Abstract
This paper represents the first installment of alarger project devoted to the relevance of pragmatism forbioethics. One self-consciously pragmatist move would be toreturn to the classical pragmatist canon of Peirce, James andDewey in search of substantive doctrines or methodologicalapproaches that might be applied to current bioethicalcontroversies. Another pragmatist (or neopragmatist) move wouldbe to subject the regnant principlist paradigm to Richard Rorty'ssubversive assaults on foundationalism in epistemology andethics. A third pragmatist method, dubbed ``freestandingpragmatism'' by its proponents, embraces a ``pragmatist'' approachto practical reasoning without discernable moorings either to theclassical canon or to Rorty's neopragmatism. This thirdpragmatist approach to method in practical ethics is the subjectof this article. I begin with an examination of freestandingpragmatism in the theory of judicial decision making. I arguethat this version of legal pragmatism – so described on account ofits commitments to contextualism, instrumentalism, eclecticism,and freedom from grand theory – bears a striking resemblance tomuch self-described pragmatist work in bioethics today. Ifurther argue that if this is what we mean by ``pragmatism,'' thenin a certain sense ``we are all pragmatists now.''
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
McGee G. The Perfect Baby: A Pragmatic Approach to Genetics. New York: Rowman and Littlefield, 1997.
McGee G, ed. Pragmatic Bioethics. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press, 1999.
Miller F, Fins J, Bacchetta M. Clinical pragmatism: John Dewey and clinical ethics. J Contemp Health Law and Policy 1996; 13: 27–51.
Benjamin M. Pragmatism and the Problems of Philosophy (manuscript).
Wolf S. Shifting paradigms in bioethics and health law: The rise of a new pragmatism. Am J Law Med 1994; 20: 395–415.
Grey T. Holmes and legal pragmatism. Stanford Law Rev 1989; 41: 787–870.
Dickstein M. The Revival of Pragmatism: New Essays on Social Thought, Law, and Culture. Durham: Duke University Press, 1998.
Symposium on the Renaissance of Pragmatism in American Legal Thought. So Cal Law Rev 1990; 63: 1569–1928.
Grey T. Freestanding legal pragmatism. In Dickstein M, ed. The Revival of Pragmatism: New Essays on Social Thought, Law, and Culture. Durham: Duke University Press, 1998, pp. 254–274.
Posner R. Pragmatic adjudication. In Dickstein M, ed. The Revival of Pragmatism: New Essays on Social Thought, Law, and Culture. Durham: Duke University Press, 1998, pp. 235–253.
Dworkin R. Law's Empire. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1988.
Blackhall L et al. Ethnicity and attitudes towards life sustaining technology. Soc Sci Med 1999; 48(12): 1779–1789.
Kass L. Towards a More Natural Science. New York: The Free Press, 1985.
Engelhardt HT. The Foundations of Bioethics, 2nd edn New York: Oxford University Press, 1996.
Singer P. Rethinking Life and Death. New York: St. Martin's Griffen, 1994.
Posner R. Reply to critics. Harvard Law Rev 1998; 111: 1796–1823.
Daniels N. Justice and Justification: Reflective Equilibrium in Theory and Practice. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
Kuczewski M. Bioethics’ consensus on method: Who could ask for anything more? In Nelson HL, ed. Stories and Their Limits. New York: Routledge, 1977.
Rorty R. Pragmatism and law: A response to David Luban. In Dickstein, ed. The Revival of Pragmatism: New Essays on Social Thought, Law, and Culture. Durham: Duke University Press, 1998, pp. 304–311.
Luban D. What's pragmatic about legal pragmatism? In Dickstein M, ed. The Revival of Pragmatism: New Essays on Social Thought, Law, and Culture. Durham: Duke University Press, 1998, pp. 275–303.
Gutmann A, Thompson D. Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1996.
Daniels N, Sabin J. Last chance therapies and managed care: pluralism, fair procedures, and legitimacy. Phil and Pub Affairs 26; 1997: 303–350.
Rorty R. The banality of pragmatism and the poetry of justice. So Cal Law J 1990; 63: 1811–1820.
Rawls J. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press, 1993.
London AJ. The Independence of practical ethics. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics (this issue).
Dewey J, Tufts JH. Ethics, 1st edn New York: Holt.
Radin MJ. Contested Commodities. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1996.
Jonsen A, Toulmin S. The Abuse of Casuistry. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988.
Beauchamp T, Childress J. Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 4th edn New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.
Posner R. The Problematics of Moral and Legal Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Arras, J.D. Freestanding Pragmatism in Law and Bioethics. Theor Med Bioeth 22, 69–85 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011495624471
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011495624471