References
Alexander, Peter, ‘Complementary Descriptions,’ Mind LXV # 258 (April 1956) pp. 145–165.
Bernays, Paul. ‘Über die Ausdehnung des Begriffes der Komplementarität auf die Philosophie,’ Synthèse VII # 1–2 (1948–1949) pp. 66–70.
Bohm, David. ‘A Proposed Explanation of Quantum Theory in Terms of Hidden Variables at a Sub-quantum-mechanical Level,’ pp. 33–40 in Körner, Stephen (ed.), Observation and Interpretation New York: Academic Press, Inc., 1957.
Bohr, Niels [1]. Atomic Theory and the Description of Nature Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1934.
Bohr, Niels [2]. ‘Can Quantum Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?’ Physical Review XLVIII (Oct. 15, 1935) pp. 696–702.
Bohr, Niels [3]. ‘Causality and Complementarity,’ Philosophy of Science IV # 3 (July 1937) pp. 289–298.
Bohr, Niels [4]. ‘The Causality Problem in Atomic Physics,’ pp. 11–30 in New Theories in Physics Paris: International Institute of Intellectual Cooperation, 1939.
Bohr, Niels [5]. ‘On the Notions of Causality and Complementarity,’ Dialectica # 7/8 (1948), pp. 312–319.
Bohr, Niels [6]. Atomic Physics and Human Knowledge New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1958.
Bohr, Niels [7]. ‘Quantum Physics and Philosophy,’ pp. 308–314 in Klibanski, Raymond (ed.), Philosophy in Mid-Century, Vol. I, Firenze: La Nuova Italia Editrice, 1958.
Born, Max [1]. The Natural Philosophy of Cause and Chance Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1949.
Born, Max [2]. The Restless Universe New York: Dover Publications, Inc., 1951.
Bunge, Mario. ‘Strife About Complementarity,’ British Journal of Philosophy of Science VI # 21–22 (May–August 1955) pp. 1–12, 141–154.
Carnap, Rudolf [1]. ‘Testability and Meaning,’ Philosophy of Science III # 4 (Oct. 1936) pp. 419–471.
Carnap, Rudolf [2]. Introduction to Symbolic Logic New York: Dover Publications, Inc., 1958.
De Broglie, Louis [1]. Matter and Light New York: W. W. Norton and Co., 1939.
De Broglie, Louis [2]. The Revolution in Physics New York: The Noonday Press, 1953.
Destouches-Février, P. ‘Manifestations et sens de la notion de complémentarité,’ Dialectica # 7/8 (1948) pp. 383–412.
Dirac, P. A. M. The Principles of Quantum Mechanics 4th ed., Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1958.
Feyerabend, P. K. [1]. ‘An Attempt at a Realistic Interpretation of Experience,’ Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society LVIII (1957–1958) pp. 143–170.
Feyerabend, P. K. [2]. ‘Complementarity,’ Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume XXXII (July 1958) pp. 75–105.
Feyerabend, P. K. [3]. ‘Reichenbach's Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics,’ Philosophical Studies IX # 4 (June 1958) pp. 49–59.
Frank, Philipp [1]. Modern Science and Its Philosophy Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1950.
Frank, Philipp [2]. Philosophy of Science Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1957.
Gamow, George. ‘The Principle of Uncertainty,’ Scientific American CXCVIII # 1 (Jan. 1958) pp. 51–57.
Grünbaum, Adolf. ‘Complementarity in Quantum Physics and Its Philosophical Generalizations,’ The Journal of Philosophy LIV # 23 (Nov. 7, 1957).
Hempel, Carl G. [1]. Fundamentals of Concept Formation in Empirical Science Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1952.
Hempel, Carl G. [2] Journal of Symbolic Logic, 10, # 3, pp. 97–100.
Hanson, Norwood Russell [1]. Patterns of Discovery Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1958.
Hanson, Norwood Russell [2]. ‘Copenhagen Interpretation of Quantum Theory,’ American Journal of Physics XXVII # 1 (Jan. 1959) pp. 1–15.
Hanson, Norwood Russell [3]. ‘Five Conditions for the Copenhagen Interpretation's Critics,’ Philosophy of Science XXVI # 4 (Oct. 1959) pp. 325–337.
Heisenberg, Werner [1]. Philosophic Problems of Nuclear Science London: Faber and Faber, Ltd., 1952.
Heisenberg, Werner [2]. ‘The Development of the Interpretation of the Quantum Theory,’ pp. 12–29 in Pauli, W. (ed.), Niels Bohr and the Development of Physics New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1955.
Heisenberg, Werner [3]. The Physicist's Conception of Nature London: Hutchinson and Co., 1958.
Heisenberg, Werner [4]. Physics and Philosophy New York: Harper and Bros., 1958.
Heisenberg, Werner [5]. ‘The Representation of Nature in Contemporary Physics,’ in May, Rollo (ed.), Symbolism in Religion and Literature New York: George Braziller, 1960.
Hutten, Ernest H. The Language of Modern Physics London: George Allen and Unwin, 1956.
MacKay, D. M. [1]. ‘Complementary Descriptions,’ Mind LXVI # 263 (July 1957) pp. 390–394.
MacKay, D. M. [2]. ‘Complementarity,’ Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume XXXII (July 1958) pp. 105–122.
Margenau, Henry [1]. The Nature of Physical Reality New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc., 1950.
Margenau, Henry [2]. ‘Philosophical Problems Concerning the Meaning of Measurement in Physics,’ Philosophy of Science XXV # 1 (Jan. 1958) pp. 23–30.
Nagel, Ernest [1]. ‘The Causal Character of Modern Physical Theory,’ pp. 419–437 reprinted in Feigl, Herbert and Brodbeck, May (eds.), Readings in the Philosophy of Science New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, Inc., 1953.
Nagel, Ernest [2]. Review of Reichenbach's Philosophical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. Journal of Philosophy XLII, # 16, (Aug. 2, 1945) pp. 437–444.
Noyes, H. Pierre. ‘The Physical Description of Elementary Particles,’ American Scientist XLV # 4 (Dec. 1957) pp. 431–448.
Pauli, Wolfgang. ‘Die philosophische Bedeutung der Idee der Komplementarität,’ Experentia VI # 2 (1950) pp. 72–74.
Popper, K. R. The Logic of Scientific Discovery London: Hutchinson and Co., Ltd., 1959.
Reichenbach, Hans. Philosophic Foundations of Quantum Mechanics Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1944.
Rosenfeld, L. ‘Strife About Complementarity,’ Science Progress XLI # 163 (July 1953) pp. 393–410.
Schilpp, P. A. (ed.). Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist Evanston: Library of Living Philosophers, 1949.
Schrödinger, Erwin. ‘What is Matter?’ Scientific American CXXCIX # 3 (Sept. 1953) pp. 52–57.
Weizsäcker, C. F. von. ‘Komplementarität und Logic,’ Die Naturwissenschaften XLII # 19–20 (1955) pp. 521–529, 545–555.
Additional information
While the authors alone take full responsibility for the article, they wish to acknowledge with sincere appreciation that V. Bargmann, J. H. Brown, P. K. Feyerabend, C. G. Hempel, A. Peterson, H. Putnam, I. Zinnes and the late Hillis Kaiser have given, through written comments or oral discussions, important suggestions toward the final formulation.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bedau, H., Oppenheim, P. Complementarity in quantum mechanics: A logical analysis. Synthese 13, 201–232 (1961). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00489884
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00489884