Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Cultural identity of the Slovenian countryside: Territorial integrity and cultural diversity from the perspective of rural communities

  • Published:
Agriculture and Human Values Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cultural identity of rural areas is discussed with some basic concepts such as culture, territory, contemporary globalization, and individuation processes. This case study of cultural identity in the Slovenian countryside focuses on its spiritual culture, of which several components are presented in detail: the language of rural areas, (handy)crafts, nutrition and food culture, co-operation and mutual help among rural residents at work and in leisure, and the art products of Slovenian farmers. In discussing the present status and the future of rural cultural identity, the danger of idolizing (romanticizing) traditions for the sake of selling them to tourists is pointed out and the necessity of traditions being part of everyday life of rural residents stressed. As a part of work and leisure life of rural residents, traditions are constantly changing due to local as well as to international socio-economic processes, to inner and outer stimuli to keep existing traditions and to create new ones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adam, F. and G. Tomc (eds.) (1994), Small Societies in Transition. The Case of Slovenia. Družboslovne razprave. Ljubljana: Slovenian Sociological Association and Institute for Social Sciences, No. 15-16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbič, A. (1983), “The farmer-worker in Yugoslavia: A bridge between the city and the countryside,” Sociologia Ruralis1: 76-84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbič, A. (1990), Kmetov vsakdan(Farmers' Everyday Life). Ljubljana, CZ.

  • Barbič, A. (1993), Kmečka družina - socialna sestavina družinske kmetije(Farm Family - the Social Component of a Family Farm). Ljubljana: Družba za razvoj podeželja, d. o. o. (research report).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbič, A. (1995), The Development and Promotion of Tourism on Farms in Slovenia. Joint ECA-ECE Symposium on Rural Tourism. April 2-7, Galilee, Israel, 15 p.

  • Barbič, A. and F. Hribernik (1991), Farm Family. Ljubljana: Biotechnical Faculty, 12 p. (research report).

    Google Scholar 

  • Benedik, F. (1995), “Jezik podeželskih območij - izraz slovenske samobitnosti (The language of rural areas - the expression of the Slovenian originality). Zasnova strategije in metodoloske osnove celovitega razvoja in urejanja podeželja,” CRP Zemlja: Kmetijstvo in podeželje. Fazno raziskovalno poročilo.Ljubljana, BF: Oddelek za agronomijo, 8 p. + 2 maps.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennet, R. J. (ed.) (1993), Local Government in the New Europe. Belhaven Press.

  • Bernik, F. (1997), “Moč in nemoč kulture (The power and the powerlessness of culture),” Delo. Ljubljana, December 4.

  • Bogataj, J. (1989), Domače obrti na Slovenskem(Handicrafts in Slovenia). Ljubljana: Državna založba Slovenije.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogataj, J. (1992), Sto srečanj z dediščino na Slovenskem(A Hundred Cases of the Heritage in Slovenia). Ljubljana: Prešernova družba.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogataj, J. (1995a), “Sestavine kulturne istovetnosti (identitete) slovenskega podeželja (The components of cultural identity of the Slovenian countryside),” Zasnova strategije in metodološke osnove celovitega razvoja in urejanja podeželja. CRP Zemlja: Kmetijstvo in podeželje.Ljubljana: Univerza v Ljubljani, Biotehniska fakulteta, 6 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogataj, J. (1995b), “Kurentland is my land,” Našsa žena.Ljubljana, junij 1995, pp. 7, 8.

  • Bonanno, A. (1995), “Global postFordism: The conditions for rural socio-economic development,” in A. Barbič and D. Wastl-Walter (eds.), Sustainable Development of Rural Areas: From Global Problems to Local Solutions(pp. 9-21). Klagenfurt: Klagenfurter Geographische Schriften, Heft 13, Institut für Geographie der Universität Klagenfurt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capo, E. (1995), “Transformation and development in Italian rural society,” Sociologia Ruralis3/4: 297-309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrentrant, A. (1996), “Globalization and the representation of rurality: Alpine open-air museums in advanced industrial societies,” Sociologia Ruralis36(1): 4-26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fink Hafner, D. (1995), Slovensko kmetijstvo in Evropa(Slovenian agriculture and Europe). Ljubljana: Znanstveno in publicistično središče.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitchen, J. M. (1991), Endangered Spaces, Enduring Places. Change, Identity and Survival in Rural America. Westview Press.

  • Giddens, A. (1990), The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1994), “Living in a post-traditional society,” In U. Beck, A. Giddens, and S. Lash (eds.), Raflexive Modernization. Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order(pp. 56-109). Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herzog, D. and D. Wastl-Walter (1995), “The economic restructuring of Eisenkappel/Železna Kapla - a case study of a sustainable development of an underdeveloped area,” in A. Barbič and D. Wastl-Walter (eds.), Sustainable Development of Rural Areas: From Global Problems to Local Solutions(pp 126–147). Klagenfurt: Klagenfurter Geographische Schriften, Heft 13, Institut für Geographie der Universität Klagenfurt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayser, B. (1994), “Culture an important tool in rural development.” Leader: Quarterly Journal of the Community Programme(Winter) (8): 5-9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kriteriji za opredeljevanje mest v Sloveniji(1993), (Criteria for Defining Cities in Slovenia). Ljubljana: Inštitut za geografijo Univerze v Ljubljani.

  • Kučan, A. (1996), Dejavniki nacionalne prostorske indentitete v Sloveniji. Doktorska disertacija(Slovenian Landscapes: Aspects of their Perception in Relation to National Identity. Disertation thesis). Ljubljana: Univerza v Ljubljani, Biotehniška fakulteta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makarovič, G. (1981), Slovenska ljudska umetnost. Zgodovina likovne umetnosti na kmetijah(The Slovenian Folk Art. The History of the Folk Art on Farms). Ljubljana: Državna založba Slovenije.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makarovič, M. (1995a), “Tudi pravljice se spreminjajo (Even fairy tales are changing),” Delo. Ljubljana, June 20, p. 9.

  • Makarovič, M. (1995b), “Medsebojna pomoč, medsebojni stiki in povezovanja na podeželju (Murual help and personal relations in the countryside),” CRP Zemlja: kmetijstvo in podeželje. Fazno raziskovalno poročilo.Ljubljana, BF: Oddelek za agronomijo, 16 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makarovič, M. (1996), “V lep in drag spomin na rok moje mladosti (To the pleasant memory on the rock of my youth),” Delo. Ljubljana, July 11, p. 16.

  • Marsden, T., P. Love, and S. Whatmore (1990), “Introduction: Questions of rurality,” in T. Marsden, P. Lowe, and S. Withmore (eds.), Rural Restructuring. Global Processes and Their Responses(pp. 1-20). London: David Fulton Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsden, T., J. Murdoch, P. Lowe, R. Munton, and A. Flynn (1993), Constructing the Countryside. London: UCL Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mlinar, Z. (1994), Individuacija in globalizacija v prostoru(Individuation and Globalization in Space). Ljubljana: SAZU.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mlinar, Z. (1995), Uvod. Mlinar, Zdravko, ur. Osamosvajanje in povezovanje v evropskem prostoru(Emancipation and unification in the European space) (pp. 1-22). Ljubljana: Fakulteta za družbene vede, Znanstvena knjižnica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mlinar, Z. (1997), Globalization as a Research Agenda. Semi-Plenary Theme Lecture. European Sociological Association. Third Conference. University of Essex, Colchester, August 27-30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mormont, M. (1987), “Rural nature and urban nature,” Sociologia Ruralis27(1): 3-20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mormont, M. (1990), “Who is rural? or, how to be rural: Towards a sociology of the rural,” in T. Marsden, P. Lowe, and S. Withmore (eds.), Rural Restructuring. Global Processes and Their Responses(pp. 21-44). London: David Fulton Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naisbitt, J. (1994), “Megatrendi in globalni paradoks (Megatrends and global paradox),” Quoted according to: Meršol, Mitja. Držav bo tisoč, meje pa simbolične. Delo. Ljubljana, 12.11.1994, p. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (1994), Creating Rural Indicators for Shaping Territorial Policy. Paris, OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrin, T. (1995), Rural Tourism Development Strategy-A Tool for Achieving the Maximum Possible Impact of Tourism on the Revitalization of Rural Areas.Joint ECA-ECE Symposium on Rural Tourism. April 2-7, Galilee, Israel.

  • Pongratz, H. (1990), “Cultural tradition and social change in agriculture,” Sociologia Ruralis30(1): 5-17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slovar slovenskega knjižnega jezika, druga knjiga(1975), (The Dictionary of the Slovenian Language). Ljubljana: Slovenska akademija znanosti in umetnosti ter Državna založba Slovenije.

  • Strassoldo, R. (1990), “Lokalna pripadnost in globalna uvrstitev (Local belongness and global placing).” Družboslovne razprave, Ljubljana, Slovensko sociološko društvo in Inštitut za sociologijo10: 64-76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stucin, J. (1997), “Natecaj narecnih besedil Moja vas (The competition of texts in dialect My Village),” Delo. Ljubljana, Nov. 6, p. 50.

  • Tait, A. A. (1996), In My Opinion. European Gardens(Summer) (pp. 32-39). London, Sherwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urry, J. (1995), Consuming Places. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verbole, A. (1995), Pros and Cons of Rural Tourism Development: Sustainability - A Possible Way Out.Joint ECA-ECE Symposium on Rural Tourism. April 2-7, Galilee, Israel, 17 p.

  • Williams, C. H. (1992), “Identity, autonomy and the ambiguity of technological development,” in Z. Mlinar (ed.), Globalization and Territorial Identities(pp. 115-128). Avebury.

  • Zavod, R. (1993), Slovenije za statistiko(The Statistical Office of the Republic of Slovenia). Gradivo za statistiko ZN.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Biotechnical Faculty, Division for Agriculture, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia

    Ana Barbič

Authors
  1. Ana Barbič
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barbič, A. Cultural identity of the Slovenian countryside: Territorial integrity and cultural diversity from the perspective of rural communities. Agriculture and Human Values 15, 253–265 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007452715008

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007452715008

Search

Navigation