Skip to content
BY-NC-ND 4.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter Open Access October 30, 2018

The Metaphysical Subject and Logical Space: Solipsism and Singularity in the Tractatus

  • M. Curtis Allen EMAIL logo
From the journal Open Philosophy

Abstract

This essay presents a heterodox reading of the issue of solipsism in Wittgenstein’s Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus (TLP), out of which the whole of the TLP can be re-read. Inspired by, though not dependent on, the themes of virtuality and singularity found in Deleuze’s ‘transcendental empiricism’ (presented as a Wittgensteinian ‘immaculate conception’), Wittgenstein’s concept of ‘logical space’ is here complexly related to the paradoxes of the ‘metaphysical subject’ and ‘solipsism,’ within which the strictures of sense are defined, and through which the logico-pictorial scaffolding of the TLP precipitates its own systematic dissolution. It shows how nonsense envelopes not only not idle chatter, and metaphysical confusion, but sense itself.

References

Boltzmann, Ludwig. Lectures on Gas Theory. Trans. Stephen G. Brush. New York: Dover Publications, 1995.Search in Google Scholar

Boltzmann, Ludwig. Theoretical Physics and Philosophical Problems. Trans. Paul Foulkes. Ed. Brian McGuiness. Boston: D. Reidel, 1974.Search in Google Scholar

Carnap, Rudolf. The Logical Syntax of Language. Trans. Amethe Smeaton. Peru, IL: Open Court, 2002.Search in Google Scholar

Deleuze, Gilles. The Logic of Sense. Trans. Mark Lester. New York: Columbia UP, 1990.Search in Google Scholar

Griffin, James. Wittgenstein’s Logical Atomism. Oxford: Claredon Press, 1964.Search in Google Scholar

Floyd, Juliet. “The Uncaptive Eye: Solipsism in Wittgenstein’s Tractatus.” Philosophies of Loneliness, 79-108. Ed. Leroy S. Rouner. South Bend: University of Notre Dame Press, 1998. Online.Search in Google Scholar

Hertz, Heinrich. The Principles of Mechanics. Trans. D. E. Jones and J. T. Walley. New York: Dover, 1956.Search in Google Scholar

Hacker, P. M. S. Insight and Illusion: Themes in the Philosophy of Wittgenstein. London: Oxford UP, 1997.Search in Google Scholar

Hamilton, Kelly. “Darstellungen in the Principles of Mechanics and the Tractatus: The Representation of Objects in Relation in Hertz and Wittgenstein.” Perspectives on Science 10:1 (2002): 28-68.10.1162/106361402762674799Search in Google Scholar

Harré, Rom. “Wittgenstein: Science and Religion.” Philosophy 76:2 (2001), 211 - 237.10.1017/S0031819101000249Search in Google Scholar

Hintikka, Jaakko. “On Wittgenstein’s ‘Solipsism’.” Mind 67:265 (1958), 88-91.10.1093/mind/LXVII.265.88Search in Google Scholar

Kallenberg, Brad. “Rethinking Fideism Though the Lens of Wittgenstein’s Engineering Outlook.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 71:1 (2012), 55-73.10.1007/s11153-011-9327-0Search in Google Scholar

Kenny, Anthony. Wittgenstein. Malden, MA: Blackwell. 2006.10.1002/9780470776643Search in Google Scholar

Nolte, David D. “The Tangled Tale of Phase Space.” Physics Today 63:4 (2010), 33-38.10.1063/1.3397041Search in Google Scholar

Monk, Ray. Ludwig Wittgenstein: The Duty of Genius. London: Jonathan Cape, 1990.Search in Google Scholar

Pârvu, Ilie. “‘Meine Grundgedanke ist…’ The Structural Theory of Representation as the Metaphysics of Wittgenstein’s Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus.” Synthese 129:2 (2001), 259-274.Search in Google Scholar

Pears, D. F. “Wittgenstein’s Treatment of Solipsism in the Tractatus.” Crítica: Revista Hispanoamericana De Filosofía 6:16/17(1972), 57-84.10.22201/iifs.18704905e.1972.133Search in Google Scholar

Pihlström, Sami. “A Solipsist in a Real World.” Dialectica 50:4 (2005), 275-90.10.1111/j.1746-8361.1996.tb00014.xSearch in Google Scholar

Swoyer, Chris. “Structural Representation and Surrogative Reasoning.” Synthese 87:3 (1991), 449-508.10.1007/BF00499820Search in Google Scholar

Tang, Hao. “Transcendental Idealism in Wittgenstein’s Tractatus.” The Philosophical Quarterly 61:244 (2011), 598-607.10.1111/j.1467-9213.2011.697.xSearch in Google Scholar

Turner, Jason. The Facts in Logical Space: A Tractarian Ontology. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2016.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199682812.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Wilson, Mark. “Wittgenstein: Physica sunt, Non Leguntur.” Philosophical Topics 25:2 (1997), 289-316.10.5840/philtopics199725215Search in Google Scholar

Weisstein, Eric W. “Singularity.” MathWorld-A Wolfram Web Resource. Online. 22 Apr. 2017. http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Singularity.html.Search in Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Notebooks, 1914-1916: 2nd Edition. Ed. G. H. v. Wright. Trans. G. E. M. Anscombe. Chicago: U. Chicago, 1984.Search in Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Translated by C. K. Ogden [and F. P. Ramsey]. London: Routledge &Kegan Paul, 1922.Search in Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Translated by D. F. Pears and B. F. McGuinness. London: Routledge, 2001.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2018-06-17
Accepted: 2018-09-20
Published Online: 2018-10-30
Published in Print: 2018-10-01

© by M. Curtis Allen, published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Downloaded on 4.5.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/opphil-2018-0020/html
Scroll to top button