Skip to main content
Log in

Canonical Syllogistic Moods in Traditional Aristotelian Logic

  • Published:
Logica Universalis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A novel theoretical formulation of Categorical Logic based on two properties of categorical propositions and three simple axioms has been introduced recently. This formulation allowed for the suppression of the distinction between immediate and mediate inferences, and also provided a theoretical framework to study opposition relations, thus restoring the theoretical unity of traditional Aristotelian logic. By using this approach, it has been reported that a total of 3072 conclusive syllogistic moods can be found when including indefinite terms in classical syllogistic, but this result has yet to be proven. This paper presents an overview of the recently proposed theoretical formulation of Categorical Logic, along with the derivation of the 48 canonical syllogistic moods that are capable of generating the 3072 conclusive moods previously reported.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Correia M.: The Syllogistic Theory of Boethius. Anc. Philos. 29, 391–405 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Alvarez E., Correia M.: Syllogistic with Indefinite Terms. History Philos. Logic 33, 297–306 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Correia, M.: La lógica de Aristóteles. Ediciones Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago de Chile (2003)

  4. Béziau, J.-Y., Gerogiorgakis, S. (eds): New Dimensions of the Square of Opposition. Philosophia Verlag, Munich (2016)

  5. Ross W.D.: Aristotle’s Prior and Posterior Analytics. Clarendom Press, Oxford (1949)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wallis, J.: Institutio logicae. Oxford (1687)

  7. The Logic Museum (2016). http://www.logicmuseum.com/wiki/Syllogism. Accessed on September 2016

  8. Peterson, P.L.: Intermediate Quantifiers: Logic, Linguistics, and Aristotelian Semantics. Ashgate, Aldershot (2000)

  9. Murinová P., Novák V.: A formal theory of generalized intermediate syllogisms. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 186, 47–80 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Murinová P., Novák V.: The structure of generalized intermediate syllogisms. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 247, 18–37 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Murinová P., Novák V.: Analysis of generalized square of opposition with intermediate quantifiers. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 242, 89–113 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Murinová P., Novák V.: Syllogisms and 5-Square of Opposition with Intermediate Quantifiers in Fuzzy Natural Logic. Logica Universalis 10, 339–357 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Peterson P.L.: On the logic of “Few”, “Many” and “Most”. Notre Dame J. Formal Logic 20, 155–179 (1979)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Enrique Alvarez-Fontecilla.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alvarez-Fontecilla, E. Canonical Syllogistic Moods in Traditional Aristotelian Logic. Log. Univers. 10, 517–531 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11787-016-0156-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11787-016-0156-x

Mathematics Subject Classification

Keywords

Navigation