Skip to main content
Log in

The human genome project: a reply to Rosenberg

  • Published:
Biology and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we discuss the scientific value of the human genome project. To what extent is the data obtained by sequencing the entire human genome useful in the gene dicovery process? Responding to Alex Rosenberg' skepticism about the value of such data, we maintain that brute sequence data is much more useful than he suggests.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Grinnell F. 2000. Philosophy of Biology and the Human Genome Project. Biology and Philosophy 15: 595–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reese M.G. and Hartzell G. et al. 2000. Genome Annotation Assessment in Drosophila Melanogaster. Genome Research 10: 483–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg A. 2001. Careless Reading About the Human Genome Project. Biology and Philosophy 16: 281–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg A. 1996. “The Human Genome Project Research Tactics and Economic Strategies” Social Philosophy and Policy, 13: 1–17. Reprinted in Hull D. and Ruse M. (eds), Philosophy of BiologyVol. 13. Oxford University Press, New York 1998, 567-586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robin O. Andreasen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Andreasen, R.O., Aukerman, M.J. The human genome project: a reply to Rosenberg. Biology & Philosophy 17, 673–678 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022555825234

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022555825234

Navigation