Abstract
This paper discusses the philosophical argument and the application of the Triple Font Theory (TFT) for moral evaluation of human acts and attempts to integrate the conceptual components of major moral theories into a systematic internally consistent decision-making model that is theoretically driven. The paper incorporates concepts such as formal and material cooperation and the Principle of Double Effect (PDE) into the theoretical framework. It also advances the thesis that virtue theory ought to be included in any adequate justification of morality and the need to integrate or coordinate notions of virtue into various act-oriented or principles-based ethics. The TFT offers a comprehensive and practical approach to ethical decision-making and is a useful alternative embedded in traditional wisdom. This paper provides a more general framework of the TFT than traditionally presented. Practical judgment is shown to play a constitute role in providing a guide for right action and is the “glue” that integrates the various components of the TFT.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anscombe G. E. M. (1982) Action, Intention and Double Effect. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 56:12–25
Aqunias T. (1948) Summa Theologica Volume II. Christian Classics, Notre Dame, IN
Arjoon S. (2000) Virtue Theory as a Dynamic Theory of Business. Journal of Business Ethics 28:159–178
Audi R. (1995a) The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Audi R. (1995b) Acting From Virtue. Mind 140(415):449–471
Barnsley J. (1972) The Social Reality of Ethics. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London
Bastons, M.: 2006, ‘Moral Competencies in Decision-Making’, Paper Presented at the 4th International Symposium on Ethics, Business and Society on “Toward a Comprehensive Integration of Ethics Into Management: Problems and Prospects', IESE Business School, University of Navarra, May 18–19, Barcelona, Spain
Berkman J. (1997) How Important is the Doctrine of Double Effect for Moral Theology? Contextualizing the Controversy. Christian Bioethics 3(2):89–114
Boatright J. (2003) Ethics and the Conduct of Business. Prentice Hall, NJ
Boyle J. (2001) Toward Understanding the Principle of Double Effect. In: Woodward P. A. (ed.), The Doctrine of Double Effect: Philosophers Debate a Controversial Moral Principle. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame Indiana
Bricker P. (1980) Prudence. The Journal of Philosophy 77(7):381–401
Buccholtz R., Rosenthal S. (1998) Business Ethics: The Pragmatic Path Beyond Principles to Process. Prentice Hall, NJ
Carroll A., Buchholtz A. (2000) Business and Society: Ethics and Stakeholder Management. South-Western, United States
Cavanaugh G., Moberg J., Valasquez M. (1995) Making Business Ethics Practical. Business Ethics Quarterly 513:399–418
Cessario R. (2001) Introduction to Moral Theology. The Catholic University of America Press, Washington, D.C
Crockett C. (2005) The Cultural Paradigm of Virtue. Journal of Business Ethics 62:191–208
De George R. (1999) Business Ethics. Prentice Hall, NJ
Donaldson T., Werhane P. (1996) Ethical Issues in Business: A Philosophical Approach. Prentice Hall, NJ
Entine, J.: 1988, The Ethical Edge, http://www.about-ecoli.com/news/odevallaib.htm
Fagothey A. (1959) Rights and Reason. Tan Books and Publishers Inc, Rockford, IL
Finnis, J.: 1999, Natural Law and Natural Rights. Clarendon Law Series (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
Fortenbaugh W. (1964) Aristotle’s Conception of Moral Virtue and Its Perceptive Role. Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philosophical Association 95:77–87
Fowers B. (2003) Reason and Human Fortitude: In Praise of Practical Wisdom. The American Behavioral Scientist 47(4):415–422
French P. (1996) Integrity, Intentions and Corporations. American Business Law Journal 34(2):141–155
Glynn K. (1999) Double Effect. Commonweal 126(2):10–18
Golding M. (1963) Principled Judicial Decision-Making. Ethics 73(4):247–250
Horvath C. (1995) Excellence vs. Effectiveness: MacIntyre’s Critique of Business. Business Ethics Quarterly 5(3):449–532
Higgins T. (1992) Man as Man: The Science and Art of Ethics, Revised Edition. Tan Books and Publishers Inc, Rockford, Illinois
Hosenball, M.: 2006, ‘Can the President Order a Killing on US Soil?’, Newsweek February 12, 6
Hosmer T. (1994) Moral Leadership in Business. Irwin/McGraw-Hill, Boston, MA
Hursthouse R. (1999) On Virtue Ethics. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK
Jonsen A., Toulmin S. (1988) The Abuse of Casuistry: A History of Moral Reasoning. University of California, Berkeley
Kaczor C. (1998) Double Effect Reasoning from Jean Pierre Gury to Peter Kraner. Theological Studies 59(2):247–316
Keenan J. (1993) The Function of the Principle of Double Effect. Theological Studies 54(2):294–315
Laird J. (1946) Act Ethics and Agent Ethics. Mind 55(218):113–132
Ledden (1942) Virtue, Obligatoriness and Rightness. Mind 56(224):351–354
Louden, R.: 1984, ‘On Some Vices of Virtue Ethics’, in R. Crisp and M. Stole (eds.), 1997, Virtue Ethics (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
Maclagan P. (2003) Varieties of Moral Issue and Dilemma: A Framework for the Analysis of Case Material in Business Ethics Education. Journal of Business Ethics 48(1):21–31
Masek L. (2000) The Doctrine of Double Effect: Deadly Drugs and Business Ethics: A Reply to Valasquez and Brady. Business Ethics Quarterly 10:483–495
Mele D. (1997) Etica en la Dirreccion de Empresas. IESE, Universidad de Navarra, Barcelona
Mintz S. (1996) Aristotelian Virtue and Business Ethics Education. Journal of Business Ethics 15:827–838
Moore G., Beadle R. (2006) In Search of Organizational Virtue in Business: Agents, Goods, Practices, Institutions and Environments. Organizational Studies 27(3):369–389
Nussbaum M. (1986) The Fragility of Goodness: Luck and Ethics in Greek Tragedy and Philosophy. Cambridge University, New York
Nussbaum, M.: 1988, ‘Non Relative Virtues: An Aristotelian Approach’, in P. French, T. Uehling and H. Wettstein (eds.), Midwest Studies in Philosophy, in Ethical Theory, Character and Virtue (University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame)
O’Keefe M. (1987) Known from the Things That Are: Fundamental Theory of the Moral Life. Center for Thomistic Studies, University of St. Thomas, Houston, TX
Post J., Lawrence A., Weber J. (2002) Business and Society: Corporate Strategy, Public Policy, and Ethics. McGraw-Hill, New York
Quill T., Dresser R., Brock D. (1997) The Role of Double Effect: A Critique of its Role in End-of-Life Decisions. The New England Journal of Medicine 337(24):1768–1772
Rossouw G. J. (2002) Business is Not Just War: Transferring the Principle of Double Effect from War to Business. South African Journal of Philosophy 22(3):236–246
Sherman N. (1989) The Fabric of Character: Aristotle’s Theory of Virtue. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK
Smith J. (1991) Humanae Vitae: A Generation Later. The Catholic University of America Press, Washington, D.C.
Sulmasy D. (2000) Commentary: Double Effect-Intention is the Solution, Not the Problem. The Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 28(1):26–30
Tully P. (2005) The Doctrine of Double Effect and the Question of Constraints on Business Decisions. Journal of Business Ethics 58:51–63
Underwood, A.: 1997, `Today the Sheep...', Newsweek, March 10, pp. 48
Valasquez M. (2002) Business Ethics: Concepts and Cases. Prentice Hall, NJ
Waide J. (1988) Virtues and Principles. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 48(3):455–472
Wallace W. (1997) The Elements Of Philosophy: A Compendium For Philosophers and Theologians. Alba House, New York
Weiss J. (2003) Business Ethics: A Stakeholder And Issues Management Approach. Thomson/South Western, Canada
Whetstone J. T. (2001) How Virtue Fits Within Business Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 33(2):101–114
Williams G. (2001) The Principle of Double Effect and Terminal Sedation. Medical Law Review 9(1):41–53
Woodward P. A. (2001) The Doctrine of Double Effect: Philosophers Debate a Controversial Moral Principle. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, Indiana
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Surendra Arjoon is an Associate Professor of Business Ethics at the University of the West Indies, Trinidad. He has served as Chair, Department of Management Studies and as Associate Dean, Faculty of Social Sciences. He is also Vice President of the Trinidad & Tobago Economics Association. His work has appeared in the Journal of Business Ethics, Journal of Markets and Morality, Global Development Studies, Applied Financial Economics, and Social and Economic Studies.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Arjoon, S. Ethical Decision-Making: A Case for the Triple Font Theory. J Bus Ethics 71, 395–410 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9142-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9142-1