Skip to main content
Log in

Proof-Theoretic Aspects of Paraconsistency with Strong Consistency Operator

  • Published:
Studia Logica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to develop efficient tools for automated reasoning with inconsistency (theorem provers), eventually making Logics of Formal inconsistency (LFI) a more appealing formalism for reasoning under uncertainty, it is important to develop the proof theory of the first-order versions of such LFIs. Here, we intend to make a first step in this direction. On the other hand, the logic Ciore was developed to provide new logical systems in the study of inconsistent databases from the point of view of LFIs. An interesting fact about Ciore is that it has a strong consistency operator, that is, a consistency operator which (forward/backward) propagates inconsistency. Also, it turns out to be an algebraizable logic (in the sense of Blok and Pigozzi) that can be characterized by means of a 3-valued logical matrix. Recently, a first-order version of Ciore, namely QCiore, was defined preserving the spirit of Ciore, that is, without introducing unexpected relationships between the quantifiers. Besides, some important model-theoretic results were obtained for this logic. In this paper we study some proof–theoretic aspects of both Ciore and QCiore respectively. In first place, we introduce a two-sided sequent system for Ciore. Later, we prove that this system enjoys the cut-elimination property and apply it to derive some interesting properties. Later, we extend the above-mentioned system to first-order languages and prove completeness and cut-elimination property using the well-known Shütte’s technique.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Avron, A., Non-deterministic semantics for logics with a consistency operator, Journal of Approximate Reasoning 45: 271–287, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Avron, A., J. Ben-Naim, and B. Konikowska, Cut-free ordinary sequent calculi for logics having generalized finite–valued semantics, Logica Universalis 1: 41–69, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Avron, A., and B. Konikowska, Multi-valued Calculi for logics based on non-determinism, in Proceedings COS’04 (Challenge of Semantics Workshop), Vienna 2004; also in: Logic Journal of the IGPL 13(4): 365–387, 2005.

  4. Avron, A., B. Konikowska, and A. Zamansky, Modular construction of cut-free sequent Calculi for paraconsistent logics, in Proceedings of the 27th Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, 2012, pp. 85–94.

  5. Cantú, L., Sobre la lógica que preserva grados de verdad asociada a las álgebras de Stone involutivas. Masters dissertation, Universidad Nacional del Sur (Bahía Blanca, Argentina), 2019.

  6. Cantú, L., and M. Figallo, On the logic that preserves degrees of truth associated to involutive Stone algebras, Logic Journal of the IGPL 28(5): 1000–1020, 2020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cantú, L., and M. Figallo, Cut-free sequent-style systems for a logic associated to involutive Stone algebras, Journal of Logic and Computation 33(7):1684–1710, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1093/logcom/exac061

  8. Carnielli, W., and M. E. Coniglio, Paraconsistent Logic: Consistency, Contradiction and Negation, vol. 40 of Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science Series, Springer, 2016.

  9. Carnielli, W. A., M. E. Coniglio, and J. Marcos, Logics of formal inconsistency, in D. Gabbay, and F. Guenthner, (eds.), Handbook of Philosophical Logic, vol. 14, Springer, 2007, pp. 1–93.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Carnielli, W. A., and J. Marcos, A taxonomy of C-systems, in W. A. Carnielli, M. E. Coniglio, and I. M. L. D’Ottaviano, (eds.), Paraconsistency—The Logical Way to the Inconsistent, vol. 228 of Lecture Notes in Pure and Applied Mathematics, Marcel Dekker, New York, 2002, pp. 1–94.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Carnielli, W. A., J. Marcos, and S. de Amo, Formal inconsistency and evolutionary databases, Logic and Logical Philosophy 8: 115–152, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Coniglio, M. E., G. T. Gomez-Pereira, and M. Figallo, Some model–theoretic results on the 3-valued paraconsistent first-order logic QCiore, The Review of Symbolic Logic 4(1): 187–224, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755020319000595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. da Costa, N. C. A., Inconsistent Formal Systems (in Portuguese), Habilitation Thesis, 1963. Republished by Editora UFPR, Curitiba, 1993.

  14. da Costa, N. C. A., On the theory of inconsistent formal systems (Lecture delivered at the First Latin-American Colloquium on Mathematical Logic, held at Santiago, Chile, July 1970), Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 15(4): 497–510.

  15. da Costa, N. C. A., Calculs propositionnel pour les systèmes formels inconsistants, Comptes Rendus de l’Académie de Sciences de Paris, série A 257: 3790–3792, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  16. da Costa, N. C. A., J.-Y. Béziau, and O. Bueno, Aspects of paraconsistent logic, Bulletin of the IGPL 3(4): 597–614, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Figallo, M., Cut-free sequent calculus and natural deduction for the tetravalent modal logic, Studia Logica 109: 1347–1373, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-021-09944-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mikenberg, I., N. C. A. da Costa, and R. Chuaqui, Pragmatic truth and approximation to truth, The Journal of Symbolic Logic 51(1): 201–221, 1986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Takeuti, G., Proof Theory (2nd edn.), Dover Publications, Mineola, New York, 2013 [1975]

Download references

Acknowledgements

V. A. Pistone is grateful to CONICET for providing financial support for this research. M. Figallo was partially supported by the Visiting Researcher Award program funded by FAPESP grant 2022/03862-2.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martín Figallo.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Special Issue: Contemporary Logic in Brazil

Edited by Edward H. Haeusler, Ciro Russo, and Gisele Secco.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Arce Pistone, V., Figallo, M. Proof-Theoretic Aspects of Paraconsistency with Strong Consistency Operator. Stud Logica (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-023-10089-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-023-10089-8

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation