Skip to main content
Log in

The Contribution of Management Control Systems to Environmental Capabilities

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A growing number of companies are implementing proactive environmental strategies with the objective of gaining competitive advantage through an enhanced reputation, the reduction in production costs, and a first-mover advantage in the green product market. Yet according to the natural-resource-based view, the development and maintenance of unique and valuable environmental capabilities are the central elements allowing companies to gain financial benefit from their proactive environmental strategy. In this context, management control systems can contribute to the development of environmental capabilities by focusing attention on strategic priorities and stimulating dialogue. Through a single case study, and building on Simons’ (Levers of control: how Managers use innovative control systems to drive strategic renewal, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, 1995) four levers of control, we propose a conceptual framework of management control levers that show how companies can enhance (1) stakeholder integration capability through the joint use of belief, boundary, and diagnostic control systems; (2) shared vision capability through the joint use of the belief and boundary systems; (3) organizational learning capability through the use of interactive control systems and to a lesser extent diagnostic control systems; and (4) continuous innovation capability through the use of interactive control systems, belief systems and to a lesser extent diagnostic control systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahrens, T., & Chapman, C. C. (2004). Accounting for flexibility and efficiency: A field study of management control systems in a restaurant chain. Contemporary Accounting Research, 21(2), 271–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alt, E., Diez-de-Castro, P.-D., & Lloréns-Montes, F.-J. (2015). Linking employee stakeholders to environmental performance: The role of proactive environmental strategies and shared vision. Journal of Business Ethics, 128(1), 167–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aragon-Correa, J. A., Hurtado-torres, N., Sharma, S., & Garcia-Morales, V. J. (2008). Environmental strategy and performance in small firms: A resource-based perspective. Journal of Environmental Management, 86(1), 88–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aragon-Correa, J. A., & Sharma, S. (2003). A contingent resource-based view of proactive corporate environmental strategy. Academy of Management Review, 28(1), 71–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arjaliès, D. L., & Mundy, J. (2013). The use of management control systems to manage CSR strategy: A levers of control perspective. Management Accounting Research, 24(4), 284–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bamford, D. (2008). The use of grounded theory in change management research. Journal of Change Management, 8(2), 111–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, S. B., Iyer, E. S., & Kashyap, R. K. (2003). Corporate environmentalism: Antecedents and influence of industry type. Journal of Marketing, 67(2), 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bedford, D. S. (2015). Management control systems across different modes of innovation: Implications for firm performance. Management Accounting Research, 28, 12–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, M. A., & Rondinelli, D. A. (1998). Proactive corporate environmental management: A new industrial revolution. Academy of Management Executive, 12(2), 38–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Besio, C., & Pronzini, A. (2014). Morality, ethics, and values outside and inside organizations: An exemple of the discourse on climate change. Journal of Business Ethics, 119(3), 287–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bisbe, J., & Malagueno, R. (2009). The choice of interactive control systems under different innovation management tools. European Accounting Review, 18(2), 371–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bisbe, J., & Otley, D. (2004). The effects of interactive use of management control systems on product innovation. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29, 709–737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boiral, O. (2006). Global warning: Should companies adopt a proactive strategy. Long Range Planning, 39(3), 315–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boiral, O. (2007). Corporate greening through ISO 14001: A rational myth? Organization Science, 1, 127–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruining, H., Bonnet, M., & Wright, M. (2004). Management control systems and strategy change in buyouts. Management Accounting Research, 15(2), 155–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, C.-H. (2011). The influence of corporate environmental ethics on competitive advantage: The mediation role of green innovation. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(3), 361–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, H. M. (2001). Good to Great. New York: HarperCollins Publisher Inc.

