Skip to main content
Log in

Biological control and agricultural modernization: Towards resolution of some contradictions

  • Published:
Agriculture and Human Values Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An emergent contradiction in the contemporary development of biological control is that of the prevalence of the substitution of periodic releases of natural enemies for chemical insecticides and the dominance of biotechnologically developed transgenic crops. Input substitution leaves in place the monoculture nature of agroecosystems, which in itself is a key factor in encouraging pest problems. Biotechnology, now under corporate control, creates more dependency and can potentially lead to Bt resistance, thus excluding from the market a key biopesticide. Approaches for putting back biological control into the hands of farmers (from artesanal biotechnology for grassroots biopesticide production Cuban style to farmer-to-farmer IPM networks, etc.) have been developed as a way to create a farmer centered approach to biological control

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altieri, M. A. (1991), “Classical biological control and social equity,” Bulletin of Entomological Research 81: 365–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altieri, M. A. (1993), Crop protection strategies for small farmers. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altieri, M. A. (1994), Biodiversity and pest management in agroecosystems. New York: Haworth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altieri, M. A. (1995), Agroecology: The science of sustainable agriculture. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altieri, M. A., and R. Rosset (1996), “Agroecology and the conversion of large-scale conventional systems to conventional management,” International Journal of Environmental Studies 50: 165–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andow, D. A. (1991), “Vegetational diveristy and arthropod population response,” Annual Review of Entomology 35: 561–568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belloti, A. C., C. Cardona, and S. L. Lapointe (1990), “Trends in pesticide use in Colombia and Brazil,” Journal of Agricultural Entomology 7: 191–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway, G. R., and J. N. Pretty (1991), Unwelcome harvest: Agriculture and pollution. London: Earthscan Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeBach, P. (1964), Biological control of insect pests and weeds. New York: Reihold.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeBach, P., and D. Rosen (1991), Biological control by natural enemies, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Entwistle, P. F. (1993), Bacillus thuringiensis: An environmental biopesticide. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flint, M. L., and P. A. Roberts (1989), “Using crop diversity to manage pest problems: Some California examples,” American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 3: 164–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fry, G. (1995), “Landscape ecology of insect movement in arable ecosystems,” in: Ecology and Integrated Farming Systems. Proceedings of the 13th Long Ashton International Symposium, Bristol, Uk. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, C., and P. Mooney (1990), Shattering: Food, politics, and the loss of genetic diversity. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagen, K. S., and J. M. Franz (1973), “A history of biological control,” in R. F. Smith et al. (eds.), History of entomology (pp. 433–476). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, M. (1987), Escape from the pesticide treadmill.New York: Consumers Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hindmarsh, R. (1991), “The flawed ‘sustainable’ promise of genetic engineering,” The Ecologist 21: 196–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hruska, A. J., and M. L. Pav´ on, eds. (1997), Trangenic plants. Bacillus thuringiensis in Mesoamerican agriculture.Honduras: Zamorano Academic Press.

  • Huffaker, C. B., and P. S. Messenger (1976), Theory and practiceof biological control. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kloppenberg, J., and D. C. Kleinman (1987), “The plant germplasm controversy,” BioScience 37: 190–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laing, J. E., and J. Hamai (1976), “Biological control of insect pests and weeds by imported parasites, predators and pathogens,” in C. B. Huffaker, and P. S. Messenger (eds.), Theory and practice of biological control (pp. 686–744). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lampkin, N. (1990), Organic farming. Ipswich: Farming Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levins, R. (1973), “Fundamental and applied research in agriculture,” Science 181: 523–524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luck, R. F. (1981), “Parasitic insects introduced as biological control agents for arthropod pests,” in D. Pimentel (ed.), Handbook of pest management in agriculture,Vol. II (pp. 125–284). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, D. L. (1994). Cultivating crisis: The human costs of pes-ticides in Latin America. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Academy of Sciences (1972). Genetic vulnerability of major crops. Washington, DC: NAS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Repetto, R. (1985), Paying the price: Pesticide subsidies in developing countries. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rissler, Jr., and M. Mellon (1996), The ecological risks of engineered crops. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosset, P., and M. A. Altieri (1997), “Agroecology versus input substitution: a fundamental contradiction of sustainable agriculture,”Society and Natural Resources (in press).

  • Rosset, P., and M. Benjamin (1994), The greening of the revolution: Cuba's experiment with organic agriculture. Melbourne (Australia): Ocean Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thrupp, L. A. (1996), New partnerships for sustainable agriculture. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Union of Concerned Scientists (1996), “Bt cotton fails to control bollworm,” The Gene Exchange7(1): 1, 8.

  • Van den Bosch, R., P. S. Messenger, and A. P. Gutierrez (1982), An introduction to biological control. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandermeer, J. (1995), “The ecological basis of alternative agriculture,” Annual Review Ecological Systems 26: 201–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Driesche, R. G., and T. S. Bellows (1996), Biological control. New York: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weir, D., and M. Shapiro (1981), Circle of poison. San Francisco: Institute for Food and Development.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Altieri, M.A., Rosset, P.M. & Nicholls, C.I. Biological control and agricultural modernization: Towards resolution of some contradictions. Agriculture and Human Values 14, 303–310 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007499401616

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007499401616

Navigation