Abstract
The prominent characteristic of a delayed-choice effect is to make the choice between complementary types of phenomena after the relevant interaction between the system and measuring instrument has already come to an end. In this paper, we first represent a detailed comparative analysis of some early delayed-choice propositions and also most of the experimentally performed delayed-choice proposals in a coherent and unified quantum mechanical formulation. Taking into the account the represented quantum mechanical descriptions and also the rules of probability theory, we discuss that there are two fundamentally different descriptions concerning the physical mechanism of the delayed-choice between the complementary types of phenomena in these experiments. In this regard, we finally conclude that the delayed-choice experiments can be classified into two main groups where the temporal aspect of each group is characterized differently within their probabilistic descriptions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bohr, N.: In: Wheeler, J.A., Zurek, W.H. (eds.) Quantum Theory and Measurement, pp. 9–49. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1984)
Wheeler, J.A.: In: Marlow, A.R. (ed.) Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Theory. Academic Press, New York (1978)
Bohm, D., et al.: A quantum potential approach to the wheeler delayed-choice experiment. Nature 315, 294–297 (1985)
Hiley, B.J., et al.: Delayed-choice experiments and the Bohm approach. Phys. Scr. 74, 336–348 (2006)
Griffiths, R.B.: Consistent Quantum Theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002)
Griffiths, R.B.: Consistent histories and quantum delayed choice. Fortsch. Phys. 46 (1999)
Schrodinger, E.: The present situation in quantum mechanics. In: Wheeler, J.A., Zurek, W.H. (eds.) Quantum Theory and Measurement, p. 152. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1984). Translated
von Weizsäcker, C.F.: The Structure of Physics. Springer, Berlin (2006). pp. 280–291
Bartell, L.S.: Complementarity in the double-slit experiment: on simple realizable systems for observing intermediate particle-wave behavior. Phys. Rev. D 21, 1698–1699 (1980)
Scully, M.O., Zubairy, M.S.: Quantum Optics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1997). Chapt. 20
Parkins, A.S., et al.: Quantum-state mapping between multilevel atoms and cavity light fields. Phys. Rev. A 51, 1578–1596 (1995)
Bramon, A., et al.: Quantum marking and quantum erasure for neutral kaons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 020405 (2004)
Hellmut, T., et al.: Delayed-choice experiments in quantum interference. Phys. Rev. A 72, 2532–2541 (1987)
Baldzuhn, J., et al.: A wave-particle delayed-choice experiment with a single-photon state. Z. Phys. B 77, 347 (1989)
Kwiat, P., et al.: Delayed choice quantum eraser—theory and experiment. In: Proceedings of 5th European Quantum Electronics Conference, pp. 122–122 (1994)
Herzog, T., et al.: Complementarity and the quantum eraser. Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 3034–3037 (1995)
Kawai, T., et al.: Development of cold neutron pulser for delayed choice experiment. Nucl. Inst. Meth. A 410, 259 (1998)
Kim, Y.-H., et al.: A delayed choice quantum eraser. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 001 (2000)
Walborn, S.P., et al.: Double-slit quantum eraser. Phys. Rev. A 65, 033818 (2002)
Jacques, V., et al.: Experimental realization of Wheeler’s delayed-choice GedankenExperiment. Science 315, 966 (2007)
Durr, S., Rempe, G.: Complementarity and quantum erasure in an atom interferometer. Opt. Commun. 179, 323 (2000)
Englert, B.-G.: Fringe visibility and which-way information: an inequality. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 2154–2157 (1996)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bahrami, M., Shafiee, A. Postponing the Past: An Operational Analysis of Delayed-Choice Experiments. Found Phys 40, 55 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-009-9375-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-009-9375-9