Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Non-identity Problem and «Historical Victims»

  • Published:
Philosophia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent decades have seen a considerable and progressive increase in historical claims. Within the context of colonialism criticism, but also outside this sphere, numerous politicians, collectives and intellectuals have emerged to denounce certain acts of the past, demanding recognition and repentance that would compensate for these past affronts. In this article we will analyze one of these cases: the demand for an apology from Spain and the Vatican by the President of Mexico, López Obrador. Taking as a guide the debate around the ethical problem of non-identity (which questions the possibility of someone being a victim of an act on which his or her own existence depends), we will see what ethical and metaphysical assumptions serve as the basis for these claims. We will also assess whether the claims of the so-called «historical victims» are consistent and ethically acceptable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. These authors have developed serious historiographical comparisons between both imperial models.

References

  • Baets, A. (2015) Democracia y Escritura de La Historia. Historiografías: Revista de Historia y Teoría, vol. 9, pp. 31–43.

  • Boonin, D. (2014). The non-identity problem and the ethics of future people. Oxford Scholarship Online. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199682935.001.0001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burbank, J. (2010). Empires in world history: Power and the politics of difference. Princeton University Press.

  • Celermajer, D. (2009). The sins of the nation and the ritual of apologies. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.

  • Douglas, T., and Devolder, K. (2013). Procreative Altruism: Beyond Individualism in Reproductive Selection. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 38(4), 400–419.

  • Dussel, E. D., Jáuregui, C. A., & Moraña, M. (2008). Colonialism and its replicants. In Dussel, E. D., Jáuregui, C. A., & Moraña, M. (Eds.) Coloniality at large: Latin America and the postcolonial debate. Duke University Press.

  • EFE (2019). «López Obrador insiste en que España debe pedir perdón por los “abusos” de la conquista». El Confidencial. https://www.elconfidencial.com/mundo/2019-10-11/lopez-obrador-mexico-espana-pida-perdon-abusos-conquista_2279939/. Accessed 29 Dec 2020.

  • Elliott, J. H. (2008). Empires of the Atlantic World: Britain and Spain in America 1492–1830. Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, R. (1989). The rights of future people. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 6(2), 59–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernández Sebastián, J. (2021). Pasado irreversible, pasado irrevocable. De historia, anacronismos, crímenes, memoria y olvido. En Tiempos de la Historia, Tiempos del Derecho (pp. 93–140). Marcial Pons.

  • Finneron-Burns, E. (2016). Contractualism and the non-identity problem. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 19(5), 1151–1163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giglioli, D. (2017). Crítica de la víctima. Herder.

  • Harman, E. (2004). Can we harm and benefit in creating? Philosophical Perspectives, 18, 89–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobsbawm, E. J., & Ranger, T. O. (1983). The invention of tradition. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, R. J. (2006). Cheap listening? Reflections on the concept of wrongful disability. Bioethics, 20(2), 55–63.

  • Kahane, G. (2009). Non-identity, self-defeat, and attitudes to future children. Philosophical Studies, 145(2), 193–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, R. (2009). Wronging future people: A contractualist proposal. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D. (1986). On the plurality of worlds. Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D. (2003). Things qua truthmakers. Lillehammer, H., Rodriguez-Pereyra, G., (2003). Real metaphysics: Essays in honour of D.H. Mellor. Routledge.

  • Magnusson, E. (2018). Children’s rights and the non-identity problem. Canadian Journal of Philosophy. https://doi.org/10.1080/00455091.2018.1463798.p.10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mcbrayer, J. (2008). Rights, indirect harms and the non-identity problem. Bioethics, 22(6), 299–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mello Rangel, M., y Lopes de Araujo, V. (2015) «Theory and History of Historiography: From the Linguistic Turn to the Ethical-Political Turn». História Da Historiografia, n.o 17 (29 de abril de 2015). https://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revista/article/view/928.

