Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton June 26, 2019

Between the institution and the individual: What walking in a place that includes institutional heritage discloses

  • Einav Argaman EMAIL logo
From the journal Semiotica

Abstract

This article discusses the ways in which “walking” in a place that exhibits institutional heritage (albeit is not set as a separate gallery) discloses individuality within institutional/hegemonic intent. Examining photographs taken in a place that, among other activities, comprises institutional heritage, the article adds to the literature by specifying a new mode of walking in heritage “sites.” Walking is regarded a semiotic resource; hence, the article’s insights relate to: (a) arguments in the institution, (b) definitions of “center,” (c) “attractors” in retailing and museums (as places which present heritage), and (d) the architecture of paths. The final section of the article considers heritage in educational institutions (the specific environment that the article discusses). It relates to the characteristics of classroom talk and offers recommendations for incorporating them in exhibitions dedicated to the heritage of education institutions, as a means to establish teachers’ professional identity.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Levinsky College of Education.

References

Carman, John & Marie Stig Sørensen. 2009. Heritage studies: An outline. In Marie Stig Sørensen & John Carman (eds.), Heritage studies: Methods and approaches, 11–28. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203871713Search in Google Scholar

Copeland, Tim. 2006. Constructing pasts: Interpreting the historic environment. In Alison Hems & Marion Blockley (eds.), Heritage interpretation, 81–95. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

De Certeau, Michel. 1984. The practice of everyday life, Steven Rendall (trans.). Berkeley: University of California Press.Search in Google Scholar

Erickson, Frederic & Gerald Mohatt. 1982. Cultural organization of participation structures in two classrooms of Indian students. In George Dearborn Spindler (ed.), Doing the ethnography of schooling, 132–174. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Search in Google Scholar

Falk, John H. & Lynn D. Dierking. 2013. The museum experience revisited. Abingdon: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Gee, James Paul. 2000. Identity as an analytic lens for research in education. Review of Research in Education 25. 99–125.10.2307/1167322Search in Google Scholar

Goffman, Erving. 1981. Forms of talk. Philadelphia: Pennsylvania University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Goodwin, Charles. 1986. Audience diversity, participation, and interpretation. Text 6(3). 283–316.10.1515/text.1.1986.6.3.283Search in Google Scholar

Goodwin, Charles. 2007. Interactive footing. In Elizabeth Holt & Rebecca Clift (eds.), Reporting talk: Reported speech in interaction, 16–46. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486654.003Search in Google Scholar

Harvey, David C. 2001. Heritage pasts and heritage presents: Temporality, meaning and the scope of heritage studies. International Journal of Heritage Studies 7(4). 319–338.10.1080/13581650120105534Search in Google Scholar

Hatuka, Tali. 2008. Walking as politics. In Giovanna Borasi & Mirko Zardini (eds.), Actions: Playing, gardening, recycling and walking, 70–77. Montréal: CCA.Search in Google Scholar

Heilbronner, Oded & Michael Levin (eds). 2007. Beyin Sderot Le-Sderot Rotchild: Yaxaseyi Merkaz Periferiya Ba-Tarbut Ha-Israelit [Between Sderot and Tel-Aviv: Center-periphery relations in Israeli culture]. Tel-Aviv: Resling.Search in Google Scholar

Hertzberger, Herman. 2008. Space and learning. Rotterdam: 010.Search in Google Scholar

Hobsbawm, Eric J. 1990. Nations and nationalism since 1780: Programme, myth, reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Humphries, Peter. 2006. Heritage interpretation and Cadw. In Alison Hems & Marion Blockley (eds.), Heritage interpretation, 71–82. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Hunt, John Dixson. 2003. “Lordship of the feet”: Toward a poetics of movement in the garden. In Michel Conan (ed.), Landscape design and the experience of motion, 187–213. Washington, DC: Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection.Search in Google Scholar

Hutchby, Ian. 2001. “Oh,” irony and sequential ambiguity in arguments. Discourse and Society 12. 123–141.10.1177/0957926501012002001Search in Google Scholar

Ilkka, Arminen. 2005. Institutional interaction: Studies of talk at work. Hants: Ashgate.Search in Google Scholar

Jacobs, Jane. 1961. The death and life of great American cities. New York: Random House.Search in Google Scholar

Jakobson, Roman. 1960. Closing statement: Linguistics and poetics. In Thomas A. Sebeok (ed.), Styles in language, 350–377. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Leon, Warren & Margaret Piatt. 1989. Living history museums. In Warren Leon‏ & Roy Rosenzweig (eds.), History museums: A critical assessment in the United States, 64–97. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Search in Google Scholar

Loulanski, Tolina. 2006. Revising the concept for cultural heritage: The argument for a functional approach. International Journal of Cultural Property 13(2). 207–233.10.1017/S0940739106060085Search in Google Scholar

Lowenthal, David. 1996. The heritage crusade and the spoils of history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lowenthal, David. 1998. Fabricating heritage. History and Memory 10(1). 5–24.Search in Google Scholar

Mildorf, Jarmila. 2016. Pictures into sound: Aural world-making in art gallery audio-guide. In Jarmila Mildorf & Till Kinzel (eds.), Audionarratology, 239–256. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110472752-015Search in Google Scholar

Murzyn, Monika A. 2006. New interpretations and commercialization of heritage in Krakow after 1989. In Sebastian Schröder-Esch (ed.), Practical aspects of cultural heritage: Presentation, revaluation, development, 167–188. Weimar: Bauhaus-Universität Weimar.Search in Google Scholar

Nora, Pierre. 1989. Between memory and history. Representations 26. 7–24.10.1525/rep.1989.26.1.99p0274vSearch in Google Scholar

Parr, Carol. 2006. Public art: Its role and medium for interpretation. In Alison Hems & Marion Blockley (eds.), Heritage interpretation, 123–140. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles S. 1998. Essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings, vol. 2 (1893–1913), Peirce Edition Project (eds.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press. [Reference to vol. 2 of Essential Peirce will be designated EP 2.].Search in Google Scholar

Penn, Alan. 2005. The complexity of the elementary interface: Shopping space. In Akkelies van Nes (ed.), Proceedings of the fifth international space syntax symposium, 25–43. Amsterdam: Delft, Techne Press.Search in Google Scholar

Price, Jon. 2006. Interpreting industrial heritage. In Alison Hems & Marion Blockley (eds.), Heritage interpretation, 111–121. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Proctor, Nancy. 2011. From headphones to microphones: Mobile social media in the museum as distributed network. In Alex Ibáñez Exteberria (ed.), Museos, redes socials y tecnología 2.0/museum, social media & 2.0 technology, 27–53. País Vasco: Euskal Herriko Unibertsitateko Argitalpen Zerbitzua.Search in Google Scholar

Robertshaw, Andrew. 2006. Live interpretation. In Alison Hems & Marion Blockley (eds.), Heritage interpretation, 41–54. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Rosenberg, Elissa. 2012. Walking in the city: Memory and place. Journal of Architecture 17(1). 131–149.10.1080/13602365.2012.659914Search in Google Scholar

Saft, Scott. 2004. Conflict as interactional accomplishment in Japan: Arguments in university faculty meetings. Language in Society 33. 549–584.10.1017/S0047404504334032Search in Google Scholar

Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1998. Body torque. Social Research 65(3). 535–596.Search in Google Scholar

Schegloff, Emanuel A. 2000. When “others” initiate repair. Applied Linguistics 21(2). 205–243.10.1093/applin/21.2.205Search in Google Scholar

Schegloff, Emanuel A., Gail Jefferson & Harvey Sacks. 1977. The preference of self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language 53(2). 361–382.10.1353/lan.1977.0041Search in Google Scholar

Smith, Laurajane. 2006. Uses of heritage. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203602263Search in Google Scholar

Souther, Mark J. 2007. The Disneyfication of New Orleans: The French quarter as façade in a divided city. Journal of American History 94(3). 804–811.10.2307/25095142Search in Google Scholar

Spector, J. Michael 2010. An overview of progress and problems in educational technology. Interactive Educational Multimedia 1. 27–37.Search in Google Scholar

Thom-Santelli, Jennifer, Catalina Toma, Kirsten Boehner & Geri Gay. 2005. Beyond just the facts: Museum detective guides. HCI Group, Cornell University.10.1145/1125451.1125715Search in Google Scholar

Wilson, Le & E. Von. 2012. An assessment of learning outcomes based on a comparison of active learning and traditional lecture pedagogical styles in a legal environment classroom. Southern Journal of Business & Ethics 4. 101–110.Search in Google Scholar

Wunderlich, Filipa Matos. 2008. Walking and rhythmicity: Sensing urban space. Journal of Urban Design 13(1). 125–139.10.1080/13574800701803472Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2019-06-26
Published in Print: 2019-07-26

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 30.5.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/sem-2017-0147/html
Scroll to top button