Skip to main content
Log in

Research with a Purpose: A Reply to My Critics

  • Book Review Symposium
  • Published:
Human Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Baert, P. (2005). Philosophy of the social sciences: Towards pragmatism. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baert, P. (2008). Pragmatism misunderstood: A reply to Peter Manicas. Journal of Critical Realism, 7(2), 246–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baert, P. (2009). A neo-pragmatist agenda for social research: Integrating Levinas, Gadamer and Mead. In H. Bauer & E. Brighi (Eds.), Pragmatism in international relations (pp. 44–62). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baert, P., & Dominguez Rubio, F. (2009). Philosophy of the social sciences. In B. S. Turner (Ed.), Blackwell companion to social theory (pp. 60–80). Oxford: Blackwell/Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (1989). Modernity and the holocaust. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1930). The Quest for certainty: A study of the relation of knowledge and action. New York: Minton, Balch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2007). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manicas, P. (2008a). Rescuing Dewey: Essays in pragmatic naturalism. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manicas, P. (2008b). Postmodern pragmatism and social science. Journal of Critical Realism, 7(2), 236–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, P. (2003). Mistakes. Synthese, 136, 389–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, P. (2004). Hearth of darkness: “Perpetrator history” and why there is no why. History of the Human Sciences, 17(2/3), 211–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, S. (1994). The social theory of practices: Tradition, tacit knowledge, and presuppositions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrick Baert.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baert, P. Research with a Purpose: A Reply to My Critics. Hum Stud 32, 391–400 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-009-9128-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-009-9128-y

Navigation