Abstract
In his classic text, A Theory of Justice, John Rawls argues that the structural principles of a society are just when they issue from a procedure that is fair. One crucial feature that makes the procedure fair is that the persons who will be subjected to these principles choose them after they have deliberated together in a condition marked by a certain balance of knowledge and ignorance. In particular, these people know enough to consider principles that are workable, yet converse behind a “veil of ignorance,” unable to predict what their place in society will be and hence discouraged from slanting the principles toward any preferential interests. My paper questions whether this attempt to ensure the disinterestedness of the conversation of justice is feasible. I worry that when we approach this question practically, we discover that the education that furnishes us with the knowledge necessary to choose viable principles must at the same time preclude genuine ignorance about our social position and interests. As an alternative, I suggest that we convene the conversation of justice behind a “veil of existence.” In this condition, people possess knowledge about how their society works and even about their places in it; however, this knowledge does not foster preferential interests because all interests are subjected to the question of their existential meaning. As Jean-Paul Sartre explains in his essay, “Existentialism is a Humanism,” for our interests to be truly meaningful, they must be affirmed as free responses to our thrownness into existence. Yet how do we find the wherewithal to make such responsible choices rather than lapse into paralysis before their essentially arbitrary differences? My positive thesis is that we may do so by acknowledging how all of us in this existential predicament critically and mutually provoke each to commit oneself to depart from the others in specific ways. This process of provocation is thus educational. It broaches a conception of non-instrumental, non-mimetic, liberal study, one which I try to enact in a writing that employs direct address, regular returns to questions that put discourse at a loss, and expanding webs of association. In this manner, I hope to demonstrate that liberal study may deepen our appreciation of our communal nature, our camaraderie, and thus motivate us to participate unselfishly in the conversation of justice.
References
Buck-Morss, S. (2010). The second time as farce…. Historical pragmatics and the untimely present. In S. Zizek (Ed.), The idea of communism (pp. 67–80). London: Verso.
Emerson, R. W. (1983). The divinity school address. In J. Porte (Ed.), Essays and lectures (pp. 73–92). New York: Literary Classics of the United States.
Felman, S. (1987). Jacques Lacan and the adventure of insight: Psychoanalysis in contemporary culture. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Jackson, P. W. (1986). The mimetic and the transformative: Alternative outlooks on teaching. In The practice of teaching (pp. 115–145). New York: Teachers College Press.
Kierkegaard, S. (1983). Fear and trembling (H. V. Hong & E. H. Hong, Trans.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Lyotard, J.-F. (1988). The differend: Phrases in dispute (G. V. D. Abbeele, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
McClintock, R. (1971). Toward a place for study in a world of instruction. Teachers College Record, 73(2), 161–205.
Oakeshott, M. (1989). A place of learning. In T. Fuller (Ed.), The voice of liberal learning: Michael Oakeshott on education (pp. 17–42). New Haven: Yale University Press.
Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Rivette, J. (2001). Secret defense, DVD. Chatworth, CA: Image Entertainment.
Salinger, J. D. (1961). Franny and Zooey. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
Sartre, J.-P. (2007). Existentialism is a humanism (C. Macomber, Trans.). New Haven: Yale University Press.
Taylor, C. (1989). Sources of the self: The making of the modern identity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Whitman, W. (1958). Song of myself. In Leaves of grass (pp. 49–96). New York: The New American Library.
Acknowledgments
In addition to the editors, I would like to thank Erika Goble, Nigel Tubbs, and Rachel Wahl for helpful comments on earlier drafts of this essay.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Arcilla, R.V. Rawls, Sartre, and the Question of Camaraderie. Stud Philos Educ 32, 491–502 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-012-9345-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-012-9345-0