Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Castration Anxiety

Physicians, “Do No Harm,” and Chemical Sterilization Laws

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Chemical castration laws, such as one recently adopted in the U.S. State of Louisiana, raise challenging ethical concerns for physicians. Even if such interventions were to prove efficacious, which is far from certain, they would still raise troubling concerns regarding the degree of medical risk that may be imposed upon prisoners in the name of public safety as well as the appropriate role for physicians and other health care professionals in the administration of pharmaceuticals to competent prisoners over the inmates’ unequivocal objections. This paper argues that the concerns raised by chemical castration are grave enough that, until they are adequately addressed by policymakers, physicians ought not to participate in the process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Other agents, such as Depo-Lupron or Tamoxifen, might also be used as castrating agents, with their own series of effects, but all U.S. state laws currently require either depot medroxy-progesterone acetate or its “medical equivalent,” and there is no evidence that any hormone other than Depo-Provera is currently being used in the United States. Goserelin (Zoladex), a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) antagonist, is used in Great Britain.

  2. Paraphilias are generally considered to include sexual gratification achieved principally through activities involving nonhuman objects, animals, or non-consenting partners.

References

  • Act 441 of the Louisiana Legislature, 2008. SB 144.

  • Almeida, O.P., and A. Waterreus. 2004. One year follow-up study of the association between chemical castration, sex hormones, beta-amyloid, memory and depression in men. Psychoneuroendocrinology 29(8): 1071–1081.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Appel, J.M. 2003. The forcible treatment of criminal defendants. Medicine & Health Rhode Island 86(11): 367–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appel, J.M. 2011. Capital punishment, psychiatrists and the potential “bottleneck” of competence. Journal of Law and Health 24(1): 45–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlin, J. 1997. Chemical castration of sex offenders: “A shot in the arm” towards rehabilitation. Whittier Law Review 19(1): 169–213.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Berlin, F.S., and C.F. Meinecke. 1981. Treatment of sex offenders with antiandrogenic medication: Conceptualization, review of treatment modalities, and preliminary findings. The American Journal of Psychiatry 138(5): 601–607.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boodman, S.G. 1992. Does castration stop sex crimes? An old punishment gains new attention, but experts doubt its value. The Washington Post, March 17, 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bund, J.M. 1997. Did you say chemical castration? University of Pittsburgh Law Review 59(1): 157–192.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cundy, T., J. Cornish, M.C. Evans, H. Roberts, and I.R. Reid. 1994. Recovery of bone density in women who use medroxyprogesterone acetate. British Medical Journal 308(6923): 247–248.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gostin, L.O. 2003. Compulsory medical treatment: The limits of bodily integrity. The Hastings Center Report 33(5): 11–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, K. 2007. The high risk sex offender strategy in England and Wales: Is chemical castration an option? The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice 46(1): 16–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helscher, D. 1994. Griswold v. Connecticut and the unenumerated right of privacy. Northern Illinois University Law Review 15(1): 33–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilts, P.J. 1992. Panel urges contraceptives approval. The New York Times, June 20, 1992 6.

  • Scholes, D., A.Z. LaCroix, L.E. Ichikawa, W.E. Barlow, and S.M. Ott. 2005. Change in bone mineral density among adolescent women using and discontinuing depot medroxyprogesterone acetate contraception. Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine 159(2): 139–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slater, D. 2008. The judge says don’t get pregnant. A lapsed law now sees new life. The Wall Street Journal, September 25, A18.

  • Spalding, L.H. 1998. Florida’s chemical castration law: A return to the Dark Ages. Florida State University Law Review 25: 117–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Food and Drug Administration. 2004. Black box warning added concerning long-term use of Depo-Provera contraceptive injection. FDA Talk Paper T04-50, November 17.

  • Veitch, A. 1984. Cancer fears in US over Depo Provera. The Guardian, October 30, 4.

  • White, P., C. Bradley, M. Ferriter, and L. Hatzipetrou. 2009. Managements for people with disorders of sexual preference and for convicted sexual offenders. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, no. 4. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD000251.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jacob M. Appel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Appel, J.M. Castration Anxiety. Bioethical Inquiry 9, 85–91 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-011-9341-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-011-9341-z

Keywords

Navigation