Skip to main content
Log in

Sub specie universitatis

  • Published:
Topoi Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As a contribution to the debate on the future of philosophy as an autonomous discipline beyond its current function within Western-type universities, a comparison is offered between three diverging strategies of “speaking the universal” which keep their relevance today; the “Double Truth” strategy for secular tolerance, illustrated by Spinoza and Wittgenstein; the construction of the universal as “hegemony,” analyzed by Hegel and Marx in terms of collective consciousnesses or ideologies; and the program of generalized translation as it emerges from the critique of traditional “paradoxes of the untranslatable” in the works of contemporary socio-linguists and pragmatic philosophers. The conclusion remains an open questioning on the equivocity of the universal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Balibar E (2002) Ambiguous universality, reprinted as chapter 8 in Politics and the other scene. Verso, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Balibar E (2004) Europe as Borderland, The Alexander von Humboldt Lecture in Human Geography, University of Nijmegen, November 10, 2004 (French version in Europe Constitution Frontière. Editions du passant, Bordeaux 2005)

  • Z Bauman (1999) In search of politics Stanford University Press Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler J (2000) Restaging the universal. Hegemony and the limits of formalism. In: Butler J, Laclau E, ŽiŽek S (eds) Contingency, hegemony, universality. Contemporary dialogues on the left. Verso, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassin B (2004) Vocabulaire européen des philosophies, Seuil/Le Robert, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida (1987) Towers of Babel (Originally published 1985). In: Derrida Psyché: Inventions de l’autre. Galilée, Paris

  • Laugier S (1992) L’anthropologie logique de Quine. L’apprentissage de l’obvie. Vrin, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Lecercle (2004) Une philosophie marxiste du langage. Presses universitaires de France, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • JF Lyotard (1988) The differend. Phrases in dispute University of Minnesota Press Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • Maniglier P (2000) L’humanisme interminable de Claude Lévi-Strauss. Les Temps Modernes 609:216–241

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohji K, Xifaras M (1999) Éprouver l’universel. Essai de geophilosophie. KimÉ, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine WVO (1960) Word and Object. MIT Press, Cambridge (MA)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur P (2004) Sur la traduction. Bayard, Paris

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Etienne Balibar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Balibar, E. Sub specie universitatis. Topoi 25, 3–16 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-006-0001-6

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-006-0001-6

Keywords

Navigation