Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Ontogeny, Genetics, and Evolution: A Perspective from Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience

  • Published:
Biological Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study of genetic developmental disorders originally seemed to hold the promise for those of a nativist persuasion of demonstrating pure dissociations between different cognitive functions, as well as the existence of innately specified modules in the brain and the direct mapping of mutated genes to specific cognitive-level outcomes. However, more recent research within a neuroconstructivist perspective has challenged this promise, arguing that earlier researchers lost sight of one fundamental explanatory factor in both the typical and atypical case: the actual process of ontogenetic development. The paper is divided into three parts on evolution, genetics, and ontogeny. Each section starts by examining nativist claims about innateness and modularity of function, and subsequently evaluates them within a neuroconstructivist approach to human development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alcock KJ, Passingham RE, Watkins K, Vargha-Khadem F (2000) Pitch and timing abilities in inherited speech and language impairment. Brain and Language 75: 34–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barkow JH, Cosmides L, Tooby J, eds (1992) The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron-Cohen S (1998) Modularity in developmental cognitive neuropsychology: Evidence from autism and Gilles de la Tourette syndrome. In: Handbook of Mental Retardation and Development (Burack JA, Hodapp RM, Zigler E, eds), 334–348. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates E, Roe K (2001) Language development in children with unilateral brain injury. In: Handbook of Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience (Nelson CA, Luciana M, eds), 281–307. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellugi U, Wang P, Jernigan TL (1994) Williams syndrome: An unusual neuropsychological profile. In: Atypical Cognitive Deficits in Developmental Disorders: Implications for Brain Function (Broman S, Grafman J, eds), 23–56. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benasich AA, Spitz RV (1999) Insights from infants: Temporal processing abilities and genetics contribute to language impairment. In: A Neurode-velopmental Approach to Specific Learning Disorders (Whitmore K, Hart H, Willems G, eds), 191–210. London: Mac Keith Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop DVM (1997) Uncommon Understanding: Development and Disorders of Language Comprehension in Children. Hove: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Botha R (2004) Windows with a view on language evolution. European Review 12: 235–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Botting N (2005) Non-verbal cognitive development and language impairment. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 46: 317–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown J, Johnson MH, Paterson S, Gilmore RO, Gsödl M, Longhi E, Karmiloff-Smith A (2003) Spatial representation and attention in toddlers with Williams syndrome and Down syndrome. Neuropsychologia 41: 1037–1046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiat S (2001) Mapping theories of developmental language impairment: Premises, predictions and evidence. Language and Cognitive Processes 16: 113–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciccetti D, Tucker D. (1994) Development and self-regulatory structures of the mind. Development and Psychopathology 6: 533–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clahsen H, Almazan M (1998) Syntax and morphology in Williams syndrome. Cognition 68: 167–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curran ME, Atkinson DL, Ewart AK, Morris CA, Leppert MF, Keating MT (1993) The elastin gene is disrupted by a translocation associated with supravalvular aortic stenosis. Cell 73: 159–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deruelle C, Mancini J, Livet MO, Cassé-Perrot C, de Schonen S (1999) Configural and local face processing in children with Williams syndrome. Brain and Cognition 41: 276–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donnai D, Karmiloff-Smith A (2000) Williams syndrome: From genotype through to the cognitive phenotype. American Journal of Medical Genetics: Seminars in Medical Genetics 97: 164–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elman JL, Bates EA, Johnson MH, Karmiloff-Smith A, Parisi D, Plunkett K (1996) Rethinking Innateness: A Connectionist Perspective on Development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enard W, Przeworski M, Fisher S, Lai CSL, Wiebe V, Kitano T, Monaco AP, Päabo S (2002) Molecular evolution of FOXP2, a gene involved in speech and language. Nature 418: 869–872.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farah MJ, Levinson KL, Klein KL (1995) Face perception and within-category discrimination in prosopagnosia. Neuropsychologia 33: 661–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher SE, Vargha-Khadem F, Watkins KE, Monaco AP, Pembrey ME (1998) Localisation of a gene implicated in a severe speech and language disorder. Nature Genetics 18: 168–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frangiskakis JM, Ewart AK, Morris CA, Mervis CB, Bertrand J, Robinson BF, Klein BP, Ensing GJ, Everett LA, Green ED, Proschel C, Cutowski NJ, Noble M, Atkinson DL, Odelberg SJ, Keating MT (1996) LIM-kinase 1 hemizygosity implicated in impaired visuospatial constructive cognition. Cell 86: 59–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frith U (1995) Dyslexia: Can we have a shared theoretical framework? Educational and Child Psychology 12: 6–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gopnik M, Crago MB (1991) Familial aggregation of a developmental language disorder. Cognition 39: 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant J, Karmiloff-Smith A, Gathercole SA, Paterson S, Howlin P, Davies M, Udwin O (1997) Phonological short-term memory and its relationship to language in Williams syndrome. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry 2: 81–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant J, Valian V, Karmiloff-Smith A (2002) A study of relative clauses in Williams syndrome. Journal of Child Language 29: 403–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray V, Karmiloff-Smith A, Furnell E, Tassabehji M (in press) In-depth analysis of spatial cognition in williams syndrome: A critical assessment of the role of the LIMK1 gene. Neuropsychologia.

  • Grice SJ, de Haan M, Halit H, Johnson MH, Csibra G, Grant J, Karmiloff-Smith A (2003) ERP abnormalities of visual perception in Williams syndrome. NeuroReport 14: 1773–1777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grice S, Spratling MW, Karmiloff-Smith A, Halit H, Csibra G, de Haan M, Johnson MH (2001) Disordered visual processing and oscillatory brain activity in autism and Williams syndrome. NeuroReport 12: 2697–2700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grodzinsky Y (2000) The neurology of syntax: Language use without Broca’s area. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23: 1–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haesler S, Wada K, Nshdejan A, Morrisey EE, Lints T, Jarvis ED, Scharff C (2004) FoxP2 expression in avian vocal learners and non-learners. Journal of Neuroscience 24: 3164–3175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurford JR, Studdert-Kennedy M, Knight C, eds (1998) Approaches to the Evolution of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huttenlocher PR (2002) Neural Plasticity: The Effects of Environment on the Development of the Cerebral Cortex. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarrold C, Hartley SJ, Phillips C, Baddeley AD (2000) Word fluency in Williams syndrome: Evidence for unusual semantic organisation? Cognitive Neuropsychiatry 5: 293–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson MH (2001) Functional brain development in humans. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2: 475–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karmiloff-Smith A (1992) Beyond Modularity: A Developmental Perspective on Cognitive Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karmiloff-Smith A (1998) Development itself is the key to understanding developmental disorders. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2: 389–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karmiloff-Smith A, Grant J, Berthoud I, Davies M, Howlin P, Udwin O (1997) Language and Williams syndrome: How intact is “intact”? Child Development 68: 246–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karmiloff-Smith A, Grant J, Ewing S, Carette MJ, Metcalfe K, Donnai D, Read AP, Tassabehji M (2003) Using case study comparisons to explore genotype/phenotype correlations. Journal of American Medical Genetics 40: 136–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karmiloff-Smith A, Scerif G, Ansari D (2003) Double dissociations in developmental disorders? Theoretically misconceived, empirically dubious. Cortex 39: 161–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karmiloff-Smith A, Scerif G, Thomas MSC (2002)Differentapproaches torelating genotype to phenotype in developmental disorders. Developmental Psychobiology 40: 311–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karmiloff-Smith A, Thomas M (2005) Can developmental disorders be used to bolster claims from evolutionary psychology? A neuroconstructivist approach. In: Biology and Knowledge Revisited: From Neurogenesis to Psychogenesis (Taylor Parker S, Langer J, Milbrath C, eds), 307–321. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karmiloff-Smith A, Thomas M, Annaz D, Humphreys K, Ewing S, Brace N, van Duuren M, Pike G, Grice S, Campbell R (2004) Exploring the Williams syndrome face processing debate: The importance of building developmental trajectories. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 45: 1258–1274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kress T, Daum I (2003) Developmental prosopagnosia: A review. Behavioral Neurology 14: 109–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai CSL, Fisher SE, Hurst JA, Vargha-Khadem F, Monaco A (2001) A forkhead-domain gene is mutated in a severe speech and language disorder. Nature 413: 519–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laing E, Butterworth G, Ansari D, Gsödl M, Longhi E, Panagiotaki G, Paterson S, Karmiloff-Smith A (2002) Atypical development of language and social communication in toddlers with Williams syndrome. Developmental Science 5: 233–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laws G, Bishop DVM (2004) Pragmatic language impairment and social deficits in Williams syndrome: A comparison with Down’s syndrome and specific language impairment. International Journal of Language Communication Disorders 39: 45–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leslie AM (1992) Pretence, autism, and the theory-of-mind-module. Current Directions in Psychological Science 1: 18–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meng Y, Zhang Y, Tregoubov V, Janus C, Cruz L, Jackson M, Lu W-Y, MacDonald JF, Wang JY, Falls DL, Jia Z (2002) Abnormal spine morphology and enhanced LTP in LIMK-1 knockout mice. Neuron 35: 121–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mervis CB, Robinson BF, Bertraud J, Morris CA, Klein-Tasman BP, Armstrong SC (2000) The Williams syndrome cognitive profile. Brain and Cognition 44: 604–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mervis C, Bertrand J (1997) Developmental relations between cognition and language: Evidence from Williams syndrome. In: Research on Communication and Language Disorders: Contributions to Theories of Language Development (Adamson LB, Romski MA, eds), 75–106. New York: Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miozzo M (2003) On the processing of regular and irregular forms of verbs and nouns: Evidence from neuropsychology. Cognition 87: 101–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munakata Y, Johnson MH (in press) Attention and performance XXI: Processes of change in brain and cognitive development.

  • Nazzi T, Gopnik A, Karmiloff-Smith A (2005) Asynchrony in the cognitive and lexical development of young children with Williams syndrome. Journal of Child Language 32: 427–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nazzi T, Karmiloff-Smith A (2002) Early categorization abilities in young children with Williams syndrome. NeuroReport 13: 1259–1262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nazzi T, Paterson S, Karmiloff-Smith A (2003) Early word segmentation by infants and toddlers with Williams syndrome. Infancy 4: 251–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neville HJ, Mills DL, Bellugi U (1994) Effects of altered auditory sensitivity and age of language acquisition on the development of language-relevant neural systems: Preliminary studies of Williams syndrome. In: Atypical Cognitive Deficits in developmental disorders: Implications for Brain Function (Broman S, Grafman J, eds), 67–83. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newmeyer FJ (2004) Cognitive and functional factors in the evolution of grammar. European Review 12: 245–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norbury CF, Bishop DVM, Biscoe J (in press) Does impaired grammatical comprehension provide evidence for an innate grammar module? Applied Psycholinguistics.

  • Nunn JA, Postma P, Pearson R (2001) Developmental prosopagnosia: Should it be taken at face value? Neurocase 7: 15–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paterson SJ, Brown JH, Gsödl MK, Johnson MH, Karmiloff-Smith A (1999) Cognitive modularity and genetic disorders. Science 286: 2355–2358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinker S (1994) The Language Instinct. London: Penguin.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pinker S (1997) How the Mind Works. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinker S (1999) Words and Rules. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinker S (2001) Talk of genetics and vice-versa. Nature 413: 465–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proschel C, Blouin MJ, Gutowski NJ, Ludwig R, Noble M (1995) L1MK1 is predominantly expressed in neural tissue and phosphorylates serine, threonine and tyrosine residues in vitro. Oncogene 11: 1271–1281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapp A, Caramazza A (2002) Selective difficulties with spoken nouns and written verbs: A single case study. Journal of Neurolinguistics 15: 373–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice ML (2002) A unified model of specific and general language delay: Grammatical tense as a clinical marker of unexpected variation. In: Language Competence Across Populations: Toward a Definition of Specific Language Impairment (Levy Y, Schaeffer J, eds), 63–95. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossen ML, Jones W, Wang PP, Klima ES (1995) Face processing: Remarkable sparing in Williams syndrome. Genetic Counseling 6: 138–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossen M, Klima ES, Bellugi U, Bihrle A, Jones W (1996) Interaction between language and cognition: Evidence from Williams syndrome. In: Language Learning and Behaviour (Beitchman JH, Cohen N, Konstantareas M, Tannock R, eds), 367–392. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer Harris NG, Bellugi U, Bates E, Jones W, Rossen M (1997) Contrasting profiles of language development in children with Williams and Down syndromes. Developmental Neuropsychology 13: 345–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith N, Tsimpli IM (1995) The Mind of a Savant: Language, Learning and Modularity. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tager-Flusberg H, Boshart J, Baron-Cohen S (1998) Reading the windows to the soul: Evidence of domain-specific sparing in Williams syndrome. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 10: 631–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tager-Flusberg H, Plesa-Skwerer D, Faja S, Joseph RM (2003) People with Williams syndrome process faces holistically. Cognition 89: 11–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tassabehji M, Metcalfe K, Fergusson WD, Carette MJ, Dore JK, Donnai D, Read AP, Proschel C, Gutowski NJ, Mao X, Sheer D (1996) LIM-kinase deleted in Williams syndrome. Nature Genetics 13: 272–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tassabehji M, Metcalfe K, Karmiloff-Smith A, Carette MJ, Grant J, Dennis N, Reardon W, Splitt M, Read AP, Donnai D (1999) Williams syndrome: Use of chromosomal microdeletions as a tool to dissect cognitive and physical phenotypes. American Journal of Human Genetics 63: 118–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Temple C (1997) Developmental Cognitive Neuropsychology. Hove: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Temple C, Almazan M, Sherwood S (2002) Lexical skills in Williams syndrome: A cognitive neuropsychological analysis. Journal of Neurolinguistics 15: 463–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas MSC, Grant J, Gsödl M, Laing E, Barham Z, Lakusta L, Tyler LK, Grice S, Paterson S, Karmiloff-Smith A (2001) Past tense formation in Williams syndrome. Language and Cognitive Processes 16: 143–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Udwin O, Yule W (1991) A cognitive and behavioural phenotype in Williams syndrome. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 13: 232–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Lely HKJ (1997) Language and cognitive development in a grammatical SLI boy: Modularity and innateness. Journal of Neurolinguistics 10: 75–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vargha-Khadem F, Watkins KE, Price CJ, Ashburner J, Alcock K, Gadian DG, Passingham R (1998) Neural basis of an inherited speech and language disorder. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 95: 12695–12700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volterra V, Capirci O, Caselli MC (2001) What atypical populations can reveal about language development: The contrast between deafness and Williams syndrome. Language and Cognitive Processes 16: 219–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wexler K (1996) The development of inflection in a biologically based theory of language acquisition. In: Toward a Genetics of Language (Rice ML, ed), 113–144. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Neurocognitive Development Unit Institute of Child Health, University College London, UK

    Annette Karmiloff-Smith

Authors
  1. Annette Karmiloff-Smith
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Annette Karmiloff-Smith.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Karmiloff-Smith, A. Ontogeny, Genetics, and Evolution: A Perspective from Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience. Biol Theory 1, 44–51 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1162/biot.2006.1.1.44

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/biot.2006.1.1.44

Keywords

Search

Navigation