  • Cooper, D. J., & Morgan, W. (2008). Case study research in accounting. Accounting Horizons, 22(2), 159–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cordano, M., Marshall, R. S., & Silverman, M. (2010). How do small and medium enterprises go green? A study of environmental management programs in the U.S. wine industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 92(3), 463–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowley, C., Harre, R., & Tagg, C. (2002). Qualitative research and computing: methodological issues and practices in using QSR NVivo and NUD*IST. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 5(3), 193–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dangelico, R. M., & Pujari, D. (2010). Mainstreaming green product innovations: Why and how companies integrate environmental sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 95, 471–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darnall, N., Seol, I., & Sarkis, J. (2008). Perceived stakeholder influences and organizations’ use of environmental audits. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(2), 170–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delgado-Ceballos, J., Aragon-Correa, J.-A., Ortiz-de-Mandojana, N., & Rueda-Manzanares, A. (2012). The effect of internal barriers and the connection between stakeholder integration and proactive environmental strategies. Journal of Business Ethics, 107(3), 281–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhanda, K. K., & Hartman, L. P. (2011). The ethics of carbon neutrality: A critical examination of voluntary carbon offset providers. Journal of Business Ethics, 100(1), 119–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dibrell, C., Craig, J., Kim, J., & Johnson, A. (2015). Establishing how natural environmental competency, organizational social consciousness, and innovativeness relate. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(3), 591–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowell, G., Hart, S., & Yeung, B. (2000). Do corporate global environmental standards create or destroy market value. Management Science, 46(8), 1059–1074.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goebel, S., & WeiBenberger, B. E. (2017). The relationship between informal controls, ethical work climates, and organizational performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 141(3), 505–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gond, J.-P., Grubnic, S., Herzig, C., & Moon, J. (2012). Configuring management control systems: theorizing the integration of strategy and sustainability. Management Accounting Research, 23(3), 205–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haney, A. B. (2017). Threat interpretation and innovation in the context of climate change: An ethical perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 143(2), 261–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S. L. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 996–1014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S. L., & Ahuja, G. (1996). Does it pay to be green? An empirical examination of the relationship between emission reduction and firm performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 5(1), 30–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S. L., & Dowell, G. (2011). A natural-resource-based view of the firm: 15 years after. Journal of Management (Invited Editorial), 37(5), 1464–1479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, J. (2004). Case study research. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henri, J.-F. (2006). Management control systems and strategy: A resource-based perspective. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 31(6), 529–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henri, J. F., & Journeault, M. (2010). Eco-Control: The influence of management control systems on environmental and economic performance. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(1), 63–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, K. H., Theyel, G., & Wood, C. H. (2012). Identifying firm capabilities as drivers of environmental management and sustainability practices-Evidences from small and medium sized manufacturers. Business Strategy and the Environment, 21(8), 530–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, D., & Albrecht, C. (2013). The worldwide academic field of business ethics: Scholars’ perceptions of the most important issues. Journal of Business Ethics, 117(4), 777–788.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huberman, A. M., & Miles, M. B. (1994). Data management and analysis methods. Handbook of qualitative research. London: N. Denzin and Y. Lincoln.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, C. (1996). Integrating environment policy with business strategy. Long Range Planning, 29(1), 11–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, R. J., & Bansal, P. (2003). Seeing the need for ISO 14001. Journal of Management Studies, 40(4), 1047–1067.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jose, A., & Lee, S. M. (2007). Environmental reporting of global corporations: A content-analysis based on website disclosure. Journal of Business Ethics, 72(4), 307–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Journeault, M. (2016). The influence of the eco-control package on environmental and economic performance: A natural resource-based approach. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 28(2), 149–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Journeault, M., De Rongé, Y., & Henri, J.-F. (2016). Levers of eco-control and competitive environmental strategy. The British Accounting Review, 48(3), 316–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kloot, L. (1997). Organizational learning and management control systems: Responding to environmental change. Management Accounting Research, 8(1), 47–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lannelongue, G., Gonzalez-Benito, O., & Gonzalez-Benito, J. (2014). Environmental motivations: The pathway to complete environmental management. Journal of Business Ethics, 124(1), 135–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lanoie, P., Laurent-Lucchetti, J., Johnstone, N., & Ambec, S. (2011). Environmental policy, innovation and performance: New insights on the porter hypothesis. Journal of Economic Management Strategy, 20(3), 803–841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, T. W. (1999). Using qualitative methods in organizational research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonidou, L. C., Christodoulides, P., Kyrgidou, L. P., & Palihawadana, D. (2017). Internal drivers and performance consequences of small firm green business strategy: The moderating role of external forces. Journal of Business Ethics, 140(3), 585–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonidou, C. N., & Leonidou, L. C. (2011). Research into environmental marketing/management: A bibliographic analysis. European Journal of Marketing, 45(1/2), 68–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lisi, I. E. (2015). Translating environmental motivations into performance: The role of environmental performance measurement systems. Management Accounting Research, 29(4), 27–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopez-Gamero, M. D., Claver-Cortes, E., & Molina-Azonrin, J. F. (2008). Complementary resources and capabilities for an ethical and environmental management: A qual/quan study. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(3), 701–732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovins, A. B., Hunter Lovins, L., & Hawken, P. (1999). A road map for natural capitalism. Harvard Business Review, 77(3), 145–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lueg, R., & Radlach, R. (2016). Managing sustainable development with management control systems: A literature review. European Management Journal, 34(2), 158–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maignan, I., & Ralston, D. A. (2002). Corporate social responsibility in Europe and the U.S.: Insights from businesses’ self-presentations. Journal of International Business Studies, 33(3), 497–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menguc, B., Auh, S., & Ozanne, L. K. (2010). The interactive effect of internal and external factors on a proactive environmental strategy and its influence on a firm’s performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 94(2), 279–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. K., Fiske, M., & Kendall, P. L. (1990). The focused interview: A manual of problems and procedures (2nd ed.). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molloy, J. C., Chadwick, C., Ployhart, R. E., & Golden, S. J. (2011). Making intangibles “tangibles” in test of resource-based theory: A multidisciplinary construct validation approach. Journal of Management, 37(5), 1496–1518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson, F. (2002). Recent advances in performance management: The nordic case. European Management Journal, 20(3), 235–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly, K., Paper, D., & Marx, S. (2012). Demystifying grounded theory for business research. Organizational Research Methods, 15(2), 247–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perez, E. A., Correa Ruiz, C., & Carrasco Fenech, F. (2007). Environmental management systems as an embedding mechanism: A research note. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 20(3), 403–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., & van der Linde, C. (1995). Green and competitive: Ending the stalemate. Harvard Business Review, 73(5), 120–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramus, C. A., & Steger, U. (2000). The role of supervisory support behaviours and environmental policy in employee ‘ecoinitiatives’ at leading-edge European companies. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 605–626.

    Google Scholar 

  • Revell, A., Stokes, D., & Chen, H. (2010). Small business and the environment: Turning over a new leaf? Business Strategy and the Environment, 19(5), 273–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russo, M. V., & Fouts, P. A. (1997). A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 534–559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. R. (2001). Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, B. (2016). Using traditional narratives and other narrative devices to enact humanizing business practices. Journal of Business Ethics, 139(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, S., Aragon-Correa, J.-A., & Rueda-Manzanares, A. (2007). The contingent influence of organizational capabilities on proactive environmental strategy in the service sector: An analysis of North American and European Ski Resorts. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 24(4), 268–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, S., & Vredenburg, H. (1998). Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 19(8), 729–753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrivastava, P. (1995). Environmental technologies and competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 16, 183–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simons, R. (1990). The role of management control systems in creating competitive advantage: New perspectives. Organizations and Society, 15(1/2), 127–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simons, R. (1995). Levers of control: How managers use innovative control systems to drive strategic renewal. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons, R. (2000). Performance measurement and control systems for implementing strategy. New Jersey, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snider, J., Hill, R. P., & Martin, D. (2003). Corporate social responsibility in the 21st century: A view from the world’s most successful firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 48(2), 175–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, B., Thorne, H., & Gurd, B. (2009). Management control and strategy: What’s been happening? Journal of Accounting Literature, 28(1), 123–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welsh, E. (2002). Dealing with data: Using NVivo in the qualitative data analysis process. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 3(2), 26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, D., Lynch-Wood, G., & Ramsay, J. (2006). Drivers of environmental behavior in manufacturing SMEs and the implications for CSR. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(3), 317–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worthington, I., & Patton, D. (2005). Strategic Intent in the management of the green environment within SMEs. Long Range Planning, 38(2), 197–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). CA: Sage Thousand Oaks.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elisabeth Albertini.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The author Elisabeth Albertini declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Appendices

Appendix 1: Main Guidelines for the Interviews with EH&S Team Members

1. EH&S team

Description of the job position in the EH&S Team

Description of Xerox’s environmental strategy and its evolution

i.e., priorities, pollution control, pollution prevention, environmental innovation: product, manufacturing process

Role of the EH&S team in the implementation of environmental strategy

i.e., set or provide guidelines, managing environmental strategy, challenging environmental performance, reshaping or replacing environmental strategy, monitoring results, reporting data, employee training

Certification ISO 14001

Energy Challenge 2012 program and role of the EH&S team in that program

i.e., corporate communication about the EC2012 program outside and inside the company.

Xerox’s commitment to the EPA Climate Leaders Program

Description of the Lean Six Sigma process developed for implementing the Energy Challenge 2012

2. Target and goals

First target: reduction by 10% greenhouse gas emission between 2002 and 2012

i.e., setting goals, previous analyses, involvement of the manufacturing team or facilities management team

Evolution of the target of the program, setting a new program

Explanation of the success of the first EC2012 program

3. Data gathering and analysis

Procedure, frequency, measurement tool, monitoring system

Who is concerned? What kind of reporting?

4. Diagnostic control system

i.e., description of the goal and objective systems, indicators used to monitor and manage environmental performance, reporting, revision of the goal or objective.

i.e., description of the automatic management tool (the Johnson Control Energy and Emissions Management Tool)

i.e., audit and certification of the data disclosed

5. Interactive control system between EH&S team and other managers

i.e., meeting between EH&S team and other managers, frequency, objectives, support, face-to-face or team meeting, involvement of the top managers in environmental strategy, description of theaction plans,description of the strategic uncertainties of Xerox’s corporate environmental strategy

Appendix 2: NVivo Coding Themes

Hart (1995): Natural-resource-based theory

Pollution control and prevention: minimize emissions, effluent, and waste

Pollution control: storage of emissions or effluent, treatment of emissions or effluent, pollution control equipment or device, preserving (protecting) clean air, water, biodiversity

Strategy prevention: reduction in emissions or effluent (greenhouse gas emissions), prevention of emissions or effluent, housekeeping, material substitution, manufacturing process innovation, reduction in energy consumption or water consumption, employee involvement, continuous improvement of emission reduction, cost advantage for customers, cost saving for the company

Product stewardship

Life cycle analysis of the product, supplies return, reuse, recycling program, eco-design of the product, environmental innovation (product), competitive advantage (product), suppliers’ requirements, value chain leverage, long-term approach, green product, leader position

Simons (1995): four levers of control

Belief systems (core values)

Mission statements, vision statements, credo, statements of purpose, target market

Boundary systems (types of behavior no longer allowed, risks to be avoided)

Clear rules, limits, code of business conduct, operational guidelines, strategic planning systems, assets acquisition regulations, capital budgeting systems

Interactive control systems (strategic uncertainties)

Face-to-face debate, meeting with operating managers, focus of attention, involvement of top managers, assumptions and action plans of subordinates, concentration on strategic uncertainties, continually challenging, action plans, management tool, reshape or replace the strategy, strategic uncertainties

Diagnostic control systems (critical performance variables)

Profit plans, budgetsinvestments, goals, and objectives systems, monitoring and coordination systems, indicators, review of critical performance indicators, correcting deviation, measurement systems, feedback, achievement, audit

