Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A response to critics

  • Published:
Dao Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ames, Roger, and David Hall. 2001.Focusing the Familiar. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, Stephen R.L. 1975.Aristotle’s Man: Speculations Upon Aristotelian Anthropology. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, Eliot. 2002.Persons and Valuable Worlds: A Global Philosophy. Lanham, Md: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, John. 1994.The Moral Writings of John Dewey. Ed. by James Gou-inlock. New York: Prometheus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, A.C. 1989.Disputers of the Tao. La Salle, IL: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie, W.K.C. 1971.The Sophists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, David, and Roger Ames. 1998.Thinking from the Han: Self, Truth, and Transcendence in Chinese and Western Culture. Albany: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerferd, G.B. 1981.The Sophistic Movement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Chenyang. 2004. “Zhongyong as Grand Harmony: An Alternative Reading to Ames and Hall’sFocuing the Familiar.”Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy III.2:173–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Littlejohn, Ronnie. 2004. “The Giant Forge and the Great Ironsmith: Revisiting the Implications ofWu Xing Physics of theZhongyong.”Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy III.2: 205–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J.S. 1965.On the Logic of Moral Sciences. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ni, Peimin. 2002.On Confucius. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • —. 2004. “ReadingZhongyong as aGongfu Instruction: Comments onFocuing the Familiar”Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy III.2: 189–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryle, Gilbert. 1949.The Concept of Mind. London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sim, May. 2004. “Harmony and the Mean in theNicomachean Ethics and theZhongyong”Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy III.2: 253–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sivin, Nathan. 1995.Medicine, Philosophy and Religion in Ancient China: Researches and Reflections. Aldershot, HANTS: Variorum.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2004. “On Some Dimensions of theZhongyong.” Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy III.2: 167–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stichler, Richard. 2004. “Interpreting theZhongyong. Was Confucius a Sophist or an Aristotelian?”Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy III.2: 235–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wen, Haiming. 2004. “From Substance Language to Vocabularies of Process and Change: Translations of Key Philosophical Terms in theZhongyong.”Dao: A journal of Comparative Philosophy III.2: 217–233.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Hawaii, 96822-2303, Honolulu, HW

    Roger T. Ames (Professor of Philosophy)

Authors
  1. Roger T. Ames
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roger T. Ames.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ames, R.T. A response to critics. Dao 3, 281–298 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02856671

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02856671

Keywords

Search

Navigation