Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A comparison of principle-based and case-based approaches to ethical analysis

  • Articles
  • Published:
HEC Forum Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Jonsen AR. The birth of bio ethics.Hastings Center Report (Supplement). 1993; 23(1): S1-S4.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Beauchamp TL. Principles and other emerging paradigms in bioethics.Indiana Law Journal. 1994; 69(4): 955–71.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kuczewski MG. Casuistry and communitarian critics.Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal. 1994; 4(2): 99–116.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Clouser KD, Gert B. A critique of principlism.Journal of Medicine and Philosophy. 1990; 15(2): 219–36.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Arras JD. Principles and particularity: The role of cases in bioethics.Indiana Law Journal. 1994; 69(4): 983–1014.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Toulmin S. The tyranny of principles.Hastings Center Report. 1981; 11(6): 31–39.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dworkin RB. Emerging paradigms in bioethics: Introduction.Indiana Law Journal. 1994; 69(4): 945–54.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Williams SH. Bioethics and epistemology: A response to Professor Arras.Indiana Law Journal. 1994; 69(4): 1021–26.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zimbelman J. Good life, good death, and the right to die: Ethical considerations for decisions at the end of life.Journal of Professional Nursing. 1994; 10(6): 22–37.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pearlman RA. Ethics Committees. In Jonsen, AR (ed.)Health Care Ethics. (August) 1994; Seminar conducted at the University of Washington, Seattle, WA.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jonsen AR. Practice versus theory.Hastings Center Report. 1990; 20: 32–34.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF.Principles of Biomedical Ethics (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Meyers DT. The socialized individual and individual autonomy. In Kittay EF, Meyers DT (eds.)Women and Moral Theory. Savage, MD: Rowman and Littlefield; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pellegrino ED. The relationship of autonomy and integrity in medical ethics.Bulletin of the Pan American Health Organization. 1990; 24(4): 361–71.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jonsen AR, Toulmin S.The Abuse of Casuistry. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Meyers D.Self, Society, and Personal Choices. New York, NY: Columbia University Press; 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Stark W. Casuistry.Dictionary of the History of Ideas. New York: Scribners; 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Jonsen AR, Siegler M, Winslade W.Clinical Ethics (3rd ed.) New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Inc.; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Baier A. The need for more than justice.Canadian Journal of Philosophy. 1986; 13 (Supplement): 41–56.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Arras JD. Getting down to cases: The revival of casuistry in bioethics.Journal of Medicine and Philosophy. 1991; 16: 29–51.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Jecker NS. Ethical principles in health care. In Jonsen, AR.Health Care Ethics. August, 1994; Seminar conducted at the University of Washington, Seattle, WA.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Jecker NS, Self DJ. Separating care and cure: An analysis of historical and contemporary images of nursing and medicine.Journal of Medicine and Philosophy. 1991; 16(3): 285–305.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sherwin S.No Longer Patient. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Carse AL. The ‘voice of care’: Implications for bioethical education.Journal of Medicine and Philosophy. 1991; 16(1): 5–28.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Schneider CE. Bioethics with a human face.Indiana Law Journal. 1994; 69(4): 1075–1104.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Kathryn E. Artnak R.N., M.S.N.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Artnak, K.E. A comparison of principle-based and case-based approaches to ethical analysis. HEC Forum 7, 339–352 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01789034

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01789034

Keywords

Search

Navigation