Abstract
A growing number of companies are implementing proactive environmental strategies with the objective of gaining competitive advantage through an enhanced reputation, the reduction in production costs, and a first-mover advantage in the green product market. Yet according to the natural-resource-based view, the development and maintenance of unique and valuable environmental capabilities are the central elements allowing companies to gain financial benefit from their proactive environmental strategy. In this context, management control systems can contribute to the development of environmental capabilities by focusing attention on strategic priorities and stimulating dialogue. Through a single case study, and building on Simons’ (Levers of control: how Managers use innovative control systems to drive strategic renewal, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, 1995) four levers of control, we propose a conceptual framework of management control levers that show how companies can enhance (1) stakeholder integration capability through the joint use of belief, boundary, and diagnostic control systems; (2) shared vision capability through the joint use of the belief and boundary systems; (3) organizational learning capability through the use of interactive control systems and to a lesser extent diagnostic control systems; and (4) continuous innovation capability through the use of interactive control systems, belief systems and to a lesser extent diagnostic control systems.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahrens, T., & Chapman, C. C. (2004). Accounting for flexibility and efficiency: A field study of management control systems in a restaurant chain. Contemporary Accounting Research, 21(2), 271–301.
Alt, E., Diez-de-Castro, P.-D., & Lloréns-Montes, F.-J. (2015). Linking employee stakeholders to environmental performance: The role of proactive environmental strategies and shared vision. Journal of Business Ethics, 128(1), 167–181.
Aragon-Correa, J. A., Hurtado-torres, N., Sharma, S., & Garcia-Morales, V. J. (2008). Environmental strategy and performance in small firms: A resource-based perspective. Journal of Environmental Management, 86(1), 88–103.
Aragon-Correa, J. A., & Sharma, S. (2003). A contingent resource-based view of proactive corporate environmental strategy. Academy of Management Review, 28(1), 71–88.
Arjaliès, D. L., & Mundy, J. (2013). The use of management control systems to manage CSR strategy: A levers of control perspective. Management Accounting Research, 24(4), 284–300.
Bamford, D. (2008). The use of grounded theory in change management research. Journal of Change Management, 8(2), 111–121.
Banerjee, S. B., Iyer, E. S., & Kashyap, R. K. (2003). Corporate environmentalism: Antecedents and influence of industry type. Journal of Marketing, 67(2), 99–120.
Bedford, D. S. (2015). Management control systems across different modes of innovation: Implications for firm performance. Management Accounting Research, 28, 12–30.
Berry, M. A., & Rondinelli, D. A. (1998). Proactive corporate environmental management: A new industrial revolution. Academy of Management Executive, 12(2), 38–50.
Besio, C., & Pronzini, A. (2014). Morality, ethics, and values outside and inside organizations: An exemple of the discourse on climate change. Journal of Business Ethics, 119(3), 287–300.
Bisbe, J., & Malagueno, R. (2009). The choice of interactive control systems under different innovation management tools. European Accounting Review, 18(2), 371–405.
Bisbe, J., & Otley, D. (2004). The effects of interactive use of management control systems on product innovation. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29, 709–737.
Boiral, O. (2006). Global warning: Should companies adopt a proactive strategy. Long Range Planning, 39(3), 315–330.
Boiral, O. (2007). Corporate greening through ISO 14001: A rational myth? Organization Science, 1, 127–146.
Bruining, H., Bonnet, M., & Wright, M. (2004). Management control systems and strategy change in buyouts. Management Accounting Research, 15(2), 155–177.
Chang, C.-H. (2011). The influence of corporate environmental ethics on competitive advantage: The mediation role of green innovation. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(3), 361–370.
Collins, H. M. (2001). Good to Great. New York: HarperCollins Publisher Inc.
Cooper, D. J., & Morgan, W. (2008). Case study research in accounting. Accounting Horizons, 22(2), 159–178.
Cordano, M., Marshall, R. S., & Silverman, M. (2010). How do small and medium enterprises go green? A study of environmental management programs in the U.S. wine industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 92(3), 463–478.
Crowley, C., Harre, R., & Tagg, C. (2002). Qualitative research and computing: methodological issues and practices in using QSR NVivo and NUD*IST. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 5(3), 193–197.
