Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Evaluating the effectiveness of bioethics education through quality standards and indicators

  • Published:
International Journal of Ethics Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bioethics education has remarkably grown across the globe in the last few decades. The data of the UNESCO Global Ethics Observatory proves that bioethics education is a global phenomenon with various bioethics institutions, teaching programs, and academicians. However, this situation does not mean that bioethics education has reached a stable and flawless level. Especially, the effectiveness of bioethics programs or their quality assessment is a major area that should be analyzed through more academic works. For filling that gap, this article aims to formulate a general framework to address the quality standards and indicators in bioethics education. The article adapts Donabedian’s three approaches—structure, process, and outcome— as three levels to measure quality in bioethics education. The proposed model considers the indicators the ultimate quantifiable points by creating a sequential classification as the three levels, main categories, standards, and indicators, which means that it applies an inductive approach following a path from the indicators to the standards, from the standards to the main categories, and from the main categories to the levels in order to reach a conclusion about the effectiveness of each level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ainscow, Mel, and David Hopkins. 2016. Improving the quality of education for all. In Struggle for Equality in Education: The selected works of Mel Ainscow, ed. Mel Ainscow, 57–69. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Assaf, A.F. 1993. Outcome management and TQ. In The textbook of total quality in healthcare, ed. A.F. Al-Assaf and June A. Schmele, 221–237. Delray Beach: St. Lucie Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Antes, A.L., Stephen T. Murphy, Ethan P. Waples, Michael D. Mumford, Ryan P. Brown, Shane Connelly, and Lynn D. Devenport. 2009. A meta-analysis of ethics instruction effectiveness in the sciences. Ethics and Behavior 19: 379–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, Robert M., Lachlan Forrow, Steven A. Wartman, and Joan Teno. 1988. Teaching clinical medical ethics: a model programme for primary care residency. Journal of Medical Ethics 14: 91–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avci, Ercan. 2017a. A normative analysis to determine the goals of ethics education through utilizing three approaches: rational moral education, ethical acculturation, and learning throughout life. International Journal of Ethics Education 2: 125–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avci, Ercan. 2017b. Learning from experiences to determine quality in ethics education. International Journal of Ethics Education 2: 3–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Begley, Ann M. 2006. Facilitating the development of moral insight in practice: teaching ethics and teaching virtue. Nursing Philosophy 7: 257–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, Brian, Emilene Coventry, Nicola Greenway, and Mark Minchin. 2014. The NICE process for developing quality standards and indicators. Zeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen (ZEFQ) 108: 481–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewin, T.B. 1993. How much ethics is needed to make a good doctor? The Lancet 341: 161–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callahan, Callahan. 1980. Goals in the teaching of ethics. In Ethics teaching in higher education, ed. Danial Callahan and Sissela Bok, 61–80. New York: Plenum Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Yin Cheong, and Wai Ming Tam. 1997. Multi-models of quality in education. Quality Assurance in Education 5: 22–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donabedian, Avedis. 1968. The evaluation of medical care programs. Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine 44: 117–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donabedian, Avedis. 1988. Quality assessment and assurance: Unity of purpose, diversity of means. Inquiry 25: 173–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donabedian, Avedis. 2003. In An introduction to quality assurance in health care, ed. Rashid Bashshur. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donabedian, Avedis. 2005. Evaluation the quality of medical care. The Milbank Quarterly 83: 691–729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, James R., and William M. Lindsay. 2005. An introduction to six sigma & process improvement. South-Western: Harrisonburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilpatrick, Eleanor. 1999. Quality improvement projects in health care. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glick, Shimon M. 1994. The teaching of medical ethics to medical students. Journal of Medical Ethics 20: 239–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, Lee, and Diana Green. 1993. Defining quality. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 18: 9–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoff, Kathryn S. 1999. Leaders and managers: Essential skills required within higher education. Higher Education 38: 311–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Institute of Medicine. 1990. In Medicare: A strategy for quality assurance Volume I, ed. Kathleen N. Lohr. Washington D.C: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonsen, Albert R. 1989. Medical ethics teaching programs at the University of California, San Francisco, and the University of Washington. Academic Medicine: 718–722.

  • Juran, J.M. 1988. Juran on planning for quality. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juran, J.M. 1989. Juran on leadership for quality. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juran, J.M., and Frank M. Gryna. 1993. Quality planning and analysis. New York; St. Louis; San Francisco: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, M.J., Hugh P. McKenna, and S. Ketefian. 2006. Global quality criteria, standards, and indicators for doctoral programs in nursing; literature review and guideline development. International Journal of Nursing Studies 43: 477–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Lisa M., and Frances A. McCarty. 2016. Emergence of a discipline? Growth in U.S. postsecondary bioethics degrees. Hastings Center Report: 19–21.

  • Legido-Quigley, Helena, Martin McKee, Ellen Nolte, and Irene A. Glinos. 2008. Assuring the quality of health care in the European Union: A Case for action. Cornwall: MPG Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Benfu. 2000. Ethics teaching in medical schools. Hastings Center Report: S30–S32.

  • Mumford, Michael D., Logan Steele, and Logan L. Watts. 2015. Evaluating ethics education programs: a multilevel approach. Ethics & Behavior 25: 37–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng, Pak Tee. 2015. What is quality education? How can it be achieved? The perspectives of school middle leaders in Singapore. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability: 1–16.

  • Ormiston, David, Alphonse Gilbert, and Robert E. Manning. 1998. Indicators and standards of quality for ski resort management. Journal of Travel Research 36: 35–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owlia, Mohammad S., and Elaine M. Aspinwall. 1996. A Framework for the dimensions of quality in higher education. Quality Assurance in Education 4: 12–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues. 2016. Bioethics for every generation: Deliberation and education in health, science, and technology. Washington D.C: Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saini, Sameer D., Akbar K. Waljee, Philip Schoenfeld, Eve A. Kerr, and Sandeep Vijan. 2014. The increasing importance of quality measures for trainees. Gastroenterology 147: 725–729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, Charles D., and Isuf Kalo. 2002. A background for national quality policies in health systems. Copenhagen: World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sims, Ronald R. 2002. Teaching business ethics for effective learning. Westport: Quorum Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ten Have, Henk. 2015. Globalization of bioethics education. In Bioethics education in a global perspective - challenges in global bioethics, ed. Henk ten Have, 2–7. New York; London: Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ten Have, Henk. 2018. Cosmopolitanism and educating the citizen of the world. In Global education in bioethics, ed. Henk ten Have, 14–18. Cham: Springer International Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • The Hastings Center. 1976. The Teaching of bioethics. New York: The Hastings Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tricker, Ray, and Bruce Sherring-Lucas. 2005. ISO 9001:2000 in Brief, second edition. In Oxford. Burlington: Elsevier Butterwort-Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. 2004. EFA global monitoring report 2005: Education for all the quality imperative, 2004. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. 2008. Bioethics core curriculum: section 1: Syllabus ethics education programme. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. 2011. Bioethics core curriculum: section 2: Study materials ethics education programme, 2011. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. n.d. Global Ethics Observatory (GEObs). http://www.unesco.org/new/en/social-and-human-sciences/themes/global-ethics- observatory/. Accessed September 1, 2021.

  • Veatch, Robert M. 1976. Preface to the teaching of bioethics. New York: The Hastings Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zais, Mick. n.d. South Carolina academic standards and performance indicators for science. Columbia: South Carolina Department of Education. https://ed.sc.gov/scdoe/assets/file/agency/ccr/Standards-Learning/documents/South_Carolina_Academic_Standards_and_Performance_Indicators_for_Science_2014.pdf. Accessed September 1, 2021.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Grefenstette Center for Ethics in Science, Technology, and Law, Duquesne University, 600 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, 15828, USA

    Ercan Avci

Authors
  1. Ercan Avci
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ercan Avci.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

ESM 1

(DOCX 65 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Avci, E. Evaluating the effectiveness of bioethics education through quality standards and indicators. International Journal of Ethics Education 7, 5–19 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40889-021-00132-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40889-021-00132-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation