Skip to main content
Log in

The moral high ground: Reflections on ethical dilemmas in unethical circumstances

  • Published:
Monash Bioethics Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we reflect on the challenges of maintaining traditional ethical standards in social health research with asylum seeker detainees. Researchers in this context who begin from a clear advocacy position can face various dilemmas in the research process. The need to demonstrate particular research outcomes that support an advocacy position has the potential to compromise the veracity of the research endeavour. We review the potential benefits and risks to researchers and asylum seekers in this area, and argue that such research must be faithful to the realities encountered, so that rigour is not compromised by the interests of advocacy and a researcher’s own moral imperatives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Allotey, P., Lazroo, C. The moral high ground: Reflections on ethical dilemmas in unethical circumstances. Monash Bioethics Review 23, S78–S84 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03351422

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03351422

Keywords

Navigation