Skip to main content
Log in

Educational Theory as a Writerly Practice

  • Published:
Studies in Philosophy and Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Educational theory does not oppose educational practice, as manyseem to think; instead it is a form of practice and the action oftheory exists at two levels. At a cultural level theory ischaracterized by linguistic forms of action and at a social level it is characterized by the day to day practices thatorganize and reward the work of producing educational philosophy.While the social practices that govern the production ofphilosophy certainly beg for ethnographic attention,any consideration anthropologists or philosophers giveit will eventually find its way to the page and hence tothe cultural forms of linguistic action that are thesubject of this paper. Focusing on how educationalphilosophers see the things that they do, as opposedto what they see, I will suggest that the wayeducational philosophy is fashioned is an importantpart of what is fashioned. Ironically, as I will show,the ``way'' of educational philosophy can flow with oragainst the ``what'' of it – an author, that is, can saythat they are for or against this or that, but their stylized way of saying it can contradict the literalmeaning of their words.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Bakitin, M. (1984). Rabelais and his world. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, K. (1959). Attitudes toward history, 2nd edn. Los Altos, CA: Hermes Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1966). Democracy and education. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M. (1966). Purity and danger: An analysis of the concepts of pollution and taboo. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fish, S. (1989). Doing what comes naturally: Change, rhetoric, and the practice of theory in literary and legal studies. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fish, S. (1999). The trouble with principle. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frye, N. (1976). The secular scripture: A study of the structure of romance. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, C. (2000). Available light: Anthropological reflections on philosophical topics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, H.A. (1996). Fugitive cultures: Race, violence and youth. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graff, G. (1992). Teaching the conflicts. In D.J. Bless & B.H. Smith (eds), The politics of liberal education. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langer, S. (1942). Philosophy in a new key: A study in the symbolism of reason, rite, and art. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stallybrass, P. & White, A. (1986). The politics and poetics of transgression. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Anderson, H. Educational Theory as a Writerly Practice. Studies in Philosophy and Education 21, 219–228 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015555108208

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015555108208

Navigation