Abstract
This paper argues that the best interpretation of Ronald Dworkin’s hypothetical insurance scheme is a holistic one that allows the parties to make choices between the policies that are available. This interpretation contrasts with the hypothecated and insurance-focused aspects that are traditionally understood as part of the procedure. The paper argues that the holistic interpretation better fits with the ideal of resource egalitarianism that people should have as much choice as possible from an equal starting point. It does so by allowing people a choice over the policies that will be used to achieve their insurance preferences.
Acknowledgments
Thanks for comments on the ideas in this paper provided by anonymous referees, Matthew Clayton, Andrew Reeve, Stephanie Rinaldi, Liam Shields, Zosia Stemplowska and Adam Switft.
References
Akerlof, George A., “The Economics of ‘Tagging’ as Applied to the Optimal Income Tax, Welfare Programs, and Manpower Planning”, The American Economic Review, 68/1 (1978), 8–19.10.1017/CBO9780511609381.004Search in Google Scholar
Anderson, Elizabeth, “What Is the Point of Equality?” Ethics, 109/2 (1999), 287–337.10.4324/9780429498190-4Search in Google Scholar
Andrews, William D., “The Accessions Tax Proposal”, Tax Law Review, 22 (1966), 589–634.Search in Google Scholar
Arneson, Richard J., “Equality and Equal Opportunity for Welfare”, Philosophical Studies, 56 (1989), 158–94.10.4324/9781315199795-9Search in Google Scholar
Arneson, Richard J., “Liberalism, Distributive Subjectivism, and Equal Opportunity for Welfare”, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 19/2 (1990), 158–94.Search in Google Scholar
Bamford, Douglas, Rethinking Taxation: An Introduction to Hourly Averaging (London: Searching Finance, 2014).Search in Google Scholar
Baumol, William J. and Fischer, Dietrich, Superfairness: Applications and Theory (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1986).Search in Google Scholar
Bickenbach, Jerome, “Disability, Non-talent and Distributive Justice”, in Kristjana Kristiansen, Tom Shakespeare, and Simo Vehmas (eds.), Arguing about Disability: Philosophy Meets Disability Studies (New York, NY: Routledge, 2008), 105–23.Search in Google Scholar
Brennan, Geoffrey and Buchanan, James M., The Power to Tax: Analytical Foundations of a Fiscal Constitution (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980).Search in Google Scholar
Clayton, Matthew, “The Resources of Liberal Equality”, Imprints, 5 (2000), 63–82.Search in Google Scholar
Clayton, Matthew, Justice and Legitimacy in Upbringing (Oxford; New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2006).10.1093/0199268940.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Clayton, Matthew, “Equal Inheritance: An Anti-Perfectionist View”, in Cunliffe John and Erreygers Guido (eds.), Inherited Wealth, Justice and Equality (London: Routledge, 2012), 98–118.10.4324/9780203077993-15Search in Google Scholar
Clayton, Matthew, “Liberal Equality: Political Not Erinacous”, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy (forthcoming).10.1080/13698230.2016.1146307Search in Google Scholar
Clayton, Matthew, “Expensive Tastes Rides Again”, in Burley Justine (ed.), Dworkin and His Critics: With Replies by Dworkin (Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub., 2004).Search in Google Scholar
Cohen, G.A., “On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice”, Ethics, 99/4 (1989), 906–44.10.1086/293126Search in Google Scholar
Cunliffe, John and Erreygers, Guido, The Origins of Universal Grants: An Anthology of Historical Writings on Basic Capital and Basic Income (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004).10.1057/9780230522824Search in Google Scholar
Duhigg, Charles and Bradsher, Keith, “How the U.S. Lost Out on iPhone Work”, New York Times, 2012.Search in Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald, “What Is Equality? Part 2: Equality of Resources”, Philosophy & Public Affairs, 10/4 (1981), 283–345.10.4324/9781315199795-7Search in Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald, “Justice in the Distribution of Health Care”, in Clayton Matthew and Williams Andrew (eds.), The Ideal of Equality (Basingstoke: Macmillan Press, 2000).Search in Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald, Sovereign Virtue (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000).Search in Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald, “Sovereign Virtue Revisited”, Ethics, 113/1 (2002), 106–43.10.1086/341579Search in Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald, Is Democracy Possible Here? (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2006).10.1515/9781400827275Search in Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald, Justice for Hedgehogs (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2011).10.2307/j.ctvjf9vktSearch in Google Scholar
Fleurbaey, Marc, “Equality of Resources Revisited”, Ethics, 113/1 (2002), 82–105.10.1086/341320Search in Google Scholar
Frank, Robert H., “The Demand for Unobservable and Other Nonpositional Goods”, The American Economic Review, 75/1 (1985), 101–16.Search in Google Scholar
Frank, Robert H., “Frames of Reference and the Quality of Life”, The American Economic Review, 79/2 (1989), 80–85.Search in Google Scholar
Frank, Robert H., “Positional Externalities”, in Zeckhauser Richard (ed.), Strategy and Choice (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1991), 25–48.Search in Google Scholar
Frank, Robert H., “Positional Externalities Cause Large and Preventable Welfare Losses”, The American Economic Review, 95/2 (2005), 137–41.10.1257/000282805774670392Search in Google Scholar
Freeman, Samuel, “Equality of Resources, Market Luck, and the Justification of Adjusted Market Distributions”, Boston University Law Review, 90/2 (2010), 921–48.Search in Google Scholar
Gardner, Howard, Frames of Mind: The theory of Multiple Intelligences (New York, NY: Basic Books, 2004).Search in Google Scholar
Goleman, Daniel, Emotional Intelligence: Why It Can Matter More Than IQ (London: Bloomsbury, 1996).Search in Google Scholar
Gomberg, Paul, How to Make Opportunity Equal: Race and Contributive Justice (Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub., 2007).10.1002/9780470692431Search in Google Scholar
Halbach, Edward C. Jr., “An Accessions Tax”, Real Property Probate & Trust Journal, 23 (1988), 211–27.Search in Google Scholar
Hansen, Rasmus, “Equality of Resources and the Problem of Recognition”, Res Publica, 17/2 (2011), 157–74.10.1007/s11158-011-9146-2Search in Google Scholar
Heath, Joseph, “Dworkin’s Auction”, Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 3/3 (2004), 313–35.10.1177/1470594X04046244Search in Google Scholar
Heath, Joseph, “The Benefits of Cooperation”, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 34/4 (2006), 313–51.10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199990481.003.0010Search in Google Scholar
Hirsch, Fred, Social Limits to Growth (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1976).10.4159/harvard.9780674497900Search in Google Scholar
Holmes, Stephen and Sunstein, Cass R., The Cost of Rights: Why Liberty Depends on Taxes (New York, NY: W.W. Norton, 1999).Search in Google Scholar
Krouse, Richard and MacPherson, Michael, “Capitalism, ‘Property-Owning Democracy’, and the Welfare State”, in Amy Gutmann (ed.), Democracy and the Welfare State (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1988), 79–105.10.2307/j.ctv14163mz.9Search in Google Scholar
Macleod, Colin, Liberalism, Justice and Markets (Oxford: OUP, 1998).10.1093/0198293976.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Matsusaka, John G., “Direct Democracy and Fiscal Gridlock: Have Voter Initiatives Paralyzed the California Budget?” State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 5/3 (2005), 248–64.10.1177/153244000500500303Search in Google Scholar
Meade, J.E., Efficiency, Equality, and the Ownership of Property (London: G. Allen & Unwin, 1964).Search in Google Scholar
Mirrlees, James A. and Institute for Fiscal, Studies, Tax by Design: The Mirrlees Review (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).Search in Google Scholar
Murphy, Liam and Nagel, Thomas, The Myth of Ownership: Taxes and Justice (Oxford: OUP, 2002).10.1093/0195150163.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Murphy, Liam and Nagel, Thomas, The Myth of Ownership: Taxes and Justice (Oxford: OUP, 2002).10.1093/0195150163.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Nichols, Albert L. and Zeckhauser, Richard J., “Targeting Transfers through Restrictions on Recipients”, The American Economic Review, 72/2 (1982), 372–77.Search in Google Scholar
O’Neill, Martin and Williamson, Thad, Property-Owning Democracy: Rawls and Beyond (Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012).10.1002/9781444355192Search in Google Scholar
Phelps, Edmund S., Rewarding Work: How to Restore Participation and Self-Support to Free Enterprise (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1997).10.4159/9780674042117Search in Google Scholar
Rawls, John, Political Liberalism (New York, NY: Columbia University Press, 1996).Search in Google Scholar
Rawls, John, A Theory of Justice: Revised Edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999).10.4159/9780674042582Search in Google Scholar
Rawls, John, Justice as Fairness: A Restatement (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001).Search in Google Scholar
Ripstein, Arthur, “Liberty and Equality”, in Arthur Ripstein (ed.), Ronald Dworkin (London: Cambridge University Press, 2007), 82–108.10.1017/CBO9781139167109.004Search in Google Scholar
Rudick, Harry J., “A Proposal for an Accessions Tax”, Tax Law Review, 1/1 (1945), 25–44.Search in Google Scholar
Sandford, Cedric Thomas, et al, An Accessions Tax: A Study of the Desirability and Feasibility of Replacing the United Kingdom Estate Duty by a Cumulative Tax on Recipients of Gifts and Inheritances (London: Institute for Fiscal Studies, 1973).Search in Google Scholar
Scheffler, Samuel, “What Is Egalitarianism?” Philosophy and Public Affairs, 31/1 (2003), 5–39.10.4324/9781315251431-12Search in Google Scholar
Stemplowska, Zofia, “Making Justice Sensitive to Responsibility”, Political Studies, 57/2 (2009), 237–59.10.1111/j.1467-9248.2008.00731.xSearch in Google Scholar
Stemplowska, Zofia, “Responsibility and Respect”, in Knight Carl and Stemplowska Zofia (eds.), Responsibility and Distributive Justice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011), 115–35.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199565801.003.0006Search in Google Scholar
Tremain, Shelley, “Dworkin on Disablement and Resources”, Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence, 9/2 (1996), 343–59.10.1017/S0841820900003489Search in Google Scholar
Van Der Veen, Robert, “Equality of Talent Resources: Procedures or Outcomes?” Ethics, 113/1 (2002), 55–81.10.1086/341321Search in Google Scholar
Van Parijs, Philippe, Real Freedom for All: What (If Anything) Can Justify Capitalism? (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995).Search in Google Scholar
Ventry, Dennis J., “Equity versus Efficiency in Historical Perspective”, in Joseph J. Thorndike and Dennis J. Ventry (eds.), Tax Justice: The Ongoing Debate (Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press, 2002).Search in Google Scholar
Vickrey, William, “Averaging of Income for Income-Tax Purposes”, Journal of Political Economy, 47/3 (1939), 379–97.10.1086/255390Search in Google Scholar
Vickrey, William, Agenda for Progressive Taxation (with a New Introduction (Clifton, NJ: Augustus M. Kelley, 1972).Search in Google Scholar
Williams, Andrew, “Equality for the Ambitious”, Philosophical Quarterly, 52 (2002), 377–89.10.1111/1467-9213.00276Search in Google Scholar
Wolff, Jonathan, “Fairness, Respect, and the Egalitarian Ethos”, Philosophy & Public Affairs, 27/2 (1998), 97–122.10.1111/j.1088-4963.1998.tb00063.xSearch in Google Scholar
Wolff, Jonathan, “Social Justice and Public Policy: A View from Political Philosophy”, in Craig Gary, Burchardt Tania, and Gordon David (eds.), Social Justice and Public Policy (Bristol: Policy Press, 2008), 17–31.10.2307/j.ctt9qgvs3.7Search in Google Scholar
© 2015 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston