Abstract
In the eleventh book of the Confessiones Augustine puts forward several considerations about the nature of time. The received view is that he held that only the present exists, while the past and the future do not exist. This received view has recently been attacked by Paul Helm and Katherin Rogers, who have offered alternative interpretations according to which Augustine held that the present has no privileged ontological status, and that past, present and future all equally exist. The aim of this paper is to defend the received view vis-à-vis these attacks. I argue that the received view fits best Augustine’s view of God’s eternity and relation to time and should therefore be preferred.
Bettetini, M. 2001 “Measuring in Accordance with dimensiones certae. Augustine of Hippo and the Question of Time”. In The Medieval Concept of Time: Studies on the Scholastic Debate and its Reception in Early Modern Philosophy. Ed. P. Porro. Leiden, 33–53.10.1163/9789004453197_004Search in Google Scholar
Berti, E. 2007. In principio era la meraviglia: le grandi questioni della filosofia antica. Roma/Bari.Search in Google Scholar
Brown, P. 2000. Augustine of Hyppo: A Biography (update of 1967 edition). Berkeley.Search in Google Scholar
Carter, J. W. 2011. “St. Augustine on Time, Time Numbers, and Enduring Objects”. Vivarium 49(4), 301–323. doi: 10.1163/156853411X606374.10.1163/156853411X606374Search in Google Scholar
Costa, D. 2017. “The Limit Decision Problem and Four-Dimensionalism”. Vivarium 55(1–3), 199–216.10.1163/15685349-12341339Search in Google Scholar
–. 2020. “Was Bonaventure a Four-Dimensionalist?”. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 28(2), 393–404.10.1080/09608788.2019.1641468Search in Google Scholar
Craig, W. L. 1983. “Augustine on Foreknowledge and Free Will”. Augustinian Studies 15, 41–63. doi: 10.5840/augstudies1984152.10.5840/augstudies1984152Search in Google Scholar
Cross, R. 1997. “Duns Scotus on Eternity and Timelessness”. Faith and Philosophy 14(1), 3–25.10.5840/faithphil19971414Search in Google Scholar
–. 1999. “Four-Dimensionalism and Identity Across Time: Henry of Ghent vs Bonaventure”. Journal of the History of Philosophy 37(3), 393–414.10.1353/hph.2008.0927Search in Google Scholar
Flasch, K. 1993. Was ist Zeit? Augustinus von Hippo, das XI. Buch der Confessiones, historisch-philosophische Studie: Text, Übersetzung, Kommentar. Frankfurt/M.10.5771/9783465142638Search in Google Scholar
Fox, R. 2006. Time and Eternity in Mid-Thirteenth-Century Thought. Oxford.10.1093/0199285756.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Guitton, J. 1959. Le temps et l’éternité chez Plotin et Saint Augustin (update of 1933 edition). Paris.Search in Google Scholar
Hardie, R. P./Gaye, R. K. (trans.) 1930. Aristotle Physics. Oxford.Search in Google Scholar
Helm, P. 2014. “Thinking Eternally”. In Augustine’s Confessions: Philosophy in Autobiography. Ed. W. E. Mann. Oxford, 135–54.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199577552.003.0007Search in Google Scholar
Henricus de Gandavo. 1994. Quodlibet III, Quaestio XI: “Utrum tempus possit esse sine anima”. In Aristoteles Contra Augustinum: zur Frage nach dem Verhältnis von Zeit und Seele bei der antiken Aristoteleskommentatoren im arabischen Aristotelismus und im 13. Jahrhundert. Ed. U. R. Jeck. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, 461–476.Search in Google Scholar
Iohannes Scotus Eriugena. 1996. Periphyseon. Liber Primus. Ed. E. Jeauneau. Turnhout.Search in Google Scholar
Kenny, A. 1979. The God of The Philosophers. Oxford.Search in Google Scholar
–. 2005. A New History of Western Philosophy: Medieval Philosophy. Oxford.Search in Google Scholar
Knuuttila, S. 2001. “Time and Creation in Augustine”. In The Cambridge Companion to Augustine. Ed. E. Stump/N. Kretzmann. Cambridge, 103–115.10.1017/CCOL0521650186.009Search in Google Scholar
Leftow, B. 2009. “Anselmian Presentism”. Faith and Philosophy 26(3), 297–319. doi: 10.5840/faithphil200926316.10.5840/faithphil200926316Search in Google Scholar
Marmorale, V. (ed.) 1935. Cicerone Lucullus. Milan.Search in Google Scholar
Mellor, H. 1998. Real Time II. London.10.4324/9780203302675Search in Google Scholar
Mullins, R. T. 2016. The End of the Timeless God. Oxford.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198755180.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Oaklander, L. N. 2004. The Ontology of Time. New York.Search in Google Scholar
Pasnau, R. 2011a. Metaphysical Themes 1274–1671. Oxford.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199567911.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
–. 2011b. “On Existing all at Once”. In God, Eternity, and Time. Ed. C. Tapp/E. Runggaldier. Farnham, 11–28.Search in Google Scholar
Porro, P. 1996. Forme e modelli di durata nel pensiero medievale: l’aevum, il tempo discreto, la categoria Quando. Leuven.Search in Google Scholar
–. 2002. “Il vocabolario filosofico medievale del tempo e della durata.” In Il tempo nel Medioevo. Rappresentazioni storiche e concezioni filosofiche. Ed. R. Capasso/P. Piccari. Società Italiana di Demodossolagia, 73–102.Search in Google Scholar
Rogers, K. 1994. “Eternity has no Duration”. Religious Studies 30(1), 1–16. doi: 10.1017/S003441250002268X.10.1017/S003441250002268XSearch in Google Scholar
–. 1996. “St. Augustine on Time and Eternity”. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 70(2), 207–23. doi: 10.5840/acpq19967026.10.5840/acpq19967026Search in Google Scholar
–. 2007. “Anselmian Eternalism: The Presence of a Timeless God”. Faith and Philosophy 24(1), 3–27. doi: 10.5840/faithphil200724134.10.5840/faithphil200724134Search in Google Scholar
–. 2008. Anselm on Freedom. Oxford.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199231676.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
–. 2009. “Back to Eternalism: A Response to Leftow’s “Anselmian Presentism”. Faith and Philosophy 26(3), 320–38. doi: 10.5840/faithphil200926317.10.5840/faithphil200926317Search in Google Scholar
Sorabji, R. 1983. Time, Creation and the Continuum: Theories in Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages. London.Search in Google Scholar
Stump, E./Kretzman, N. 1981. “Eternity”. Journal of Philosophy 78(8), 429–58. doi: 10.2307/2026047.10.4324/9780415249126-K017-1Search in Google Scholar
© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
