skip to main content
article

Academic personality and the commodification of academic texts

Authors Info & Claims
Published:25 November 2002Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

This paper explores the nature of, and justification for, copyright in academic texts in the light of recent developments in information technology, in particular the growth of electronic publication on the internet. Copyright, like other forms of property, is best thought of as a cluster of rights. A distinction is drawn within this cluster between first order `control rights' and higher order `commodity rights'. It is argued that copyright in academic texts is founded on its role as a means to allow academics to fulfil their role responsibilities. While the possession and exercise by academics of commodity rights can be thus justified in the case of mechanical print-based publication, since this helps make possible the reproduction and dissemination of academic texts, they cannot be so justified in the case of electronic publication. There are nevertheless good reasons to retain various control rights.

References

  1. Andrew Alexandra and Seumas Miller. Copyright in Teaching Materials. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 33(1): 87-96, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Kenneth Arrow. Economic Activity and the Allocation of Resources for Invention. In R. R. Nelson, editor, The Rate and Direction of Incentive Activity; Economic and Social Factors, pp. 609-624. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1962.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. C. A. J. Coady. Testimony. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Joel Feinberg. Voluntary Euthanasia and the Inalienable Right to Life. In Sterling M. McMurrin, editor, The Tanner Lectures on Human Values: 1, pp. 221-251. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1980.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Stephen C. Ferruolo. The Origins of the University: The Schools of Paris and their Critics, 1100-1215. Stanford University Press, Stanford, 1985.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. H. L. A. Hart. The Concept of Law. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1961.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. International Convention for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants. Plant Breeder's Rights Act 1994 (Australia).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Ann L. Monotti. Ownership of Copyright in Traditional Literary Works within Universities. Federal Law Review, 22(2): 340- 374, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Margaret, R. Somers. The "Misteries" of Property: Relationality, Rural-Industrialisation and Community in Chartist Narratives of Political Rights. In J. Brewer and S. Staves, editors, Early Modern Conceptions of Property, pp. 62-91. Routledge, London, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. John Rawls. A Theory of Justice. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1972.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Joseph Raz. The Morality of Freedom. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1986.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Jeremy Waldron. The Right To Private Property. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1988.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Academic personality and the commodification of academic texts

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

          Other Metrics