Skip to main content
Log in

Michael Hand, Is Religious Education Possible?

Continuum, London, 2006, ISBN 0-8264-9150-2 (hbk)

  • Published:
Studies in Philosophy and Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Notes

  1. Hendrik Kraemer (1956, p. 53) has stated that only the discipline of theology (which presupposes faith on the part of the theologian) ‘is able to produce the attitude of freedom and of impartial understanding, combined with a criticism and evaluation transcending all imprisonment in preconceived ideas and principles as ultimate standards of reference.’ ‘Such assertions’, according to Joseph M. Kitagawa, ‘imply that only those who view religions “from within” are competent to understand them’ (1959, p. 14).

  2. All subsequent pages references integrated into the text refer to Hand 2006.

  3. Hand makes it clear that his analysis of propositional knowledge does not prejudge the issue of whether God does or does not exist; in his view the idea of a non-material spiritual being is coherent.

  4. I use this deliberately ambiguous locution to gloss over the issue of whether the argument represents a proper interpretation of Wittgenstein’s position or not.

References

  • Barnes, L. P. (2001). What is wrong with the phenomenological approach to religious education? Religious Education, 96, 445–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, L. P. (2006). The misrepresentation of religion in modern British (religious) education. British Journal of Educational Studies, 54, 395–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, L. P., & Wright, A. (2006). Romanticism, representations of religion and critical religious education. British Journal of Religious Education, 28, 65–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, P. (1980). Religious education: In defence of non-commitment. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 14, 157–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendrik, K. (1956). Religion and the Christian faith. Philadelphia: Westminster Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, P. H. (1974). Knowledge and the curriculum. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, J. M. (1992). The transmission of religious prejudice. British Journal of Religious Education, 14, 69–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, J. M. (1998). Religion, religionism and religious education. In J. Laehnemann (Ed.), Interreligiöse Erziehung 2000. Die Zukunft der Religions und Kulturbegegnung (pp. 335–350). Hamburg: E.-B.-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitagawa, J. M. (1959). The history of religions in America. In M. Eliade, & J. M. Kitagawa (Eds.), The history of religions (pp. 1–30). Chicago: University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marples, R. (1978), Is religious education possible? Journal of Philosophy of Education, 12, 81–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, D. Z. (1978). Religion without explanation. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, D. Z. (1986). Belief, change and forms of Life. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryle, G. (2000 [1949]). The Concept of Mind. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. Philip Barnes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barnes, L.P. Michael Hand, Is Religious Education Possible?. Stud Philos Educ 27, 63–70 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-007-9067-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-007-9067-x

Navigation