  • Nobles, M. (2008). The politics of official apologies. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nora, P. (1983). Les lieux de mémoire (pp. 1982–1997). Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olick, J. K. (2013). The politics of regret: On collective memory and historical responsibility. Taylor and Francis.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Parfit, D. (1984). Reasons and persons. Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson, I., & Savulescu, J. (2019). The meaning of life, equality and eternity. Journal of Ethics, 23, 223–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, P. G. (2009). In Roberts, M. A., & Wasserman, D. T. (Eds.), Harming future persons: Ethics, genetics and the nonidentity problem. Springer.

  • Restall, M. (2019). When Montezuma met Cortés: The true story of the meeting that changed history. Ecco.

  • Roberts, M. (1998). Child versus childmaker: Future persons and present duties in ethics and the law. Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, M. A.,& and Wasserman, D. T. (2009) Harming future persons: Introduction. In Roberts, M. A. and Wasserman, D. T. (Eds.), Harming future persons: Ethics, genetics and the nonidentity problem. Springer, pp. XIX–XX.

  • Rothermund, D. (2015) Introduction. Memories of post-imperial nations. In Dietmar R (Ed.), Memories of post-imperial nations: The aftermath of decolonization, 1945–2013. Cambridge University Press, pp. 12–33.

  • Rossi, J. J. (2015). Echoes of European Colonialism in South America. In B. Sébe, K. Nicolaïdis, & G. Maas (Eds.), Echoes of empire: Memory, identity and colonial legacies (pp. 69–87). IBTauris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, R. (2011). Questionable associations: The role of forgiveness in transitional justice. The International Journal of Transitional Justice, 5(1), 119–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savulescu, Julian. (2001). Procreative beneficence: Why we should select the best children. Bioethics, 413.

  • Savulescu J. and Kahane G. (2016). Understanding procreative beneficence. In Leslie F (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of reproductive ethics. Online Publication Date: Sep 2016.

  • Scanlon, T. (1998). What we owe to each other. Cambridge, Mass.; London: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

  • Shiffrin, S. V. (1999). Wrongful life, procreative responsibility, and the significance of harm. Legal Theory, 5, 117–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smolkin, D. (1999). Toward a rights-based solution to the non-identity problem. Journal of Social Philosophy, 30(1), 194–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinbock, B. (2009).“Wrongful life and procreative decisions. In Roberts, M. A., & Wasserman, D. T. (Ed.). Harming future persons: Ethics, genetics and the nonidentity problem. Springer.

  • Stoler, A. L. (2016). Duress. Duke University Press.

  • Stoller, S. E. (2008). Why we are not morally required to select the best children: A response to Savulescu. Bioethics, 22, 364–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00659.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. (2000). The apology paradox. The Philosophical Quarterly, 50(201), 470–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toth, M. (2015). The myth of the politics of regret. Millennium, 43(2), 561–566. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829814555942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trouillot, M. (2000). Abortive rituals: Historical apologies in the global era. Interventions (london, England), 2(2), 171–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Velleman, J. (2008). Persons in prospect. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 36(3), 221–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wayne, K., & Overall, C. (2013). Toward a virtue-centred ethics of reproduction, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses.

  • Woodward, J. (1986). The non-identity problem. Ethics, 96(4), 804–831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wrigley, A. (2012). Harm to future persons: Non-identity problems and counterpart solutions. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 15(2), 175–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank an anonymous reviewer for her/his helpful comments.

Funding

This article is funded by FONDECYT Iniciación nº 11200050, held by Marcos Alonso. This article is funded by FONDECYT Iniciación nº 11200245, held by Rodrigo Escribano.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Philosophy Department, Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Viña del Mar, Chile

    Marcos Alonso

  2. History Department, Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Viña del Mar, Chile

    Rodrigo Escribano

Authors
  1. Marcos Alonso
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rodrigo Escribano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcos Alonso.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alonso, M., Escribano, R. The Non-identity Problem and «Historical Victims». Philosophia 50, 369–384 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-021-00407-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-021-00407-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation