Abstract
In this paper we discuss the scientific value of the human genome project. To what extent is the data obtained by sequencing the entire human genome useful in the gene dicovery process? Responding to Alex Rosenberg' skepticism about the value of such data, we maintain that brute sequence data is much more useful than he suggests.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Grinnell F. 2000. Philosophy of Biology and the Human Genome Project. Biology and Philosophy 15: 595–601.
Reese M.G. and Hartzell G. et al. 2000. Genome Annotation Assessment in Drosophila Melanogaster. Genome Research 10: 483–501.
Rosenberg A. 2001. Careless Reading About the Human Genome Project. Biology and Philosophy 16: 281–284.
Rosenberg A. 1996. “The Human Genome Project Research Tactics and Economic Strategies” Social Philosophy and Policy, 13: 1–17. Reprinted in Hull D. and Ruse M. (eds), Philosophy of BiologyVol. 13. Oxford University Press, New York 1998, 567-586.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Andreasen, R.O., Aukerman, M.J. The human genome project: a reply to Rosenberg. Biology & Philosophy 17, 673–678 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022555825234
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022555825234