Res novae: Die „Cena Trimalchionis“ und der Kreislauf der Transgression

Article Authentication required
Subscibe in publisher´s online store Share via email
Res novae: Die „Cena Trimalchionis“ und der Kreislauf der Transgression
Aresi, Laura

From the journal Hermes Hermes, Volume 147, December 2019, issue 4

Published by Franz Steiner Verlag

article, 6772 Words
Original language: German
Hermes 2019, pp 469-482
https://doi.org/10.25162/hermes-2019-0039

Abstract Related content References

Abstract

In the „Cena Trimalchionis“ Encolpius is continually faced with Trimalchio’s oddities (res novae, sat. 27, 2). The paper aims to highlight the occurrence of a ‚scheme of the res novae‘, a narrative pattern that repeats itself during the „Cena“ and in which the only variation is constituted by Encolpius’ reactions to Trimalchio’s jokes: while the host is never tired of testing his guests’ intelligence with (mostly gastronomic) enigmas, Encolpius moves from amazement to skepticism to the desire of competing with Trimalchio in foreseeing his plans. Encolpius’ suppositions mainly link Trimalchio’s stratagems to the world of the theatre and of the Saturnalia: following his footsteps modern critics often used the same references to explain Trimalchio’s eccentric ideas. The present essay will show that the point of view of the narrator, Encolpius, is not to be confused with the strategy of Trimalchio, who takes over the imaginary of the theatre and of the Saturnalia only to overthrow them in search of a totally new and ‚not foreseeable‘ transgression.

Author information

Laura Aresi

Related content

References

  • 1. Bachtin, M. , Literatur und Karneval. Zur Romantheorie und Lachkultur, Frankfurt 1990 (aus dem russischen Original übersetzt, Moskau 1965).
  • 2. Barchiesi, M. , L’orologio di Trimalchione, in: M. B., I moderni alla ricerca di Enea, Roma 1981, 109-146.
  • 3. Conte, G. B. , The Hidden Author. An Interpretation of Petronius’ „Satyricon“, Berkeley/Los Angeles/London 1996.
  • 4. Courtney, E. , A Companion to Petronius, Oxford/New York 2001.
  • 5. Cucchiarelli, A. , Omero e la Sibilla. Mimesi e oralità nella „Cena Trimalchionis“, in: Seeing Tongues, Hearing Scripts. Orality and Representation in the Ancient Novel, edited by V. Rimell, Groningen 2007, 23-60.
  • 6. Döpp, S. , Saturnalien und lateinische Literatur, in: Karnevaleske Phänomene in antiken und nachantiken Kulturen und Literaturen, herausgegeben von S. Döpp, Trier 1993, 145-177.
  • 7. Fedeli, P. , Il romanzo, in: Lo spazio letterario di Roma antica, a cura di G. Cavallo, P. Fedeli, A. Giardina, 1, Roma 1993.
  • 8. Frangoulidis, S. , Trimalchio as Narrator and Stage Director in the „Cena“: An Unobserved Parallelism in Petronius’ „Satyricon“ 78, in: Classical Philology 103 2008, 81-87. DOI 10.1086/590096
  • 9. Gianotti, G. F. , Spettacoli comici, attori e spettatori in Petronio, in: La commedia latina: modelli, forme, ideologia, fortuna, a cura di M. Blancato e G. Nuzzo, Siracusa 2009, 77-127.
  • 10. Gianotti, G. F. , La cena di Trimalchione. Dal „Satyricon“ di Petronio, Acireale/Roma 2013.
  • 11. Grondona, M. , Il modello dei Saturnali nella „Cena Trimalchionis“ (ed il testo di 58, 2), in: Materiali e discussioni per l’analisi dei testi classici 1 1978, 209-213. DOI 10.2307/40235714
  • 12. Grondona, M. , La religione e la superstizione nella „Cena Trimalchionis“, Bruxelles 1980.
  • 13. Kirichenko, A. , Satura und Pikareske: Der unendliche Spaß der „Satyrica“ Petrons, in: Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik 44, 175 2014, 24-48. DOI 10.1007/bf03379983
  • 14. Labate, M. , Indecifrabilità del reale e prepotenza dell’immaginario nei „Satyrica“ di Petronio, in: Lector, intende, laetaberis. Il romanzo dei Greci e dei Latini, a cura di AA. VV., Alessandria 2010, 147-164.
  • 15. Labate, M. , Nihil sine ratione facio: la struttura enigmistica della „Cena Trimalchionis“ [i. E.].
  • 16. Newton, R. M. , Petronian Urbanity in the ‚Carpe, Carpe‘ Joke (Petr., sat. 35.7-36.8), in: Syllecta Classica 3, 67-69. DOI 10.1353/syl.1992.0000
  • 17. Panayotakis, C. , Theatrum Arbitri: Theatrical Elements in the „Satyrica“ of Petronius, Leiden 1995. DOI 10.1163/9789004329515
  • 18. Rimell, V. , Petronius and the anatomy of fiction, Cambridge 2002.
  • 19. Rosati, G. , Trimalchione in scena, in: Maia 35 1983, 213-227.
  • 20. Schmeling, G. , A commentary on the „Satyrica“ of Petronius, Oxford 2011.
  • 21. Schwindt, J. P. , Blinde Mimesis. Über Ordo und Kontingenz in der literaturgeschichtlichen Traditionsbildung (Horaz und Petron), in: Dictynna [En ligne] 1 2004, 1-11.
  • 22. Smith, M. S. (ed.), Petronius, Cena Trimalchionis, Oxford 1975.
  • 23. Tilg, S. , Die Flucht als literarisches Prinzip in Petrons „Satyrica“, in: Materiali e discussioni per l’analisi dei testi classici 49 2002, 213-226. DOI 10.2307/40236233
  • 24. Vannini, G. , Petronius 1975-2005: bilancio critico e nuove proposte, Göttingen 2007 (= Lustrum 49).
  • 25. Weeber, K. W. (hg.), Petronius Arbiter, Cena Trimalchionis. Das Gastmahl des Trimalchio, Stuttgart 2016.