Skip to main content
Log in

Spinoza and necessary existence

  • Series: Emotion
  • Published:
Philosophia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Alston, W.P. (1967). The Ontological Argument Revisited. In W. Doney (Ed.),Descartes (pp. 278–302). Garden City: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, Jonathan (1984).A Study of Spinoza's Ethics. Indianapolis: Hackett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, Jonathan (1991). Spinoza's Monism: A Reply to Curley. In (Yovel, 1991, 53–60).

  • Cress, D. A. (1978). Duns Scotus, Spinoza, and the Ontological Argument. In C. Berube (Ed.),Regnum hominis et regnum Dei (pp. 389–399). Rome: Acti Quarti Congressus Scotistici.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curley, Edwin (1991). On Bennett's Interpretation of Spinoza's Monism. In (Yovel, 1991, 35–52).

  • Deleuze, Giles (1968).Spinoza et le problème de l'expression. Paris: Editions de Minuit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doney, W. (1980). Spinoza's Ontological Proof. In R. Kennington (Ed.),The Philosophy of Baruch Spinoza (pp. 35–52). Washington: Catholic University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doney, W. (1990). Gueroult on Spinoza's Proof of God's Existence. In E. Curley & Pierre-F. Moreau (Eds.),Spinoza: Issues and Directions (pp. 32–38). Leiden: E. J. Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donagan, Alan (1988).Spinoza. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earle, W. A. (1951). The Ontological Argument in Spinoza.Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 11, 549–554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earle, W. A. (1973a). The Ontological Argument in Spinoza: Twenty Years Later. In M. Grene (Ed.),Spinoza (pp. 220–226). Garden City: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earle, W. A. (1973b). The Ontological Argument in Spinoza. In M. Grene (Ed.),Spinoza (pp. 213–219). Garden City: Doubleday. Reprint of (Earle, 1951).

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, J. (1982). Was Spinoza Fooled by the Ontological Argument?Philosophia, 11, 307–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, D. (1979). Spinoza's ‘Ontological’ Argument.Philosophical Review, 88, 198–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gueroult, Martial (1968).Spinoza-Ethique I: Dieu. Paris: Aubier-Montaigne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marion, Jean-L. (1990). Spinoza et les trois noms de Dieu. InHerméneutique et Ontologie: Hommage à P. Aubenque (pp. 225–245). Paris: PUF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matheron, A. (1991). Essence, Existence and Power in Ethics I: The Foundations of Proposition 16. In (Yovel, 1991, 23–34).

  • Plantinga, A. (Ed.). (1965).The Ontological Argument: From St. Anselm to Contemporary Philosophers. Garden City: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, L. (1985). Spinoza, Bennett, and Teleology.Southern Journal of Philosophy, 23, 241–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, L. (1992). La causalité adéquate chez Spinoza.Philosophiques, 19, 45–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siwek, P. (1952). La preuve ontologique dans la philosophie de Spinoza.Gregorianum, 33, 621–627.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yovel, Yirmiyahu, (Ed.). (1991).God and Nature in Spinoza's Metaphysics. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barbone, S., Rice, L. Spinoza and necessary existence. Philosophia 27, 87–97 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02380997

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02380997

Navigation