Skip to main content
Log in

Online-Based Approaches to Identify Real Journals and Publishers from Hijacked Ones

  • Opinion
  • Published:
Science and Engineering Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of the present paper was to introduce some online-based approaches to evaluate scientific journals and publishers and to differentiate them from the hijacked ones, regardless of their disciplines. With the advent of open-access journals, many hijacked journals and publishers have deceitfully assumed the mantle of authenticity in order to take advantage of researchers and students. Although these hijacked journals and publishers can be identified through checking their advertisement techniques and their websites, these ways do not always result in their identification. There exist certain online-based approaches, such as using Master Journal List provided by Thomson Reuters, and Scopus database, and using the DOI of a paper, to certify the realness of a journal or publisher. It is indispensable that inexperienced students and researchers know these methods so as to identify hijacked journals and publishers with a higher level of probability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bailey, C. W., Jr. (2005). Open access bibliography: liberating scholarly literature with e-prints and open access journals (p. 2005). Washington, DC: Association of Research Libraries.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esfe, M. H., Wongwises, S., Asadi, A., & Akbari, M. (2015). Fake journals: Their features and some viable ways to distinguishing them. Science and Engineering Ethics, 21(4), 821–824. doi:10.1007/s11948-014-9595-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jalalian, M., & Mahboobi, H. (2014). Hijacked journals and predatory publishers: Is there a need to re-think how to assess the quality of academic research? Walailak J Sci and Tech, 11(5), doi:10.14456/WJST.2014.16.

  • Moustafa, K. (2015). Fake journals: Not always valid ways to distinguish them. Science and engineering ethics, 21(5), 1391–1392. doi:10.1007/s11948-014-9608-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Noorden, R. (2013). The true cost of science publishing. Nature, 495(7442), 426–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The first author would like to acknowledge the Young Researchers and Elite club, Semnan branch, Islamic Azad University and the Semnan Science and Technology Park for “ADVANCE RESEARCH” courses and also experss his deepest gratitude to Professor Mohammad Hemmat Esfe for his viable and practical "ADVANCE RESEARCH" courses.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amin Asadi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Asadi, A., Rahbar, N., Asadi, M. et al. Online-Based Approaches to Identify Real Journals and Publishers from Hijacked Ones. Sci Eng Ethics 23, 305–308 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-015-9747-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-015-9747-9

Keywords

Navigation