Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton December 19, 2017

The framing of Muslims on the Spanish Internet

  • Manuel Alcántara-Plá

    Manuel Alcántara-Plá is Associate Professor in the Department of Linguistics and Modern Languages at the Universidad Autónoma de Madrid. He is member of the Wor(l)ds Lab research group. His research interests include corpus linguistics, discourse, and digital communication. More specifically, his current work examines the linguistic characteristics of the New Media using Corpus Assisted Discourse Studies. He is the PI of the project “Framing and Articulation Strategies in the Political Discourse on Twitter” (2015-2017), and co-editor in chief of the international journal CHIMERA: Romance Corpora and Linguistic Studies.

    EMAIL logo
    and Ana Ruiz-Sánchez

    Ana Ruiz Sánchez is Associate Professor in the Department of Linguistics and Modern Languages at the Universidad Autónoma de Madrid and has a European PhD in German Studies. She is member of the Wor(l)ds Lab research group. She is a researcher in the Project “Framing and Articulation Strategies in the Political Discourse on Twitter” (2015-2017). She is interested in the analysis of intercultural discourse in Europe, and works as a consultant on Human Rights and Minorities. She is co-author of Interkulturelle Literatur in Deutschland (Metzler 2000) and Bewegte Sprache: Vom ‘Gastarbeiterdeutsch’ zum interkulturellen Schreiben (Thelem 2014). She coordinates the Spanish civic initiative Pacto de Convivencia.

From the journal Lodz Papers in Pragmatics

Abstract

In this work we study the representation of Muslims on the Internet in Spain. After the terrorist attacks in Europe, Islamophobia and Muslimophobia have grown considerably in our society. There is a strong rejection of Muslim groups and individuals, they are perceived not only as different, but also as dangerous and violent. We follow a cognitive linguistics approach using corpus linguistics as a methodology in order to know which concepts are related to Muslims in discourse. We have used three corpora: the Spanish part of the esTenTen corpus, which is a large web corpus intended to give a picture of the Spanish language on the Internet; a Twitter corpus encompassing tweets published by five main political parties in Spain and their candidates in 2015-2016; and a third corpus of articles on the topic “Muslims” from four important digital newspapers (El País, La Vanguardia, La Voz de Galicia, and ABC). We examine word co-occurrence patterns of islámico (‘Islamic’) and musulmán (‘Muslim’) to shed light on the stigmatization of this minority in the online discourse and its frequent presence in negative frames.

About the authors

Manuel Alcántara-Plá

Manuel Alcántara-Plá is Associate Professor in the Department of Linguistics and Modern Languages at the Universidad Autónoma de Madrid. He is member of the Wor(l)ds Lab research group. His research interests include corpus linguistics, discourse, and digital communication. More specifically, his current work examines the linguistic characteristics of the New Media using Corpus Assisted Discourse Studies. He is the PI of the project “Framing and Articulation Strategies in the Political Discourse on Twitter” (2015-2017), and co-editor in chief of the international journal CHIMERA: Romance Corpora and Linguistic Studies.

Ana Ruiz-Sánchez

Ana Ruiz Sánchez is Associate Professor in the Department of Linguistics and Modern Languages at the Universidad Autónoma de Madrid and has a European PhD in German Studies. She is member of the Wor(l)ds Lab research group. She is a researcher in the Project “Framing and Articulation Strategies in the Political Discourse on Twitter” (2015-2017). She is interested in the analysis of intercultural discourse in Europe, and works as a consultant on Human Rights and Minorities. She is co-author of Interkulturelle Literatur in Deutschland (Metzler 2000) and Bewegte Sprache: Vom ‘Gastarbeiterdeutsch’ zum interkulturellen Schreiben (Thelem 2014). She coordinates the Spanish civic initiative Pacto de Convivencia.

Acknowledgements

We thank the editors and the anonymous reviewers for their careful reading of our manuscript and their many insightful comments and suggestions. We also thank the members of our research group Wor(l)ds Lab at the Universidad Autónoma de Madrid for their comments and support. The study reported in this article is part of the project Estrategias de encuadre y articulación del discurso politico en 140 caracteres, funded by the Spanish Ministry of Economic Affairs (FFI-2014-53958-P).

References

Adorno, Theodor W., Else Frenkel-Brunwik, Daniel Levinson, & R. Newit Sanford. 1965. La personalidad autoritaria. Buenos Aires: Editorial Proyección.Search in Google Scholar

Alcántara-Pla, Manuel & Ana Ruiz. 2017. Not for Twitter: Migration as a silenced topic in 2015 Spain General Election. In Melani Schröter & Charlotte Taylor (eds.), Exploring silence and absence in discourse: Empirical approaches. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-3-319-64580-3_2Search in Google Scholar

Alcántara-Pla, Manuel & Ana Ruiz. (forthcoming). ¿Quién es el pueblo? La exclusión de las minorías en la campaña electoral 2015 en España. In Francoise Sullet-Nylander (ed.), Political discourse and the extremes in the Romance speaking countries. Stockholm: Stockholm University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Allport, Gordon. 1962. La naturaleza del prejuicio. Buenos Aires: Eudeba.Search in Google Scholar

Andrés, Francisco de. 21 February, 2017. El velo islámico: ¿tradición o símbolo religioso?), ABChttp://www.abc.es/sociedad/abci-velo-islamico-tradicion-o-simbolo-religioso-201702211706_noticia.html (accesssed 21 February 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Awass, Omar. 1996. The representation of Islam in the American media. Hamdard Islamicus 19(3). 87–102.Search in Google Scholar

Baker, Paul, Costas Gabrielatos & Tony McEnery. 2012. Sketching Muslims: A corpus driven analysis of representations around the word “Muslim” in the British press 1998-2009. Applied Linguistics 34(3). 255–278.10.1093/applin/ams048Search in Google Scholar

Baroni, Marco, Adam Kilgarriff, J. Pomikálek & Pavel Rychlý. 2006. WebBootCaT: A web tool for instant corpora. Torino: Proc. Euralex.Search in Google Scholar

Barsalou, Laurence W. 1992. Frames, concepts, and conceptual fields. In Adrienne Lehrer & Eva Feder Kittay (eds.), Frames fields, and contrasts, 21–74. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar

Bernal del Castillo, Jesús. 2014. Política Criminal en España y discriminación xenófoba: la centralidad de los delitos de provocación a la discriminación. Política criminal 9(18). 371–399.10.4067/S0718-33992014000200003Search in Google Scholar

Blanco, Amalio, Javier Horcajo & Flor Sánchez. 2016. Cognición social. Madrid: Pearson.Search in Google Scholar

Busse, Dietrich. 2012. Frame-Semantik. Ein Kompendium. Berlin: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110269451Search in Google Scholar

Brin, Sergey & Lawrence Page. 1998. The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual Web search engine. Stanford: Stanford University http://infolab.stanford.edu/~backrub/google.html (accessed 1 August 2017).10.1016/S0169-7552(98)00110-XSearch in Google Scholar

Brown, Rupert. 1995. Prejuicio. Su Psicología social. Madrid: Alianza.Search in Google Scholar

Cheng, Jennifer E. 2015. Islamophobia, Muslimophobia or racism? Parliamentary discourses on Islam and Muslims in debates on the minaret ban in Switzerland. Discourse & Society 26(5). 562–586.10.1177/0957926515581157Search in Google Scholar

Dietz, Gunther. 2004. Mujeres musulmanas en Granada: discursos sobre comunidad, exclusión de género y discriminación etnorreligiosa. Migraciones Internacionales 2(3). 5–33.Search in Google Scholar

Fillmore, Charles J. 1982. Frame semantics. Linguistics in the morning calm. Seoul: Hanshin Publishing Co.10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/00424-7Search in Google Scholar

Glynn, Dylan. 2010. Synonymy, lexical fields, and grammatical constructions. A study in usagebased cognitive semantics. In Hans Schmid & Susanne Handl, Cognitive foundations of linguistic usage patterns, 89–118. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110216035.89Search in Google Scholar

Kilgarriff, Adam, Vít Baisa, Jan Bušta, Miloš Jakubíček, Vojtěch Kovvár, Jan Michelfeit, Pavel Rychlý & Vít Suchomel. 2014. The Sketch Engine: Ten years on. Lexicography 1. 7–36.10.1007/s40607-014-0009-9Search in Google Scholar

Kilgarriff, Adam & Irene Renau. 2013. esTenTen, a vast web corpus of Peninsular and American Spanish. Procedia: Social and Behavioural Sciences 95. 12–19.10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.617Search in Google Scholar

Kopytowska, Monika. 2009. Corpus linguistics and an eclectic approach to the study of news – the mechanism of framing.” In Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk & Katarzyna Dziwirek (eds.), Studies in cognitive corpus linguistics, 83–109. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar

Kopytowska, Monika. 2017. Discourses of hate and radicalism in action. In Monika Kopytowska (ed.), Contemporary discourses of hate and radicalism across space and genres, 1–12. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/bct.93Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George. 2004. Don’t think of an elephant. Hartford: Chelsea Green Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald. 1991. Foundations of cognitive grammar. Descriptive application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Leezenberg, Michiel. 2017a. Free speech, hate speech, and hate beards. In Daniel Silva (ed.), Language and violence: Pragmatic perspectives, 141–170. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.279.07leeSearch in Google Scholar

Leezenberg, Michiel. 2017b. Discursive violence and responsibility: Notes on the pragmatics of Dutch populism. In Monika Kopytowska (ed.), Contemporary discourses of hate and radicalism across space and genres, 243–270. Amsterdam/Philadephia: John Benjamins.10.1075/bct.93.09leeSearch in Google Scholar

Martínez-Torrón, Javier. 2009. La cuestión del velo islámico en la jurisprudencia de Estrasburgo. Madrid: Delta Publicaciones.Search in Google Scholar

Moore, Kerry, Paul Mason & Justin Matthew Lewis. 2008. Images of Islam in the UK: The representation of British Muslims in the national print news media 2000-2008. Cardiff: Cardiff School of Journalism, Media and Cultural Studies.Search in Google Scholar

Pérez de la Fuente, Óscar. 2010. El enfoque español sobre el lenguaje de odio. In Oliva Martínez & J. Daniel (eds.), Una discusión sobre identidad, minorías y solidaridad, 133–156. Madrid: Dykinson.Search in Google Scholar

Rychlý, Pavel. 2008. A lexicographer-friendly association score. In Petr Sojka & Aleš Horak (eds.), Proceedings of Recent Advances in Slavonic Natural Language Processing, 6–9. Karlova Studánka: Masaryk University.Search in Google Scholar

Rosati, Sara. 6 June, 2017. Cuando llevar el velo islámico te deja sin trabajo. El Paíshttp://www.abc.es/sociedad/abci-velo-islamico-tradicion-o-simbolo-religioso-201702211706_noticia.html (accessed 30 June 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Ruiz, Juan José. 2011. La prohibición del velo islámico en la enseñanza pública: la perspectiva de la igualdad de género. Revista Española De Derecho Constitucional 92. 103–140.Search in Google Scholar

Said, Edward. 1978. Orientalism. Pantheon Books.Search in Google Scholar

van Dijk, Teun A. 1998. Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: Sage.Search in Google Scholar

van Dijk, Teun A. 2016. Critical discourse studies: A socio-cognitive approach. In Ruth Wodak & Michael Meyer, Methods of Critical Discourse Studies, 143–176. London: Sage.10.4324/9781315739342-3Search in Google Scholar

van Leeuwen, Theo. 1996. The representation of social actors. In Carmen Rosa Caldas-Coulthard & Malcolm Coulthard (eds.), Texts and practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis, 32–70. London : Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Von Sikorski, Christian, Desirée Schmuck, Jörg Matthes & Alice Binder. 2017. “Muslims are not Terrorists”: Islamic State coverage, journalistic differentiation between terrorism and Islam, fear reactions, and attitudes toward Muslims. Mass Communication and Society 20(6). 825–848.10.1080/15205436.2017.1342131Search in Google Scholar

Wodak, Ruth & Michael Meyer. 2016. Methods of Critical Discourse Studies, 3rd edn. London: Sage.10.4324/9781315540535Search in Google Scholar

Appendix

Table 1

Collocations with islámico (‘Islamic’).

WORDENGLISHFREQ.SCORE
árabeArab63811.63
judíoJew829.34
cristianoChristian1129.07
mudejarMudcjar168.27
shan aSharia87.65
hebreoHebrew117.57
hindúHindu7.53
budistaBudist87.31
judaicoJudaic67.21
occidentalOccidental197.2
bizantinoByzantine87.2
romanoRoman237.15
visigodoVisigoth87.15
medievalMedieval157.12
evangélicoEvangelical77.07
orientalOriental186.9
hispánicoHispanic76.86
protestanteProtestant66.71
musulmánMuslim116.62
católicoCatholic75.97
africanoAfrican65.63
europeoEuropean113.86

Table 2

Collocations with musulmán (‘Muslim’).

WORDENGLISHFREQ.SCORE
judíoJew40311.31
cristianoChristian60011.28
árabeArab39010.73
hindúHindu589.39
católicoCatholic628.75
visigodoVisigoth358.62
romanoRoman668.41
budistaBudist248.18
hebreoHebrew237.99
protestanteProtestant217.86
croataCroatian197.86
occidentalOccidental247.21
evangélicoEvangelic117.01
gitanaGypsy127.0
ateoAtheist126.9
bizantinoByzantine106.84
medievalMedieval166.82
africanoAfrican176.79
ortodoxoOrthodox106.77
mudéjarMudejar96.73
islámicoIslamic116.62
amatistasAnimistic76.56
coptoCoptic66.33
serbioSerbian76.33
arabesArabs66.33

Table 3

Nouns modified by islámico (‘Islamic’).

WORDENGLISHFREQ.SCORE
terrorismoTerrorism7159.56
veloHeadscarf5089.3
fondamentalismoFundamentalism3938.99
repúblicaRepublic12728.93
magre bMaghreb3098.71
terroristaTerrist3228.52
religiónReligion4528.46
yihadJihad2368.32
integrismo[ntegrism2028.08
revoluciónRevolution5037.92
fundamentalistaFundamentalist1757.88
extremistaExtremist1567.71
radicalismoRadicalism1307.43
integristaFundamentalist1217.36
inundoWorld13897.31
combatienteFighter1137.16
pañueloScarf956.89
épocaTime2866.81
resistenciaResistance1726.76
radicalRadical936.76
extremismoExtremism796.73
culturaCulture4336.55
hamásHamas676.51
arteArt4086.5
civilizaciónCivilization1036.49

Table 4

Nouns modified by musulmán (‘Muslim’).

WORDENGLISHFREQ.SCORE
hermanosBrothers140810.72
religiónReligion6Ü58.9
dominaciónDomination2998.47
invasiónInvasion3548.43
épocaTime5777.83
mujerWoman7397.39
inmigranteImmigrant1997.37
mundoWorldI34U7.26
hermandadBrotherhood1237.09
mezquitaMosque1147.06
mayoríaMajority4057.05
fortalezaFort1367.04
origenOrigin4116.98
reinoKingdom1446.97
poblaciónPopulation6016.92
conquistaConquest1086.86
paísCountry10666.85
minoríaMinority1146.81
cementerioCemetery956.64
EspañaSpain2296.62
castilloCastle1176.6
ocupaciónOccupation1346.59
clérigoCleric716.55
dominioDomain2056.41
alqueríaFarmhouse576.27

Table 5

Nouns modified by islámico (‘Islamic’).

WORDENGLISHFREQ.SCORE
estadoState4Ü513.28
mundoWorld10.23
leyLaw279.9
centroCenter9.44
comunidadCommunity199.3
religiónReligion169.12
feminismoFeminism159.12
terrorismoTerrorism159.09
veloHeadscarf138.9
juntaCouncil98.39
tradiciónTradition88.2
grupoGroup98.16
paísCountry98.16
comisiónCommission78.03
consejoCouncil78.0
comunidadesCommunities67.82
funda m enta li s moFundamentalism67.81
ritoRite67.8
calendarioCalendar57.55
pañueloScarf57.55
feFaith57.55
califatoCaliphate57.54
pensamientoThought57.53
organizaciónOrganization57.47
movimientoMovement47.18

Published Online: 2017-12-19
Published in Print: 2017-12-20

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 15.5.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/lpp-2017-0013/html
Scroll to top button