Skip to main content
Log in

Myth as Metaphysics: The Christian Saviour and the Hindu Gods

  • Published:
Sophia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A distinction which is often rehearsed in some strands of Christian writing on the ‘Eastern’ religions, especially Hinduism, is that while they are full of ‘mythological’ fancies, Biblical faith is based on the solid rock of ‘historical’ truth. I argue that the sharp contours of this antithesis are softened when we consider two issues regarding the relation between ‘myth’ and ‘history’. First, the decades–long attempts to separate the ‘historical’ facts about Jesus Christ from the interpretive elements in the Biblical narrative highlight the presence of ‘mythical’ imagination in Christian thought. Second, a comparative study of the Christian understanding of Jesus Christ as the Incarnate God and the Hindu conception of avatāras reveals a highly significant set of differences and analogies, and shows how the supposed equivalences between ‘historical as real’ and ‘mythological as unreal’ need to be reformulated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. See, for instance, Adam, 1957.

  2. Introduction to Rāmānuja’s commentary on the Bhagavadgīta, Chap. 1.

References

  • Adam, K. (1957). The Christ of Faith. London: Burns and Oates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batto, B. (1992). Slaying the Dragon: mythmaking in the biblical tradition. Louisville, Kentucky; Westminster: John Knox Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair, J. S. (1963). The Relation of the Incarnation to the Atonement. Scottish Journal of Theology, 16, 68–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunner, E. (1934). The Mediator. London: Lutterworth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bultmann, R. (1972). New Testament and Mythology. In H.-W. Bartsch (Ed.), Kerygma and Myth: A Theological Debate (pp. 1–44). London: SPCK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crisp, O. (2008). Multiple Incarnations. In M. W. F. Stone (Ed.), Reason, Faith and History: Philosophical Essays for Paul Helm (pp. 219–38). Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullmann, O. (1952). Christ and Time: The Primitive Christian Conception of Time and History. London: SCM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eliade, M. (1963). Myth and Reality. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiddes, P. S. (1989). Past Event and Present Salvation: The Christian Idea of Atonement. London: Darton Longman and Todd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishbane, M. (2005). Biblical Myth and Rabbinic Mythmaking. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gandhi, M. K. (1941). Christian Missions. Allahabad: Navajivan Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gandhi, M. K. (1990). Extracts from The Story of My Experiments with Truth. In P. J. Griffiths (Ed.), Christianity through non-Christian eyes (pp. 215–27). Maryknoll, New York: Orbis Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, G. (2010). Atonement. In C. Taliaferro & C. Meister (Eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Christian Philosophical Theology (pp. 124–35). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gunton, C. E. (1988). The Actuality of Atonement: A Study of Metaphor, Rationality and the Christian Tradition. Edinburgh: T & T Clark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, D. (1972). Hindu and Christian Theological Parallels in the Conversion of H.A.Krsna Pillai 1857–1859. Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 40, 191–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaspers, K. (1972). Myth and Religion. In H.-W. Bartsch (Ed.), Kerygma and Myth: A Theological Debate (Vol. 2). London: SPCK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macquarrie, J. (1960). The Scope of Demythologizing: Bultmann and his critics. London: SCM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macquarrie, J. (1966). Principles of Christian Theology. London: SCM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumme, P. Y. (1987). Grace and Karma in Nammalvar’s Salvation. Journal of the American Oriental Society, 107, 257–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parrinder, G. (1982). Avatar and Incarnation. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radhakrishnan, S. (1952). Reply to Critics. In P. A. Schilpp (Ed.), The Philosophy of Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan (pp. 789–842). New York: Tudor Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radhakrishnan, S. (1967). The Recovery of Faith. Delhi: Hind Pocket Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahner, K., & Vorgrimler, H. (1965). Concise Theological Dictionary. London: Burns and Oates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichenbach, B. R. (1989). Karma, Causation and Divine Intervention. Philosophy East and West, 39, 135–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Segal, R. A. (2004). Myth: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheth, N. (2002). Hindu Avatāra and Christian Incarnation: A Comparison. Philosophy East and West, 52, 98–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aurobindo, S. (1950). Essays on the Gita. New York: The Sri Aurobindo Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Surin, K. (1989). The turnings of darkness and light: essays in philosophical and systematic theology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Prabhavananda, S. (1963). The Spiritual Heritage of India. Hollywood, Calif.: Vedanta Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vivekananda Swami (1966–1971) The Complete Works of Swami Vivekananda. Calcutta: Advaita Ashrama, Vol.6.

  • Vivekananda, S. (1990). Christ the Messenger. In P. J. Griffiths (Ed.), Christianity Through Non-Christian Eyes (pp. 205–14). Orbis: Maryknoll, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swinburne, R. (1989). Responsibility and Atonement. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, R. G. (2001). Mapping Myths of Biblical Interpretation. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, V. (1991). Atonement and Incarnation: An essay in universalism and particularity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Young, N. J. (1969). History and Existential Theology: The Role of History in the Thought of Rudolf Bultmann. London: Epworth Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ankur Barua.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barua, A. Myth as Metaphysics: The Christian Saviour and the Hindu Gods. SOPHIA 51, 379–393 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11841-011-0260-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11841-011-0260-6

Keywords

Navigation