Abstract
Government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs) and quasi-autonomous non-governmental organizations (quangos) comprise a powerful organizational sector that has been criticized for its lack of accountability to governments and their citizens. These organizations are established to serve the public as a whole by targeting the needs of particular groups or fulfilling specific functions. Often they use practices adopted from the business sector, and sometimes they enter the marketplace as profit-making enterprises. In light of the contribution of GSE Fannie Mae to the 2008 world economic crisis, the impact of this sector on effective democratic government bears further examination. In this article, I present a systems model that suggests how researchers might comprehensively assess the accountability of organizations in this sector, here termed the “gray sector,” with respect to their government missions. I focus on four systems dimensions: mission, organizational design, organizational outcomes, and the information feedback process. Organizational design and the nature of the sector population are cited as emerging issues of particular importance.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- GSE:
-
Government-sponsored enterprise
- GSO:
-
Gray-sector organization
- Quango:
-
Quasi-autonomous non-governmental organization
References
Allix, M. and S. Van Thiel: 2005, ‘Mapping the Field of Quasi-Autonomous Organizations in France and Italy’, International Public Management Journal 8(1), 39-55.
Anand, V., B. E. Ashforth and M. Joshi: 2004, ‘Business as Usual: The Acceptance and Perpetuation of Corruption in Organizations’, Academy of Management Executive 18, 39-53.
Appelbaum, B., C. D. Leonnig and D. S. Hilzenrath: 2008, ‘How Washington Failed to Rein in Fannie, Freddie; As Profits Grew, Firms Used Their Power to Mask Peril’, Washington Post 14 September, A01.
Ashforth, B., Gioia, D., Robinson, S., & Trevino, L.: 2008, ‘Re-viewing organizational corruption’, Academy of Management Review 33(3), 670-684.
Barker, A. (Ed.): 1982, Quangos in Britain: Government and the Networks of Public Policy-Making, (Macmillan, London).
Barley, S. R.: 2007, ‘Corporations, democracy, and the public good’, Journal of Management Inquiry 16(3), 201-215.
Bertelli, A. M.: 2005, ‘Governing the Quango: An Auditing and Cheating Model of Quasi-Governmental Authorities’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 16 , 239-261.
Bertelli, A.: 2006, ‘The Role of Political Ideology in the Structural Design of New Governance Agencies’, Public Administration Review 66(4), 583-595.
Birrell, D.: 2008, ‘Devolution and Quangos in the United Kingdom: The Implementation of Principles and Policies for Rationalisation and Democratisation’, Policy Studies 29(1), 35-49.
Bleemer, R.: 1994, ‘Court Strips Agencies of Federal Suit Immunity’, New Jersey Law Journal November 21, 7.
Bochel, C. and H. Bochel: 2004, The UK Social Policy Process (Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke).
Bohte, J. and K. J. Meier: 2000, ‘Goal Displacement: Assessing the Motivation for Organizational Cheating’, Public Administration Review 60(2), 173-182.
Booker, A.: 1999, ‘Balancing the Scales – The Growth, Role and Future of the Regulators’, in M. V. Flinders and M. J. Smith (eds.), Quangos, Accountability and Reform, (St. Martin’s Press, NY), 180-190.
Bozeman, B.: 1987. All Organizations are Public, (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco).
Bradshaw, P.: 2009, ‘A Contingency Approach to Nonprofit Governance’, Nonprofit Management and Leadership 20(1), 61-81.
Bumgarner, J. and C. B. Newswander: 2009, ‘The Irony of NPM: The Inevitable Extension of the Role of the American State’, The American Review of Public Administration 39(2), 189-207.
Burns, T. and G. M. Stalker: 1961, The Management of Innovation, (Tavistock, London).
Burton, R. M. and B. Obel: 1998, Strategic Organizational Diagnosis and Design (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA).
Connor, P. E.: 1980, Organizations: Theory and Design, (Science Research Associates, Chicago, IL).
Democratic Audit Human Rights Center: 2009, ‘Quangos and Quangocrats’, http://www.democraticaudit.com/issues/quangos.php. Accessed 24 March.
Donlan, T. G.: 2009, ‘Engines of Destruction: Following the Impulse that led Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to Disaster’, Barron’s, December 21, 51.
Easton, B.: 1997, The Commercialization of New Zealand, (Auckland University Press, Auckland).
Ermann, M. D. and R. J. Lundman: 2002, Corporate and Governmental Deviance, 3rd edition (Oxford University Press, NY).
Ewing, David W.: 1978, Freedom inside the Organization: Bringing Civil Liberties to the Workplace, (McGraw-Hill, NY).
Federal Housing Enterprise Financial Safety and Soundness Act of 1992: 1992, U.S. Code, Title 12, Chapter 46. Government Sponsored Enterprises.
Flinders, M. V. and H. McConnel: 1999, ‘Diversity and Complexity: The Quango-Continuum’, in M. V. Flinders and M. J. Smith (eds.), Quangos, Accountability and Reform, (St. Martin’s Press, NY), 17-25.
