Notes
Hendrik Kraemer (1956, p. 53) has stated that only the discipline of theology (which presupposes faith on the part of the theologian) ‘is able to produce the attitude of freedom and of impartial understanding, combined with a criticism and evaluation transcending all imprisonment in preconceived ideas and principles as ultimate standards of reference.’ ‘Such assertions’, according to Joseph M. Kitagawa, ‘imply that only those who view religions “from within” are competent to understand them’ (1959, p. 14).
All subsequent pages references integrated into the text refer to Hand 2006.
Hand makes it clear that his analysis of propositional knowledge does not prejudge the issue of whether God does or does not exist; in his view the idea of a non-material spiritual being is coherent.
I use this deliberately ambiguous locution to gloss over the issue of whether the argument represents a proper interpretation of Wittgenstein’s position or not.
References
Barnes, L. P. (2001). What is wrong with the phenomenological approach to religious education? Religious Education, 96, 445–461.
Barnes, L. P. (2006). The misrepresentation of religion in modern British (religious) education. British Journal of Educational Studies, 54, 395–411.
Barnes, L. P., & Wright, A. (2006). Romanticism, representations of religion and critical religious education. British Journal of Religious Education, 28, 65–77.
Gardner, P. (1980). Religious education: In defence of non-commitment. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 14, 157–168.
Hendrik, K. (1956). Religion and the Christian faith. Philadelphia: Westminster Press.
Hirst, P. H. (1974). Knowledge and the curriculum. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Hull, J. M. (1992). The transmission of religious prejudice. British Journal of Religious Education, 14, 69–72.
Hull, J. M. (1998). Religion, religionism and religious education. In J. Laehnemann (Ed.), Interreligiöse Erziehung 2000. Die Zukunft der Religions und Kulturbegegnung (pp. 335–350). Hamburg: E.-B.-Verlag.
Kitagawa, J. M. (1959). The history of religions in America. In M. Eliade, & J. M. Kitagawa (Eds.), The history of religions (pp. 1–30). Chicago: University of Chicago.
Marples, R. (1978), Is religious education possible? Journal of Philosophy of Education, 12, 81–91.
Phillips, D. Z. (1978). Religion without explanation. Oxford: Blackwell.
Phillips, D. Z. (1986). Belief, change and forms of Life. London: Macmillan.
Ryle, G. (2000 [1949]). The Concept of Mind. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Barnes, L.P. Michael Hand, Is Religious Education Possible?. Stud Philos Educ 27, 63–70 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-007-9067-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-007-9067-x