Abstract
It is suggested, following a proposal made recently by Smolin, that the most fundamental law of the universe takes this form: Among the set of all possible universes compatible with an irreducibly minimal set of structural constraints, the actually realized universe is the one which maximizes a mathematically well-defined number (the variety) that measures the structural variety of the universe (in the totality of its history). This gives expression to Leibniz's idea that the actual universe gives “the greatest variety possible, but with the greatest possible order.” Two models are proposed in which the idea can be realized and its consequences tested; both are discrete in nature and satisfy highly nonlocal laws. In such a scheme a unique (finite) universe is called into being by the fundamental requirement of maximal variety (for given definition of the variety), which it is conjectured could have such a powerful ordering effect that space, time, the currently known laws of physics, and the observed structure of the universe could all appear as emergent consequences of the single underlying law.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
L. Smolin, “Space and time in the quantum universe,” inConceptual Problems in Quantum Gravity. Proceedings of the 1988 Osgood Hill Conference, A. Ashtekar and J. Stachel, eds. (Birkhäuser, Boston, 1989), Secs. 7–9.
J. S. Bell,Physics 1, 195 (1964);Rev. Mod. Phys. 38, 447 (1966).
A. Aspect,Phys. Rev. D 14, 1944 (1976).
L. E. Loemker, ed.,Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz: Philosophical Papers and Letters (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1976).
S. Wolfram,Rev. Mod. Phys. 55, 601 (1983).
J. B. Barbour and B. Bertotti,Nuovo Cimento B 38, 1 (1977);Proc. R. Soc. London A382, 295 (1982); J. B. Barbour,Br. J. Philos. Sci. 33, 251 (1982).
B. B. Mandelbrot,The Fractal Geometry of Nature (Freeman, San Francisco, 1982).
P. Davies,The Cosmic Blueprint (Unwin, London, 1989).
B. Riemann, “Ueber die Hypothesen, welche der Geometrie zu Grunde liegen,” Habilitation address, 1854; English translation by W. K. Clifford,Nature (London)8, 14 (1873).
A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen,Phys. Rev. 47, 777 (1935).
F. Capra,The Tao of Physics (Fontana/Collins, London, 1976).
C. Eliot,Japanese Buddhism (Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, 1959), pp. 109–110 (quoted from previous reference, p. 314).
J. B. Barbour and L. Smolin, “Can quantum mechanics be sensively applied to the unviverse as a whole?” Yale preprint, 1988, to be submitted for publication.
T. Banks,Nucl. Phys. B 249, 332 (1985); D. N. Page and W. K. Wootters,Phys. Rev. D 27, 2885 (1983).
J. B. Barbour,Absolute or Relative Motion? Vol. 1.The Discovery of Dynamics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1989); Vol. 2.The Frame of the World, in preparation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Invited contribution honoring Professor Peter Mittelstaedt on the occasion of his 60th birthday.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Barbour, J.B. Maximal variety as a new fundamental principle of dynamics. Found Phys 19, 1051–1073 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01883158
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01883158