Flinders, M. V. and M. J. Smith: 1999, ‘Realizing the Democratic Potential of Quangos’, in M. V. Flinders and M. J. Smith (eds.), Quangos, Accountability and Reform, (St. Martin’s Press, NY), 201-210.
Frederickson HG (2004) Shall We Quango. PA Times 27(1):11.
Gilb, C. L.: 1981, ‘Public or Private Governments’, in P. C. Nystrom and W. H. Starbuck (eds.), Handbook of Organizational Design, (Oxford University Press, NY), 464-491.
Greve, C.: 1995, ‘Den grå zone’, Project on Public Sector – Condition and Future. Projekt Offentlig Sektor/Vilkar og Fremtid, Copenhagen.
Greve, C.: 1999, ‘Quangos in Denmark and Scandinavia: Trends, Problems and Perspectives’, in M. V. Flinders and M. J. Smith (eds.), Quangos, Accountability, and Reform: The Politics of Quasi-government, (Macmillan Press, Basingstoke, UK), 83-108.
Greve, C., M. Flinders, and S. Van Thiel: 1999, ‘Quangos – What’s in a Name? Defining Quangos From a Comparative Perspective’, Governance 12, 129-146.
Hall, W. and S. Weir: 1996, The Untouchables: Power and Accountability in the Quango State. Democratic Audit Paper 8, The Scarman Trust, London.
Heidenheimer, A. J. (Ed.): 1978, Political Corruption: Readings in Comparative Analysis, (Transaction Books, New Brunswick, NJ).
Herman, R. D. and Renz, D. O.: 2009, ‘Advancing Nonprofit Organizational Effectiveness Research and Theory’, Nonprofit Management & Leadership 18(4), 399-415.
Hilzenrath, D. S. and C. Johnson: 2006, ‘Fannie Mae Avoids Criminal Charges Over Accounting’, The Washington Post August 25, D01.
Hogan, W. P.: 1983, ‘Government and Business Links’, in G. R. Curnow and C. A. Saunders (eds.), Quangos: The Australian Experience, (Hale and Iremonger, Sydney), 53-72.
Hogarty, R. A.: 2002, ‘The Paradox of Public Authorities in Massachusetts: Massport and Masspike’, New England Journal of Public Policy, 17, 19-37.
Horowitz, J.: 2004, ‘NYSE Had Loss of $1.6 Million in Third Quarter’, Dow Jones News Wires, November 23. Accessed 1 December 2004.
House of Commons: 1998, ‘An Examination of the Accountability of Public Bodies Through a Comparative Perspective’, Public Administration, Memorandum 43, March. (Parliament, UK).
James, D.: 2004, ‘Politics Without Profit’, BRW 26(6), February 19, 22.
Johnston, M.: 1982, Political Corruption and Public Policy in America, (Brooks-Cole, Monterey, CA).
Johnston, M.: 1987, ‘Right and Wrong in American Politics: Popular Conceptions of Corruption’, in A. J. Heidenheimer, M. Johnston, and V.T. LeVine (eds.), Political Corruption: A Handbook, (Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, NJ), 743-761.
Joldersma, C. and V. Winter: 2002, ‘Strategic Management in Hybrid Organizations’, Public Management Review 4, 83-99.
Jones, A.: 2001, ‘Social Responsibility and the Utilities’, Journal of Business Ethics, 34, 219-229.
Kopecki, D.: 2004, ‘Sallie Mae Completes Privatization 4 Years Early’, Wall Street Journal December 30, C3.
Koppell, J. G. S.: 2001, ‘Hybrid Organizations and the Alignment of Interests: The Case of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac’, Public Administration Review 61, 468-482.
Koppell, J. G. S.: 2003, The Politics of Quasi-Government: Hybrid Organizations and the Dynamics of Bureaucratic Control, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
Labaton, S.: 2004, ‘Directors of Fannie Mae to Discuss Executives’ Fates’, New York Times, December 18. nytimes.com. Accessed 24 March 2009.
Labaton, S. and Andrews, E. L.: 2008, ‘In Rescue to Stabilize Lending, U.S. Takes Over Mortgage Finance Titans’, New York Times, September 7, http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/08/business/08fannie.html?_r=1. Accessed 8 May 2009.
Landers, B.: 1999, ‘Of Ministers, Mandarins and Managers’, in M. V. Flinders and M. J. Smith (eds.), Quangos, Accountability and Reform, (St. Martin’s Press, NY), 120-131.
Lenihan, J. M., M. T. P. Weed, M. A. Cote, D. DaPonte, J. Patterson, M. A. Parella, and L. P. Raptakis: 2000, Senate Select Commission on Quasi-Public Agencies. Report to the Rhode Island State Senate, December.
Lowery, D.: 2003, ‘Quangos: Trends, Causes and Consequences (Book)’. Public Management Review 5, 299-303.
Marcusson, L. and O. Petterson: 1990, ‘Orienteringspunikter in den grå zonen’, Nordisk Administrativt Tidsskrift 71.
Messner, M.: 2009, ‘The Limits of Accountability’, Accounting, Organizations and Society 34, 918-938.
Moe, R. C.: 1979, ‘Government Corporations and the Erosion of Accountability: The Case of the Proposed Energy Security Corporation’, Public Administration Review 39, 566-571.
Moe, R. C.: 2001, ‘The Emerging Federal Quasi Government: Issues of Management and Accountability’, Public Administration Review 61, 290-312.
Moe, R. C. and K. R. Kosar: 2005, ‘The Quasi Government: Hybrid Organizations with Both Government and Private Sector Legal Characteristics’, Congressional Research Service, The Library of Congress, May 18.
Morgan, G.: 1989, Creative Organization Theory: A Resource Book (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).
Morgan, K.: 2004, ‘Debate Lost in Bonfire Heat’, Agenda Institute of Welsh Affairs, Autumn 20–23.
Musolf, L. D. and H. Seidman: 1980, ‘The Blurred Boundaries of Public Administration’, Public Administration Review 40, 124-130.
Nasrallah, W. F., and S. J. Qawasmeh: 2009, ‘Comparing Multi-dimensional Contingency Fit to Financial Performance of Organizations,’ European Journal of Operational Research 194(3), 911-921.
O’ Brien, T.: 2009, ‘Reconsidering the Common Good in a Business Context’, Journal of Business Ethics 85, 25-37.
O’Neill, O.: 2002. A Question of Trust, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
Oder, N.: 2004, ‘When LSSI Comes to Town – Public Libraries, Private Company: The Outsourcing Compromise’, Library Journal, October 1. www.libraryjournal.com. Accessed 24 March 2009.
Pearce, J. L.: 2001, Organization and Management in the Embrace of Government, (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ).
Perrow, C.: 1976, ‘A Framework for the Comparative Analysis of Organizations’, American Sociological Review 32, 194–208.
Perry, J. and H. G. Rainey: 1988, ‘The Public-Private Distinction in Organizational Theory’, Academy of Management Review 13, 182-201.
Purssell, A.: 1999, ‘Local Government and the Unelected State’, in M. V. Flinders and M. J. Smith (eds.), Quangos, Accountability and Reform, (St. Martin’s Press, NY), 132-143.
Rassmussen, K., D. Malloy, and J. Agarwal: 2003, ‘The Ethical Climate of Government and Non-Profit Organizations’, Public Management Review 5, 83-97.
Roberts, J.: 2009, ‘No One is Perfect: The Limits of Transparency and an Ethic for ‘Intelligent’ Accountability’, Accounting, Organizations and Society 34, 957-970.
Schaffer, B.: 1958, ‘The Distinction Between Executive and Administrative Work’, Public Administration 10, 112-118.
Scottish Executive: 2001, ‘Public Bodies: Proposals for Change’, Scottish Executive, Edinburgh [as referenced in Birrell (2008), no pages].
Seidman, H.: 1975, ‘Government-sponsored Enterprise in the United States’, in B. L. R. Smith (ed.) The New Political Economy: The Public Use of the Private Sector, (John Wiley & Sons, NY), 83-108.
Sen, A.: 2003, Democratic Management: The Path to Total Quality with Total Liberty and Equality, (University Press of America, Lanham, MD).
Sills, D. L.: 1970, ‘Preserving Organizational Goals’, in O. Grusky and G. A. Miller (eds.), The Sociology of Organizations, (Free Press, New York NY), 227-236.
Skelcher, C.: 1998, The Appointed State: Quasi-Governmental Organizations and Democracy, (Open University Press, Buckingham, U.K.).
Stanton, T. H.: 2002, Government-Sponsored Enterprises: Mercantilist Companies in the Modern World, (AEI Press, Washington D.C.).
Stillman, R.: 1987: The American Bureaucracy (Nelson-Hall, Chicago).
Theobold, R.: 2002, ‘Can the State Deliver?’, New Political Economy 7, 435-441.
Van Ooosterhout, J.: 2006, ‘Authority and Democracy in Corporate Governance’, Journal of Business Ethics 71, 359-370.
Van Thiel, S.: 2001, Quangos: Trends, Causes and Consequences, (Ashgate Publishing Limited, Aldershot, England).
Velez-Saez, J.: 1951, ‘The Doctrine of the Common Good of Civil Society in the Works of Thomas Aquinas’, (Department of Philosophy, Notre Dame, IN).
Wertheimer, L.: 2008, ‘Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae Face Tough Times’, National Public Radio, July 12, http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=92489068. Accessed 8 May 2009.
Wettenhall, R. L.: 1983, ‘Quangos, Quagos and the Problems of Non-Ministerial Government’, in G. R. Curnow and C. A. Saunders (eds.), Quangos: The Australian Experience, (Hale and Iremonger, Sydney), 5-52.
Ziemer, D.: 2004, ‘Quasi-Public Corporations are Subject to WARN Act’, Wisconsin Law Journal March 17, News Section.
Acknowledgments
The author wishes to thank Carl W. Nelson and several anonymous reviewers for their comments on earlier versions of this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
André, R. Assessing the Accountability of Government-Sponsored Enterprises and Quangos. J Bus Ethics 97, 271–289 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0509-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0509-y