Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter August 4, 2022

Not Just Many Worlds but Many Universes? A Problem for the Many Worlds View of Quantum Mechanics

  • Peter Baumann ORCID logo EMAIL logo
From the journal Metaphysica

Abstract

The many-worlds view is one of the most discussed “interpretations” of quantum mechanics. As is well known, this view has some very controversial and much discussed aspects. This paper focuses on one particular problem arising from the combination of quantum mechanics with Special Relativity. It turns out that the ontology of the many-worlds view – the account of what there is and what branches of the universe exist – is relative to inertial frames. If one wants to avoid relativizing ontology, one has to argue either that there is an additional source of branching due to Special Relativity and thus additional branches or worlds. Or one has to argue that there are not only many worlds but also many universes (sets of worlds or world-branches); there is thus not only one tree of many world-branches but many frame-specific trees, a “forest” of many world-trees. The main problem here is how one can understand all or any of this.


Corresponding author: Peter Baumann, Department of Philosophy, Swarthmore College, 500 College Avenue, 19081, Swarthmore, PA, USA, E-mail:

Acknowledgement

For discussion and comments I would like to thank John Boccio and Jean Bricmont.

References

Aharonov, Y., and D. Z. Albert. 1984. “Is the Usual Notion of Time Evolution Adequate for Quantum-Mechanical Systems? II. Relativistic Considerations.” Physical Review D 29: 228–34. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.29.228.Search in Google Scholar

Albert, D. Z. 1994. Quantum Mechanics and Experience. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.10.2307/j.ctv1bzfptvSearch in Google Scholar

Albert, D. Z. 2015. “Physics and Narrative.” In After Physics, edited by D. Z. Albert, 106–23. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674735507.c7Search in Google Scholar

Arntzenius, F. 2014. Space, Time, and Stuff. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Barrett, J. A. 2012. “Conceptual Introduction, Hugh Everett III.” In The Everett Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics: Collected Works 1955–1980 with Commentary, edited by J. A. Barrett, and P. Byrne, 26–54. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400842742.26Search in Google Scholar

Bricmont, J. 2017. Quantum Sense and Nonsense. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-65271-9Search in Google Scholar

Carroll, S. 2019. Something Deeply Hidden: Quantum Worlds and the Emergence of Spacetime. New York: Dutton.Search in Google Scholar

DeWitt, B. S. 1970. “Quantum Mechanics and Reality.” Physics Today 23 : 30–5. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3022331.Search in Google Scholar

Dieks, D. 2019. “Quantum Mechanics and Perspectivalism.” In Quantum Worlds. Perspectives on the Ontology of Quantum Mechanics, edited by O. Lombardi, S. Fortin, C. López, and F. Holik, 51–70. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108562218.005Search in Google Scholar

Everett, H. 1957. ““Relative State” Formulation of Quantum Mechanics.” Reviews of Modern Physics 29 (3): 454–62. https://doi.org/10.1103/revmodphys.29.454.Search in Google Scholar

Fine, K. 2005. Tense and Reality, Kit Fine, Modality and Tense: Philosophical Papers, 261–320. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0199278709.003.0009Search in Google Scholar

Laudisa, F., and C. Rovelli. 2019. Relational Quantum Mechanics, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2019 Edition), edited by E. N. Zalta. Also available at https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2019/entries/qm-relational/.Search in Google Scholar

Lewis, D. 1986. On the Plurality of Worlds. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Rovelli, C. 1996. “Relational Quantum Mechanics.” International Journal of Theoretical Physics 35 (8): 1637–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02302261.Search in Google Scholar

Sebens, T. C., and S. M. Carroll. 2018. “Self-locating Uncertainty and the Origin of Probability in Everettian Quantum Mechanics.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 69: 25–74. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axw004.Search in Google Scholar

Waegell, M., and K. J. McQueen. 2020. “Reformulating Bell’s Theorem: The Search for a Truly Local Quantum Theory.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 70: 39–50.10.1016/j.shpsb.2020.02.006Search in Google Scholar

Wallace, D. 2012. The Emergent Multiverse: Quantum Theory According to the Everett Interpretation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199546961.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Wallace, D., and C. G. Timpson. 2010. “Quantum Mechanics on Spacetime I: Spacetime State Realism.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 61: 697–727. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axq010.Search in Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. 1922. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, edited by C. K. Ogden. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2022-08-04
Published in Print: 2022-09-26

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 8.6.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/mp-2022-0012/html
Scroll to top button