Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Is Health Inequality Across Individuals of Moral Concern?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Health Care Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The history of the documentation of health inequality is long. The way in which health inequality has customarily been documented is by comparing differences in the average health across groups, for example, by sex or gender, income, education, occupation, or geographic region. In the controversial World Health Report 2000, researchers at the World Health Organization criticized this traditional practice and proposed to measure health inequality across individuals irrespective of individuals’ group affiliation. They defended its proposal on the moral grounds without clear explanation. In this paper I ask: is health inequality across individuals of moral concern, and, if so, why? Clarification of these questions is crucial for meaningful interpretation of health inequality measured across individuals. Only if there was something morally problematic in health inequality across individuals, its reduction would be good news. Specifically, in this paper I provide three arguments for the moral significance of health inequality across individuals: (a) health is special, (b) health equity plays an important and unique role in the general pursuit of justice, and (c) health inequality is an indicator of general injustice in society. I then discuss three key questions to examine the validity of these arguments: (i) how special is health?, (ii) how good is health as an indicator?, and (iii) what do we mean by injustice? I conclude that health inequality across individuals is of moral interest with the arguments (b) and (c).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The WHO researchers throughout this paper are the health inequality team for the production of The World Health Report 2000 [47] in Evidence and Information for Policy, the WHO headquarters.

  2. In this paragraph, I follow an excellent summary of philosophical discussion on equality by Hausman and McPherson [25, pp.135–149].

  3. For example, Dworkin does not include health or health care in his list of resources to be equalized. In his view, we should equalize income (and other resources) so people can buy health insurance according to their life plans [30, 36].

  4. Two scholars independently developed a so-called capability approach, albeit following a period of collaboration. As is well known, Amartya Sen fashioned the idea of capability in development economics [40, 41], and, Martha Nussbaum in philosophy [33]. When working together in 1980s, they recognized a “striking resemblance” in each other’s idea [33, p. 11]. Their ideas were, however, not identical and did not merge after that collaborative period. Sen is deliberately ambiguous about of what capabilities consisting, and therefore, it is unclear if he would include health in a capability set and if he would also agree to separate health from a capability set and independently examine its distribution. For this reason, it is Nussbaum’s version of the capability approach on which I focus here.

  5. A word of caution is in order regarding the interpretation of this basic minimum. Nussbaum favours its recognition with “reference to an idea of human worth or dignity,” instead of the literal interpretation that below it people are better off if dead [33, p. 73].

  6. Due to the lack of data, the WHO researchers only examined individual health inequality among children aged five or younger. For the purpose of the discussion in this paragraph, I assume that individual health inequality for this particular age group is the same as individual health inequality for the entire population.

Abbreviations

WHO:

World Health Organization

References

  1. Anand S (2002) The concern for equity in health. J Epidemiol Community Health 56:485–487

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Antonovsky A (1967) Social class, life expectancy and overall mortality. Milbank Mem Fund Q 45:31–73

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Arneson R (1989) Equality and equal opportunity for welfare. Philos Stud 56:77–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Asada Y, Hedemann T (2002) A problem with the individual approach in the WHO health inequality measurement. Int J Equity Health 1:1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Asada Y, Ohkusa Y (2004) Analysis of health-related quality of life (HRQL), its distribution, and its distribution by income in Japan, 1989 and 1998. Soc Sci Med 59:1423–1433

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Badgley R (1991) Socio and economic disparities under canadian health care. Int J Health Serv 21:659–671

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Black D (2000) Working together for equity. Health Econ 9:567–568

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Braveman P, Tarimo E (2002) Social inequalities in health within countries: not only an issue for affluent nations. Soc Sci Med 54:1621–1635

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Braveman P, Gruskin S (2003) Defining equity in health. J Epidemiol Community Health 57:254–258

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Brock DW (2000) Broadening the bioethics agenda. Kennedy Inst Ethics J 10:21–38

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Clarke PM, Gerdtham U-G, Connelly LB (2003) A note on the decomposition of the health concentration index. Health Econ 12:511–516

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Culyer AJ (2001). Equity - some theory and its policy implications. J Med Ethics 27:275–283

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Dahlgren G, Whitehead M (1991) Policies and strategies to promote social equality in health. Institute of Future Studies, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  14. Daniels N (1985) Just health care. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  15. Daniels N, Kennedy B, Kawachi I (2000) Is inequality bad for our health? Beacon Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  16. Deaton A (2002) Policy implications of the gradient of health and wealth. Health Aff 21:13–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Dworkin R (1981) What is equality? Part 1: Equality of welfare. Philos Public Aff 10:185–246

    Google Scholar 

  18. Dworkin R (1981) What is equality? Part 2: Equality of resources. Philos Public Aff 10:283–345

    Google Scholar 

  19. Evans RG, Barer ML, Marmor TR (1994) Why are some people healthy and others not? In: Evans RG, Barer ML, Marmor TR (eds) The determinants of health of populations. Aldine De Gruyter, New York

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gakidou E, King G (2002) Measuring total health inequality: adding individual variation to group-level differences. Int J Equity Health 1:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gakidou EE, Murray CJL, Frenk J (2000) Defining and measuring health inequality: An approach based on the distribution of health expectancy. Bull World Health Org 78:42–54