Appendix 3: Inventory of Documentary Data

Type of document

Description

Authors

Date

Diffusion

Pdf

Energy Managers’ quarterly newsletter

Environmental Sustainability Manager

March 2008

Internal

Pdf

Energy challenge 2012 reporting

Health and Safety and Sustainability Department

2002 and 2006

Internal/external

Pdf

Global Citizenship Report

Health and Safety and Sustainability Department

2006 to 2016

External

Pdf

Environmental Health and Safety Report

Health and Safety and Sustainability Department

2006 to 2015

Internal

Pdf

Environmental Protection Agency partnership

Health and Safety and Sustainability Department

2006 to 2010

External

Pdf

Preserving Our Planet through Sustainable Innovation and Development

Health and Safety and Sustainability Department

2011

External

Pdf

White Paper, EPS Sustainability, Xerox Enterprise Print Service

Environmental Sustainability Manager

2010

Internal

Pdf

White paper, Smarter Ways to Green: How to Make Sustainability Succeed in Your Business

Vice President Environment, Health and Safety

2008

External

Pdf

Xerox and Paper: A Sustainability Reference Guide

Senior Vice President, Xerox Supplies Business Group

2008

Internal and external

Pdf

Xerox and the Environment: Our Sustainability Commitment—Briefing Paper for Xerox Customers

Office and Solution Business Group (marketing product)

2010

Internal and external

Pdf

Green Product Specification Development

Product Manager

2008 and 2010

Internal

Pdf

Xerox guides customers to print responsibly: Helping to meet the challenge of sustainable printing

Graphic Communication Business Group (marketing printing)

2010

Internal and external

PowerPoint

Xerox Corporation Environmental Sustainability

Health and Safety and Sustainability Department

2012 and 2014

Internal

PowerPoint

Xerox Enterprise Print Services: Sustainability is smart business

Education and Learning Department

2009

Internal

PowerPoint

Xerox Case Studies—Good for Business, Good for the Environment

Education and Learning Department

2009

Internal

PowerPoint

Xerox Innovation, Good for Business, Good for the Environment

 Innovation in paper

 Innovation in toner

 Innovation in multifunction devices

Education and Learning Department

2009

Internal

PowerPoint

Environmental Sustainability: Our Commitment

Health and Safety and Sustainability Department

2010 and 2012

Internal and external

PowerPoint

Sustainability Reporting

Health and Safety and Sustainability Department

2010

Internal

PowerPoint

Xerox’s GHG Reduction Initiative

Health and Safety and Sustainability Department

2006 and 2010

Internal and external

Excel and internal software

Environmental Performance Metric Report

Health and Safety and Sustainability Department

2002–2011

Internal

Excel and internal software

Greenhouse Gas Emissions reporting

Health and Safety and Sustainability Department

2002–2011

Internal

Pdf

EC 2012 Revision

Health and Safety and Sustainability Department

2006

Internal

PowerPoint

Environment Health and Safety Seminars

Health and Safety and Sustainability Department

2003

2006

2009

Internal

PowerPoint

Lean Six Sigma, Environment Modules

Health and Safety and Sustainability Department

2006

2011

Internal

Appendix 4: Inventory of Interviewees and Classification

Function

Hierarchical position

Duration

Vice president, health, safety, and sustainability

Top manager

1 h 14 min

Environmental sustainability program manager

Top manager

1 h 24 min

Environmental project manager of the EA toner plant (Webster)

Middle manager

1 h 21 min

Energy manager for the Xerox Webster campus

Middle manager

1 h 15 min

Environmental program manager in charge of energy reporting

Middle managers

1 h 25 min

Environmental sustainability manager

Top managers

1 h 23 min

Environmental saving reporting

Middle manager

1 h 28 min

Environmental engineer focusing on water

Middle manager

1 h 26 min

Environmental engineer focusing on air

Top manager

1 h 05 min

Environmental engineer focusing on air

Middle manager

1 h 24 min

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Albertini, E. The Contribution of Management Control Systems to Environmental Capabilities. J Bus Ethics 159, 1163–1180 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3810-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3810-9

Keywords

Navigation