Skip to main content
Log in

Revealed Preferences in Intertemporal Decision Making

  • Published:
Theory and Decision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

REFERENCES

  • Arrow, K.J. (1959), Rational choice functions and orderings, Economica 26, 121-127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandyopadhyay, T. and Sengupta K. (1991), Revealed preference axioms for rational choice, Economic Journal 101, 202-213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houthakker, H.S. (1950), Revealed preference and the utility function, Economica 17, 159-174.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClennen, E.F. (1990), Rationality and Dynamic Choice Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richter, M.K. (1966), Revealed preference theory, Econometrica 34, 635-645.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P.A. (1938), A note on the pure theory of consumers' behaviour, Economica 5, 61-71, 353-354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A.K. (1971), Choice functions and revealed preference, Review of Economic Studies 38, 307-317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strotz, R.H. (1955/1956), Myopia and inconsistency in dynamic utility maximization, Review of Economic Studies 23(3), 165-180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uzawa, H. (1956), A note on preference and axioms of choice, Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics 8, 35-40.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Auer, L. (1998), Dynamic preferences, choice mechanisms, and welfare. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, Vol. 462 Springer, Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Auer, L. (1999), Dynamic choice mechanisms, Theory and Decision 46, 291-308.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Auer, L.V. Revealed Preferences in Intertemporal Decision Making. Theory and Decision 56, 269–290 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-004-7522-5

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-004-7522-5

Navigation