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Gosepath S (2001) Equality. In: Zalta EN (ed) The stanford encyclopaedia of philosophy. Available at http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/equality/, last accessed March 24, 2005

  23. Hausman D, Asada Y, Hedemann T (2002) Health inequalities and why they matter. Health Care Anal 10:177–191

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hausman D (2003) The injustice of health inequalities, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, unpublished manuscript

  25. Hausman DM, McPherson MS (1996) Economic analysis and moral philosophy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hausman DM (forthcoming) Equality versus priority: A badly misleading distinction. In: Wikler D (ed) Choosing interventions: Fairness and goodness. The World Health Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  27. Jefferson T (1787) To T. M. Randolph, Jr. (Paris). In Foley JP (ed) The Jeffersonian Cyclopaedia: A comprehensive collection of the views of Thomas Jefferson (1900). Funk and Wagnells Company, New York and London. Available at http://etext.lib.virginia.edu/jefferson/quotations/foley/, last accessed March 24, 2005

  28. Kawachi I, Subramanian SV, Almeida-Filho N (2002) A glossary for health inequalities. J Epidemiol Community Health 56:647–652

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Lahelma E, Kivela K, Roos E, Tuominen T, Dahl E, Diderichsen F, Elstad JI, Lissau I, Lundberg O, Rahkonen O, Rasmussen NK, Yngwe MA (2002) Analysing changes of health inequalities in the Nordic Welfare States. Soc Sci Med 55:609–625

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Marchand S, Wikler D, Landesman B (1998) Class, health, and justice. Milbank Q 76:449–467

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Murray CJL, Gakidou EE, Frenk J (1999) Health inequalities and social group differences: What should we measure? Bull World Health Organ 77:537–543

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Murray CJL, Gakidou EE, Frenk J (2000) Response to P. Braveman et al. Bull World Health Organ 78:234

    Google Scholar 

  33. Nussbaum MC (2000) Women and human development: The capabilities approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  34. Pereira J (1993) What does equity in health mean? J Soc Policy 22:19–48

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Peter F (2001) Health equity and social justice. J Appl Philos 18:159–170

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Peter F, Evans T (2001) Ethical dimensions of health equity. In: Evans T, Whitehead M, Diderichsen F, Bhuiya A, Wirth M (eds) Challenging inequalities in health: From ethics to action. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 25–33

    Google Scholar 

  37. Powers M, Faden R (2000) Inequalities in health, inequalities in health care: Four generations of discussion about justice and cost-effectiveness analysis. Kennedy Inst Ethics J 10:109–127

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Pradhan M, Sahn DE, Younger SD (2003) Decomposing world health inequality. J Health Econ 22:271–293

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Rawls J (1971) A theory of justice. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  40. Sen A (1992) Inequality reexamined. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  41. Sen A (1993) Capability and well-being. In: Nussbaum M, Sen A (eds) The quality of life. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 30–66

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  42. Sen A (1998). Mortality as an indicator of economic success and failure. Econ J 108:1–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Sen A (2002) Why health equity? Health Econ 11:659–666

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Shibuya K, Hashimoto H, Yano E (2002) Individual income, income distribution, and self rated health in japan: Cross sectional analysis of nationally representative sample. BMJ 324:16–19

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Starfield B (2002) Equity in health. J Epidemiol Community Health 56:483–484

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. The Feminist Health Care Ethics Research Network, Sherwin S, Baylis F, Bell M, Koninck MD, Downie J, Lippman A, Lock M, Mitchinson W, Morgan MP, Mosher J, Parish B (1998) The politics of women’s health. Temple University Press, Philadelphia

  47. The World Health Organization (2000) The world health report 2000: Health systems: improving performance. The World Health Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  48. Tobin J (1970) On limiting the domain of inequality. J Law Econ 13:263–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Wagstaff A, van Doorslaer E (2004) Overall versus socioeconomic health inequality: A measurement framework and two empirical illustrations. Health Econ 13:297–301

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Walzer M (1983) Spheres of justice. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  51. Whitehead M (1992) The concepts and principles of equity and health. Int J Health Serv 22:429–445

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Wilkinson RG (1996) Unhealthy societies: The afflictions of inequality. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  53. Woodward A, Kawachi I (2000) Why reduce health inequalities? J Epidemiol Community Health 54:923–929

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Young IM (2001) Equality of whom? Social groups and judgments of injustice. J Pol Philos 9:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I am indebted to Drs. David Kindig, John Mullahy, Patrick Remington, Alberto Palloni, Daniel Hausman, and Daniel Wikler for their general assistance for my dissertation, from which this present paper was derived. I am also grateful to Drs. Nuala Kenny and Susan Sherwin and reviewers for their comments on an earlier version of the manuscript. All remaining errors are mine. This project was supported by grant number 1 R03 HS 13116 from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and the Canadian Institute of Health Research Training Program for Ethics and Health Policy and Research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yukiko Asada.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Asada, Y. Is Health Inequality Across Individuals of Moral Concern?. Health Care Anal 14, 25–36 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-006-0008-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-006-0008-6

Keywords

Navigation