Skip to main content
Log in

Rejecting the order of public reason

  • Published:
Philosophical Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Notes

  1. Gaus (2011). Page numbers enclosed in parentheses of the text refer to this book. For John Rawls on public reason, see especially his A Theory of Justice (1999); also Rawls (1996).

  2. Anscombe (1981, p. 52).

  3. Cf. Rousseau (1987).

  4. On the need for distinct and separate levels of moral thinking, (see Hare 1981). Hare speaks of intuitive and critical thinking. I would suppose the levels include one of fundamental moral principles, one of public morality, one of informal social rules, another of enforced legal rules and policies. Hare writes from a consequentialist standpoint, but the point he is making is not sectarian: both consequentialists and nonconseqentialists will need to distinguish various levels of moral thinking.

References

  • Anscombe, G. E. M. (1981). War and murder. Reprinted in her Ethics, religion, and politics (pp. 51–61). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

  • Gaus, G. (2011). The order of public reason: A theory of freedom and morality in a diverse and bounded world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare, R. M. (1981). Moral thinking: Its levels, method, and point. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1996). Political liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.

  • Rawls, J. (1999). A theory of justice, rev. ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Rousseau, J.-J. (1987). The social contract. In The basic political writings (Ed. and Trans: Cress D.) (pp. 139–227). Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Co.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard Arneson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Arneson, R. Rejecting the order of public reason . Philos Stud 170, 537–544 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-013-0268-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-013-0268-6

Keywords

Navigation