Dangelico, R. M., & Pujari, D. (2010). Mainstreaming green product innovations: Why and how companies integrate environmental sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 95, 471–486.
Darnall, N., Seol, I., & Sarkis, J. (2008). Perceived stakeholder influences and organizations’ use of environmental audits. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(2), 170–187.
Delgado-Ceballos, J., Aragon-Correa, J.-A., Ortiz-de-Mandojana, N., & Rueda-Manzanares, A. (2012). The effect of internal barriers and the connection between stakeholder integration and proactive environmental strategies. Journal of Business Ethics, 107(3), 281–293.
Dhanda, K. K., & Hartman, L. P. (2011). The ethics of carbon neutrality: A critical examination of voluntary carbon offset providers. Journal of Business Ethics, 100(1), 119–149.
Dibrell, C., Craig, J., Kim, J., & Johnson, A. (2015). Establishing how natural environmental competency, organizational social consciousness, and innovativeness relate. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(3), 591–605.
Dowell, G., Hart, S., & Yeung, B. (2000). Do corporate global environmental standards create or destroy market value. Management Science, 46(8), 1059–1074.
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Goebel, S., & WeiBenberger, B. E. (2017). The relationship between informal controls, ethical work climates, and organizational performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 141(3), 505–528.
Gond, J.-P., Grubnic, S., Herzig, C., & Moon, J. (2012). Configuring management control systems: theorizing the integration of strategy and sustainability. Management Accounting Research, 23(3), 205–223.
Haney, A. B. (2017). Threat interpretation and innovation in the context of climate change: An ethical perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 143(2), 261–276.
Hart, S. L. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 996–1014.
Hart, S. L., & Ahuja, G. (1996). Does it pay to be green? An empirical examination of the relationship between emission reduction and firm performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 5(1), 30–37.
Hart, S. L., & Dowell, G. (2011). A natural-resource-based view of the firm: 15 years after. Journal of Management (Invited Editorial), 37(5), 1464–1479.
Hartley, J. (2004). Case study research. London: Sage.
Henri, J.-F. (2006). Management control systems and strategy: A resource-based perspective. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 31(6), 529–558.
Henri, J. F., & Journeault, M. (2010). Eco-Control: The influence of management control systems on environmental and economic performance. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(1), 63–80.
Hoffman, K. H., Theyel, G., & Wood, C. H. (2012). Identifying firm capabilities as drivers of environmental management and sustainability practices-Evidences from small and medium sized manufacturers. Business Strategy and the Environment, 21(8), 530–545.
Holland, D., & Albrecht, C. (2013). The worldwide academic field of business ethics: Scholars’ perceptions of the most important issues. Journal of Business Ethics, 117(4), 777–788.
Huberman, A. M., & Miles, M. B. (1994). Data management and analysis methods. Handbook of qualitative research. London: N. Denzin and Y. Lincoln.
Hutchinson, C. (1996). Integrating environment policy with business strategy. Long Range Planning, 29(1), 11–23.
Jiang, R. J., & Bansal, P. (2003). Seeing the need for ISO 14001. Journal of Management Studies, 40(4), 1047–1067.
Jose, A., & Lee, S. M. (2007). Environmental reporting of global corporations: A content-analysis based on website disclosure. Journal of Business Ethics, 72(4), 307–321.
Journeault, M. (2016). The influence of the eco-control package on environmental and economic performance: A natural resource-based approach. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 28(2), 149–178.
Journeault, M., De Rongé, Y., & Henri, J.-F. (2016). Levers of eco-control and competitive environmental strategy. The British Accounting Review, 48(3), 316–340.
Kloot, L. (1997). Organizational learning and management control systems: Responding to environmental change. Management Accounting Research, 8(1), 47–73.
Lannelongue, G., Gonzalez-Benito, O., & Gonzalez-Benito, J. (2014). Environmental motivations: The pathway to complete environmental management. Journal of Business Ethics, 124(1), 135–147.
Lanoie, P., Laurent-Lucchetti, J., Johnstone, N., & Ambec, S. (2011). Environmental policy, innovation and performance: New insights on the porter hypothesis. Journal of Economic Management Strategy, 20(3), 803–841.
Lee, T. W. (1999). Using qualitative methods in organizational research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Leonidou, L. C., Christodoulides, P., Kyrgidou, L. P., & Palihawadana, D. (2017). Internal drivers and performance consequences of small firm green business strategy: The moderating role of external forces. Journal of Business Ethics, 140(3), 585–606.
Leonidou, C. N., & Leonidou, L. C. (2011). Research into environmental marketing/management: A bibliographic analysis. European Journal of Marketing, 45(1/2), 68–103.
Lisi, I. E. (2015). Translating environmental motivations into performance: The role of environmental performance measurement systems. Management Accounting Research, 29(4), 27–44.
Lopez-Gamero, M. D., Claver-Cortes, E., & Molina-Azonrin, J. F. (2008). Complementary resources and capabilities for an ethical and environmental management: A qual/quan study. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(3), 701–732.
Lovins, A. B., Hunter Lovins, L., & Hawken, P. (1999). A road map for natural capitalism. Harvard Business Review, 77(3), 145–158.
Lueg, R., & Radlach, R. (2016). Managing sustainable development with management control systems: A literature review. European Management Journal, 34(2), 158–171.
Maignan, I., & Ralston, D. A. (2002). Corporate social responsibility in Europe and the U.S.: Insights from businesses’ self-presentations. Journal of International Business Studies, 33(3), 497–514.
Menguc, B., Auh, S., & Ozanne, L. K. (2010). The interactive effect of internal and external factors on a proactive environmental strategy and its influence on a firm’s performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 94(2), 279–298.
Merton, R. K., Fiske, M., & Kendall, P. L. (1990). The focused interview: A manual of problems and procedures (2nd ed.). New York: Free Press.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication.
Molloy, J. C., Chadwick, C., Ployhart, R. E., & Golden, S. J. (2011). Making intangibles “tangibles” in test of resource-based theory: A multidisciplinary construct validation approach. Journal of Management, 37(5), 1496–1518.
Nilsson, F. (2002). Recent advances in performance management: The nordic case. European Management Journal, 20(3), 235–246.
O’Reilly, K., Paper, D., & Marx, S. (2012). Demystifying grounded theory for business research. Organizational Research Methods, 15(2), 247–262.
Perez, E. A., Correa Ruiz, C., & Carrasco Fenech, F. (2007). Environmental management systems as an embedding mechanism: A research note. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 20(3), 403–422.
Porter, M. E., & van der Linde, C. (1995). Green and competitive: Ending the stalemate. Harvard Business Review, 73(5), 120–134.
Ramus, C. A., & Steger, U. (2000). The role of supervisory support behaviours and environmental policy in employee ‘ecoinitiatives’ at leading-edge European companies. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 605–626.
Revell, A., Stokes, D., & Chen, H. (2010). Small business and the environment: Turning over a new leaf? Business Strategy and the Environment, 19(5), 273–288.
Russo, M. V., & Fouts, P. A. (1997). A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 534–559.
Scott, W. R. (2001). Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publication.
Shapiro, B. (2016). Using traditional narratives and other narrative devices to enact humanizing business practices. Journal of Business Ethics, 139(1), 1–19.
Sharma, S., Aragon-Correa, J.-A., & Rueda-Manzanares, A. (2007). The contingent influence of organizational capabilities on proactive environmental strategy in the service sector: An analysis of North American and European Ski Resorts. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 24(4), 268–283.
Sharma, S., & Vredenburg, H. (1998). Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 19(8), 729–753.
Shrivastava, P. (1995). Environmental technologies and competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 16, 183–200.
Simons, R. (1990). The role of management control systems in creating competitive advantage: New perspectives. Organizations and Society, 15(1/2), 127–143.
Simons, R. (1995). Levers of control: How managers use innovative control systems to drive strategic renewal. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Simons, R. (2000). Performance measurement and control systems for implementing strategy. New Jersey, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Snider, J., Hill, R. P., & Martin, D. (2003). Corporate social responsibility in the 21st century: A view from the world’s most successful firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 48(2), 175–187.
Tucker, B., Thorne, H., & Gurd, B. (2009). Management control and strategy: What’s been happening? Journal of Accounting Literature, 28(1), 123–163.
Welsh, E. (2002). Dealing with data: Using NVivo in the qualitative data analysis process. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 3(2), 26.
Williamson, D., Lynch-Wood, G., & Ramsay, J. (2006). Drivers of environmental behavior in manufacturing SMEs and the implications for CSR. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(3), 317–330.
Worthington, I., & Patton, D. (2005). Strategic Intent in the management of the green environment within SMEs. Long Range Planning, 38(2), 197–212.
Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). CA: Sage Thousand Oaks.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The author Elisabeth Albertini declares that she has no conflict of interest.
Appendices
Appendix 1: Main Guidelines for the Interviews with EH&S Team Members
1. EH&S team Description of the job position in the EH&S Team Description of Xerox’s environmental strategy and its evolution i.e., priorities, pollution control, pollution prevention, environmental innovation: product, manufacturing process Role of the EH&S team in the implementation of environmental strategy i.e., set or provide guidelines, managing environmental strategy, challenging environmental performance, reshaping or replacing environmental strategy, monitoring results, reporting data, employee training Certification ISO 14001 Energy Challenge 2012 program and role of the EH&S team in that program i.e., corporate communication about the EC2012 program outside and inside the company. Xerox’s commitment to the EPA Climate Leaders Program Description of the Lean Six Sigma process developed for implementing the Energy Challenge 2012 |
2. Target and goals First target: reduction by 10% greenhouse gas emission between 2002 and 2012 i.e., setting goals, previous analyses, involvement of the manufacturing team or facilities management team Evolution of the target of the program, setting a new program Explanation of the success of the first EC2012 program |
3. Data gathering and analysis Procedure, frequency, measurement tool, monitoring system Who is concerned? What kind of reporting? |
4. Diagnostic control system i.e., description of the goal and objective systems, indicators used to monitor and manage environmental performance, reporting, revision of the goal or objective. i.e., description of the automatic management tool (the Johnson Control Energy and Emissions Management Tool) i.e., audit and certification of the data disclosed |
5. Interactive control system between EH&S team and other managers i.e., meeting between EH&S team and other managers, frequency, objectives, support, face-to-face or team meeting, involvement of the top managers in environmental strategy, description of the “action plans,” description of the strategic uncertainties of Xerox’s corporate environmental strategy |
Appendix 2: NVivo Coding Themes
Hart (1995): Natural-resource-based theory | |
Pollution control and prevention: minimize emissions, effluent, and waste | Pollution control: storage of emissions or effluent, treatment of emissions or effluent, pollution control equipment or device, preserving (protecting) clean air, water, biodiversity Strategy prevention: reduction in emissions or effluent (greenhouse gas emissions), prevention of emissions or effluent, housekeeping, material substitution, manufacturing process innovation, reduction in energy consumption or water consumption, employee involvement, continuous improvement of emission reduction, cost advantage for customers, cost saving for the company |
Product stewardship | Life cycle analysis of the product, supplies return, reuse, recycling program, eco-design of the product, environmental innovation (product), competitive advantage (product), suppliers’ requirements, value chain leverage, long-term approach, green product, leader position |
Simons (1995): four levers of control | |
Belief systems (core values) | Mission statements, vision statements, credo, statements of purpose, target market |
Boundary systems (types of behavior no longer allowed, risks to be avoided) | Clear rules, limits, code of business conduct, operational guidelines, strategic planning systems, assets acquisition regulations, capital budgeting systems |
Interactive control systems (strategic uncertainties) | Face-to-face debate, meeting with operating managers, focus of attention, involvement of top managers, assumptions and action plans of subordinates, concentration on strategic uncertainties, continually challenging, action plans, management tool, reshape or replace the strategy, strategic uncertainties |
