., & McElreath, R. (2020). Patterns of paternal investment predict cross-cultural variation in jealous response. Nature Human Behaviour 4(1), 20–26. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0654-y
Schacht, R., & Borgerhoff Mulder, M. (2015). Sex ratio effects on reproductive strategies in humans. Royal Society Open Science, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.140402
Schapera, I. (1933). Premarital pregnancy and native opinion. A note on social change. Africa, 6(1), 59–89.
Schlegel, A. (1991). Status, property, and the value on virginity. American Ethnologist, 18(4), 719–734. https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.1991.18.4.02a00050
Schlegel, A., & Barry, H. (1986). The cultural consequences of female contribution to subsistence. American Anthropologist, 88(1), 142–150. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1986.88.1.02a00110
Schlegel, A., & Eloul, R. (1988). Marriage transactions: Labor, property, status. American Anthropologist, 90(2), 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1988.90.2.02a00030
Smuts, B. (1992). Male aggression against women: An evolutionary perspective. Human Nature, 3(1), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02692265
Stekhoven, D. J., & Bühlmann, P. (2012). MissForest: Non-parametric missing value imputation for mixed-type data. Bioinformatics, 28(1), 112–118. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btr597
Stone, E. A., Shackelford, T. K., & Buss, D. M. (2007). Sex ratio and mate preferences: A cross-cultural investigation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37(2), 288–296. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.357
Tomasson, R. F. (1976). Premarital sexual permissiveness and illegitimacy in the Nordic countries. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 18(2), 252–270.
Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In Bernard G. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man: The Darwinian Pivot (pp. 136–179). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315129266-7
Vaillancourt, T., & Sharma, A. (2011). Intolerance of sexy peers: Intrasexual competition among women. Aggressive Behavior, 37(6), 569–577. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20413
Wilson, M., & Daly, M. (1993). An evolutionary psychological perspective on male sexual proprietariness and violence against wives. Violence and Victims, 8(3), 271–294. https://connect.springerpub.com/content/sgrvv/8/3/271.full.pdf
Worobec, C. D. (1990). Temptress or virgin? The precarious sexual position of women in postemancipation Ukrainian peasant society. Slavic Review, 49(2), 227–238.
Yanca, C., & Low, B. (2004). Female allies and female power: A cross-cultural analysis. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25(1), 9–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(03)00065-5
Funding
This research was supported by the Czech Science Foundation grant 18-23889S and by the Grant Agency of the University of South Bohemia (048/2019/P).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Šaffa, G., Duda, P. & Zrzavý, J. Paternity Uncertainty and Parent–Offspring Conflict Explain Restrictions on Female Premarital Sex across Societies. Hum Nat 33, 215–235 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-022-09426-y
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-022-09426-y