Skip to main content
Log in

Terence Horgan and John Tienson, Connectionism and the Philosophy of Psychology

  • Published:
Minds and Machines Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Aizawa, K. (1994), ‘Representations without Rules, Connectionism, and the Syntactic Argument’, Synthese 101, pp. 465–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J., and McLaughlin, B. (1990) ‘Connectionism and the Problem of Systematicity: Why Smolensky's Solution Doesn't Work’, Cognition 35, pp. 183–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J., and Pylyshyn, Z. (1988), ‘Connectionism and Cognitive Architecture’, Cognition 28, pp. 3–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papert, S. (1965), ‘Introduction’, in W. S. McCulloch, ed., Embodiments of Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. xiii–xx.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aizawa, K. Terence Horgan and John Tienson, Connectionism and the Philosophy of Psychology. Minds and Machines 9, 270–273 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008306400697

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008306400697

Keywords

Navigation