Diagnostic control systems (critical performance variables) | Profit plans, budgets—investments, goals, and objectives systems, monitoring and coordination systems, indicators, review of critical performance indicators, correcting deviation, measurement systems, feedback, achievement, audit |
Appendix 3: Inventory of Documentary Data
Type of document | Description | Authors | Date | Diffusion |
---|---|---|---|---|
Energy Managers’ quarterly newsletter | Environmental Sustainability Manager | March 2008 | Internal | |
Energy challenge 2012 reporting | Health and Safety and Sustainability Department | 2002 and 2006 | Internal/external | |
Global Citizenship Report | Health and Safety and Sustainability Department | 2006 to 2016 | External | |
Environmental Health and Safety Report | Health and Safety and Sustainability Department | 2006 to 2015 | Internal | |
Environmental Protection Agency partnership | Health and Safety and Sustainability Department | 2006 to 2010 | External | |
Preserving Our Planet through Sustainable Innovation and Development | Health and Safety and Sustainability Department | 2011 | External | |
White Paper, EPS Sustainability, Xerox Enterprise Print Service | Environmental Sustainability Manager | 2010 | Internal | |
White paper, Smarter Ways to Green: How to Make Sustainability Succeed in Your Business | Vice President Environment, Health and Safety | 2008 | External | |
Xerox and Paper: A Sustainability Reference Guide | Senior Vice President, Xerox Supplies Business Group | 2008 | Internal and external | |
Xerox and the Environment: Our Sustainability Commitment—Briefing Paper for Xerox Customers | Office and Solution Business Group (marketing product) | 2010 | Internal and external | |
Green Product Specification Development | Product Manager | 2008 and 2010 | Internal | |
Xerox guides customers to print responsibly: Helping to meet the challenge of sustainable printing | Graphic Communication Business Group (marketing printing) | 2010 | Internal and external | |
PowerPoint | Xerox Corporation Environmental Sustainability | Health and Safety and Sustainability Department | 2012 and 2014 | Internal |
PowerPoint | Xerox Enterprise Print Services: Sustainability is smart business | Education and Learning Department | 2009 | Internal |
PowerPoint | Xerox Case Studies—Good for Business, Good for the Environment | Education and Learning Department | 2009 | Internal |
PowerPoint | Xerox Innovation, Good for Business, Good for the Environment Innovation in paper Innovation in toner Innovation in multifunction devices | Education and Learning Department | 2009 | Internal |
PowerPoint | Environmental Sustainability: Our Commitment | Health and Safety and Sustainability Department | 2010 and 2012 | Internal and external |
PowerPoint | Sustainability Reporting | Health and Safety and Sustainability Department | 2010 | Internal |
PowerPoint | Xerox’s GHG Reduction Initiative | Health and Safety and Sustainability Department | 2006 and 2010 | Internal and external |
Excel and internal software | Environmental Performance Metric Report | Health and Safety and Sustainability Department | 2002–2011 | Internal |
Excel and internal software | Greenhouse Gas Emissions reporting | Health and Safety and Sustainability Department | 2002–2011 | Internal |
EC 2012 Revision | Health and Safety and Sustainability Department | 2006 | Internal | |
PowerPoint | Environment Health and Safety Seminars | Health and Safety and Sustainability Department | 2003 2006 2009 | Internal |
PowerPoint | Lean Six Sigma, Environment Modules | Health and Safety and Sustainability Department | 2006 2011 | Internal |
Appendix 4: Inventory of Interviewees and Classification
Function | Hierarchical position | Duration |
---|---|---|
Vice president, health, safety, and sustainability | Top manager | 1 h 14 min |
Environmental sustainability program manager | Top manager | 1 h 24 min |
Environmental project manager of the EA toner plant (Webster) | Middle manager | 1 h 21 min |
Energy manager for the Xerox Webster campus | Middle manager | 1 h 15 min |
Environmental program manager in charge of energy reporting | Middle managers | 1 h 25 min |
Environmental sustainability manager | Top managers | 1 h 23 min |
Environmental saving reporting | Middle manager | 1 h 28 min |
Environmental engineer focusing on water | Middle manager | 1 h 26 min |
Environmental engineer focusing on air | Top manager | 1 h 05 min |
Environmental engineer focusing on air | Middle manager | 1 h 24 min |
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Albertini, E. The Contribution of Management Control Systems to Environmental Capabilities. J Bus Ethics 159, 1163–1180 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3810-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3810-9