Skip to main content
Log in

Animals and soil sustainability

  • Published:
Journal of agricultural ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Domestic livestock animals and soils must be considered together as part of an agroecosystem which includes plants. Soil sustainability may be simply defined as the maintenance of soil productivity for future generations. There are both positive and negative aspects concerning the role of animals in soil sustainability. In a positive sense, agroecosystems which include ruminant animals often also include hay forage-or pasture-based crops in the humid regions. Such crops stabilize the soil by decreasing erosion, improving soil structure and usually require fewer chemical inputs. Monogastric animal culture is based on an agroecosystem consisting of mainly grain crops. These crops can result in the soil being exposed to water and wind erosion although soil conservation practices that significantly reduce soil losses may be followed. The management of animal manures is not always compatible with soil conservation practices. Careful management of the nutrients in manure is absolutely necessary to avoid nitrate contamination of ground water or phosphorus loading of streams and lakes. In a negative sense, increases in animal livestock populations in association with human population growth are promoting desertification in the arid and semi-arid regions of the world. The key component for a fully compatible and acceptable association between domestic animals and soil productivity is proper management. Careful management of the components of an animal-based agroecosystem is required if soil productivity and environmental quality are to be maintained. Although we have much to learn, technologies are available to move a considerable way towards this ideal state.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altieri, M.A. 1987. Agroecology — the scientific basis of alternative agriculture. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp, E.G. 1983. Response of corn to nitrogen in preplant and sidedress applications of liquid dairy cattle manure.Can. J. Soil Sci. 63: 377–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, D., and E.G. Beauchamp. 1986. Nitrogen losses from swine housings.Agric. Wastes 15: 59–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, E.A., and B.R. Christie. 1988. A forage-based vision of Ontario Agriculture.J. Agric. Ethics 1: 109–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, C.V., J. Williams, M. Shaffer, and J. Hanson. 1987. Nutrient and organic matter dynamics as components of agricultural production systems models. InSoil Fertility and Organic Matter as Critical Components of Production Systems, edited by R.F. Follett. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Spec. Publ. No. 19, Am. Soc. Agron., Madison, WI.

  • Dasmann, R.F., J.P. Milton, and P.H. Freeman. 1983.Ecological Principles for Economic Development. Toronto: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairbairn, G.L. 1984. Will the Bounty End?The Uncertain Future of Canada's Food Supply. Saskatoon: Western Producer Prairie Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 1989. Conservation agriculture. InCanada Choice: Economics, Health, and Moral Issues in Food from Animals. Chap. 7. Saskatoon: M.C. Graphic, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO. 1970.Amino acid contents of foods and biological data on proteins, FAO Nutritional Studies No. 24. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyams, E. 1976.Soil and Civilization. New York: Harper and Row, Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, B.D., D.A. Angers, P.H. Groenevelt, and J. A. Baldock. 1986. Quantifying the influence of cropping history on soil structure.Can. J. Soil Sci. 68: 359–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ketcheson, J.W., and E.G. Beauchamp. 1978. Effects of corn stover, manure, and nitrogen on soil properties and crop yield.Agron. J. 70: 792–797.

    Google Scholar 

  • Läuchli, A. 1987. Soil science in the next twenty-five years: does biotechnology play a role?Soil Sci. Soc. Am.J. 51: 1405–1408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Houerou, H.N. 1988. Man and desertization in the Mediterranean region.Ambio 6: 363–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundholm, B. 1976. Domestic animals in arid ecosystems. InCan Desert Encroachment Be Stopped? edited by A. Rapp, H.N. LeHouerou and B. Lundholm.Ecol. Bull. No. 24, Swed. Natural Sci. Res. Council, United Nations Environ. Prog. and Secretariat for Int. Ecol., Sweden.

  • Lynch, J.M. 1987. Soil biology: accomplishments and potential.Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 51: 1409–1412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matlock, W.G. 1981.Realistic Planning for Arid Lands. Natural Resource Limitations to Agricultural Development. New York: Harwood Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCown, R.L., G. Haaland, and C. DeHaan. 1979. The interaction between cultivation and livestock production in semi-arid Africa. InAgriculture in Semi-arid Environments, edited by A.E. Hall, G.H. Cannell and H.W. Lawton. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCracken, R.J. 1987. Soils, soil scientists, and civilization.Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 51: 1395–1400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mowat, D.N., J.D. Summers, G.H. Bowman, W.R. Usborne, and J.H. Burton. 1974. Efficiency of production of meat and milk. InEnergy and Agriculture edited by N.C. Stoskoff. Proc. Ont. Instit. Agrology, 15th Annual Conf., University of Guelph.

  • Rosswall, T. 1976. The internal nitrogen cycle between organisms and soil. InNitrogen, Phosphorus and Sulphur in Global Cycles, edited by B.H. Svensson and R. Sderlund. SCOPE Report 7, Ecol. Bull. (Stockholm) 22: 157–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheridan, D. 1981.Desertification of the United States. Council on Environmental Quality. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparrow, H.O. 1984.Soil at Risk: Canada's Eroding Future. A Report on Soil Conservation by the Standing Committee on Agriculture, Fisheries, and Forestry to the Senate of Canada.

  • Spedding, C.R.W. 1988. An Introduction to Agricultural Systems. 2nd ed. New York: Elsevier Applied Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swaminathan, M.S. et al., eds. 1988. Rehabilitating and restoring degraded lands. InWorld Resources 1988–89, Chap. 13, A Report by The World Resources Institute and The International Institute for Environment and Development. New York: Basic Books, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Troeh, F.R., J.H. Hobbs, and R.L. Donahue. 1980.Soil and Water Conservation for Productivity and Environmental Protection. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogtmann, H. 1984. Organic farming practices and research in Europe. InOrganic Farming: Current Technology and Its Role in a Sustainable Agriculture, edited by D.F. Bezadicek. Am.Soc. Agron. Special Public. No. 46, Am. Soc. Agron., Madison, WI.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Beauchamp, E.G. Animals and soil sustainability. Journal of Agricultural Ethics 3, 89–98 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02014481

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02014481

Keywords

Navigation