Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Action theory as a resource for decision theory

  • Published:
Theory and Decision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Audi, R.: 1972, ‘The Concept of Believing’, The Personalist 53, 43–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audi, R.: 1973, ‘The Concept of Wanting’, Philosophical Studies 24, 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audi, R.: 1982, ‘Believing and Affirming’, Mind 91, 115–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audi, R.: 1985a, ‘Rationality and Valuation’, in G. Seebass and R. Tuomela (eds.), Social Action (Theory and Decision Library, vol. 43), D. Reidel, Dordrecht and Boston, 243–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audi, R.: 1985b, ‘Rationalization and Rationality’, Synthese 65, 157–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brand, M.: 1984, Intending and Acting, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandt, R. B.: 1979, A Theory of the Good and the Right, The Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandt, R. B.: 1983, ‘The Concept of Rational Action’, Social Theory and Practice 9, 143–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman, C. W.: 1970, ‘Kant - A Decision Theorist?’, Theory and Decision 1, 107–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L. J.: 1981, ‘Can Human Rationality be Experimentally Demonstrated?’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4, 317–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hempel, C. G.: 1965, Aspects of Scientific Explanation, The Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyburgh, H. E.: 1983a, Epistemology and Inference, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyburgh, H. E.: 1983b, ‘Rational Belief’, Behavior and Brain Sciences 6, 231–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leinfellner, W.: 1978, ‘Marx and the Utility Approach to the Ethical Foundation of Microeconomics’, in H. W. Goettinger and W. Leinfellner (eds.), Decision Theory and Social Ethics, Issues in Social Choice, D. Reidel, Dordrecht and Boston, pp. 33–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, J.: forthcoming, The Ways of Desire, Precedent Publishing Co., Chicago.

  • Samuelson, P. A.: 1963, ‘Risk and Uncertainty: A Fallacy of Large Numbers’, Scientia 98, 108–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schank, R. and R. Abelson: 1977, Script, Plans, Goals and Understanding, Lawrence Earlbaum, Hilsdale, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A. and D. Kahneman: 1981, ‘The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice’, Science 211, 453–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weirich, P.: (forthcoming), ‘Expected Utility and Risk’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Philosophy, University of Nebraska, 68588-0321, Lincoln, NE, USA

    Robert Audi

Authors
  1. Robert Audi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Audi, R. Action theory as a resource for decision theory. Theor Decis 20, 207–221 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00134039

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00134039

Keywords

Search

Navigation