Skip to main content

The Distinctiveness of the Epistemology of Religious Belief

  • Chapter
The Rationality of Theism

Part of the book series: Studies in Philosophy and Religion ((STPAR,volume 19))

  • 168 Accesses

Abstract

To what extent is the epistemology of religious belief different from the epistemology of other areas of our belief and to what extent is it similar? The use of “to what extent?” is calculated. We cannot expect either exact sameness or complete difference. There will be at least some points of identity, for example terms of epistemic assessment such as “justified,” “warranted,” “rational.”1 And at some level of generality the same standards may apply for the application of these terms. But there will also be some points of difference. Most obviously, differences in content will pose different epistemological problems. Beliefs about the nature and activities of a supreme spiritual being cannot be assessed in exactly the same way as beliefs about my front yard.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alston, William P.: 1991, Perceiving God, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gale, Richard M.: 1991, On the Nature and Existence of God, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, John Henry: 1979, An Essay in Aid of a Grammar of Assent, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plantinga, Alvin: 1983, ‘Reason and Belief in God,’ in: A. Plantinga & N. Wolterstorff (eds.), Faith and Rationality, Univ. of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plantinga, Alvin: forthcoming, Warranted Christian Belief.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santayana, George: 1923, Scepticism and Animal Faith, Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swinburne, Richard: 1979, The Existence of God, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swinburne, Richard: 1992, Revelation: From Metaphor to Analogy, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Alston, W.P. (1999). The Distinctiveness of the Epistemology of Religious Belief. In: Brüntrup, G., Tacelli, R.K. (eds) The Rationality of Theism. Studies in Philosophy and Religion, vol 19. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9289-5_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9289-5_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5268-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9289-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics